Achieving Economic Self-Sufficiency Through Housing Assistance: An Assessment of a Self-Sufficiency Program of the Housing Authority of Champaign County, Illinois

References

• Abravanel, M. D., Smith, R., Turner, M. A., Cove, E., Harris, L. E., & Manjarrez, C. (2004). Testing public housing deregulation: A summary assessment of HUD’s “Moving to Work” demonstration. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D., & Evans, W. N. (1998). Children and their parents’ labor supply: Evidence from exogenous variation in family size. American Economic Review, 88(3), 450–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, J. (2005). Family self-sufficiency programs: An evaluation of program benefits and factors affecting participants’ success. Urban Affairs Review, 41(1), 65–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. (1985). Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 3(1, Part 2), S33–S58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, H. S., Riccio, J. A., Verma, N., & Walter, J. (2005). Promoting work in public housing. The effectiveness of Jobs-Plus. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Brick, C., & McCarty, M. (2012). Moving to work (MTW): Housing assistance demonstration program. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. E. (2010). Fewer eligible families have received cash assistance since the 1990s, and the recession’s impact on caseloads varies by state. GAO-10-164. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, A., Dorsett, R., & Purdon, S. (2002). The use of propensity score matching in the evaluation of active labor market policies. Policy Studies Institute and National Centre for Social Research Department for Work and Pensions Working Paper 4.
   Google Scholar
• Cadik, E., & Nogic, A. (2010). Moving to work: Report to congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, D., Haveman, R., Kaplan, T., & Wolfe, B. (2012). Long-term earnings and employment effects of housing voucher receipt. Journal of Urban Economics, 71(1), 128–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, J., & Yelowitz, A. (2000). Are public housing projects good for kids? Journal of Public Economics, 75(1), 99–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, G., McCarty, M., & Aussenberg, R. A. (2016). Work requirements, time limits, and work incentives in TANF, SNAP, and housing assistance. R43400. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Ficke, R. C., & Piesse, A. (2004). Evaluation of the family self-sufficiency program: Retrospective analysis, 1996–2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J., Gottschalk, P., & Moffitt, R. A. (1998). An analysis of sample attrition in panel data: The Michigan Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Journal of Human Resources, 33(2), 251–299.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, S., Friedlander, D., Hamilton, G., Rock, J., Mitchell, M., Nudelman, J., … Storto, L. (2000). Evaluating alternative welfare-to-work approaches: Two-year impacts for eleven programs. National evaluation of welfare-to-work strategies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families and Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation; and U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Under Secretary and Office of Vocational and Adult Education.
   Google Scholar
• Housing Authority of Champaign County. (2012). Housing Authority of Champaign County moving to work year 2 plan. Champaign, IL: Author. Retrieved from http://www.hacc.net/mtw%20plan/Year%202%20MTW%20Plan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Housing Authority of Champaign County. (2015). Housing Authority of Champaign County moving to work year 5 plan. Champaign, IL: Author. Retrieved from http://www.hacc.net/mtw%20plan/Year%205%20Plan%20V4%201-23-15%20Blackline%201-23-15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Housing Authority of Champaign County. (2017). Housing Authority of Champaign County moving to work year 7 plan. Champaign, IL: Author. Retrieved from http://www.hacc.net/mtw%20plan/2017%20MTW%20Plan%20V2%20Clean%201-26-17.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ihlanfeldt, K. R., & Sjoquist, D. L. (1998). The spatial mismatch hypothesis: A review of recent studies and their implications for welfare reform. Housing Policy Debate, 9(4), 849–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, B. A., & Ludwig, J. (2012). The effects of housing assistance on labor supply: Evidence from a voucher lottery. The American Economic Review, 102(1), 272–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayakody, R., & Stauffer, D. (2000). Mental health problems among single mothers: Implications for work and welfare reform. Journal of Social Issues, 56(4), 617–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kain, J. F. (1992). The spatial mismatch hypothesis: Three decades later. Housing Policy Debate, 3(2), 371–460.
   Google Scholar
• Kleit, R. G., & Rohe, W. M. (2005). Using public housing to achieve self-sufficiency: Can we predict success? Housing Studies, 20(1), 81–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalopoulos, C., Schwartz, C., & Adams-Ciardullo, D. (2001). National evaluation of welfare-to-work strategies. What works best for whom: Impacts of, 20 welfare-to-work programs by subgroup. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, G., Gubits, D., Orr, L., Long, D., Feins, J., Kaul, B., … Jones, A. (2006). Effects of housing vouchers on welfare families. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, S. J. (1999). The home front: Implications of welfare reform for housing policy. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, E. O., Tyler, C. A., King, J. W., & Carrillo, P. E. (2005). The effects of different types of housing assistance on earnings and employment. Cityscape, 8(2), 163–187.
   Google Scholar
• Rohe, W. M., & Kleit, R. G. (1997). From dependency to self-sufficiency: An appraisal of the gateway transitional families program. Housing Policy Debate, 8(1), 75–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohe, W. M., & Kleit, R. G. (1999). Housing, welfare reform, and self-sufficiency: An assessment of the family self-sufficiency program. Housing Policy Debate, 10(2), 333–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohe, W. M., Webb, M. D., & Frescoln, K. P. (2016). Work requirements in public housing: Impacts on tenant employment and evictions. Housing Policy Debate, 26(6), 909–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (2001). Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: Application to the tobacco litigation. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2(3–4), 169–188.
   Google Scholar
• Sard, B. (2001). The family self-sufficiency program: HUD’s best kept secret for promoting employment and asset growth. Washington, DC: Center for Budget and Policy Priorities.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. F. (2006). Housing policy in the United States. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shlay, A. B. (1993). Family self-sufficiency and housing. Housing Policy Debate, 4(3), 457–496.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, L. D., Wijewardena, I., Wood, M., & Kaul, B. (2011). Evaluation of the family self-sufficiency program: Prospective study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Spar, K., & Falk, G. (2016). Federal benefits and services for people with low income: Overview of spending trends, FY2008-FY2015. R44574. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Susin, S. (2005). Longitudinal outcomes of subsidized housing recipients in matched survey and administrative data. Cityscape, 8(2), 189–218.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2017). Picture of subsidized households [data file]. Retrieved from https:/huduser.gov/portal/datasets/assthsg.html
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2017). American Community Survey 2008-2012 [data file]. Retrieved from https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/searchresults.xhtml?refresh=t
   Google Scholar
• Webb, M. D., Frescoln, K. P., & Rohe, W. M. (2016). Innovation in U.S. public housing: A critique of the moving to work demonstration. International Journal of Housing Policy, 16(1), 111–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, B. A., Duncan, G. J., & Whitener, L. A. (Eds.). (2002). Rural dimensions of welfare reform. Michigan: WE Upjohn Institute.
   Google Scholar