References
- Anderson, J. E., Clemens, J., & Hanson, A. (2007). Capping the mortgage interest deduction. National Tax Journal, 60(4), 769–785.
- Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon. com’s mechanical turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368.
- Big Builder Staff. (2010). NAHB poll: voters strongly support mortgage-interest tax deduction. Retrieved from http://www.builderonline.com/money/mortgage-finance/nahb-poll-voters-strongly-support-mortgage-interest-tax-deduction_o.
- Bohannon, J. (2011). Social science for pennies. Science, 334(6054), 307.
- Bohannon, J. (2016). Mechanical turk upends social sciences. Science, 352(6291), 1263–1265.
- Bourassa, S. C., & Grigsby, W. G. (2000). Income tax concessions for owner-occupied housing. Housing Policy Debate, 11(3), 521–546.
- Bourassa, S. C., Haurin, D. R., Hendershott, P. H., & Hoesli, M. (2013). Mortgage interest deductions and homeownership: An international survey. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 21(2), 181–204.
- Brochu, P. M., Pearl, R. L., Puhl, R. M., & Bronwell, K. D. (2014). Do media portrayals of obesity influence support for weight-related medical policy? Health Psychology, 32(2), 197–200.
- Brooks, C., & Manza, J. (2006). Social policy responsiveness in developed democracies. American Sociological Review, 71(3), 474–494.
- Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5.
- Campbell, C., & Gaddis, S. M. (2017). ‘I don’t agree with giving cash’: A survey experiment examining support for public assistance. Social Science Quarterly, 98(5), 1352–1373.
- CBS News Poll. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.pollingreport.com/budget3.htm.
- Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126.
- Clifford, S., Jewell, R. M., & Waggoner, P. D. (2015). Are samples drawn from MTurk valid for research on political ideology? Research and Politics, 2(4), 1–9.
- Cobb, M. D. (2005). Framing effects on public opinion about nanotechnology. Science Communication, 27(2), 221–239.
- Congressional Budget Office. (2013). The distribution of major tax expenditures in the individual income tax system. Retrieved from https://www.cbo.gov/publication/43768.
- Dietz, R. (2013). New poll confirms broad support for the mortgage interest deduction. Retrieved from http://eyeonhousing.org/2013/07/new-poll-confirms-broad-support-for-the-mortgage-interest-deduction/.
- Dreier, P. (1997). The new politics of housing: How to rebuild the constituency for a progressive federal housing policy. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(1), 5–27.
- Druckman, J. N. (2001a). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1041–1066.
- Druckman, J. N. (2001b). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23(3), 225–256.
- Garcia, D., & Abascal, M. (2016). Colored perceptions: Racially distinctive names and assessments of skin color. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(4), 420–441.
- Glaeser, E. L., & Shapiro, J. M. (2003). The benefits of the home mortgage interest deduction. Tax Policy and the Economy, 17, 37–82.
- Hanson, A. (2012). Size of home, homeownership, and the mortgage interest deduction. Journal of Housing Economics, 21(3), 195–210.
- Hanson, A., Brannon, I., & Hawley, Z. (2014). Rethinking tax benefits for home owners. National Affairs, 19, 40–54.
- Hilber, C. A. L., & Turner, T. M. (2014). The mortgage interest deduction and its impact on homeownership decisions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(4), 618–637.
- Howard, C. (1997). The hidden welfare state. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Jacoby, W. G. (2000). Issue framing and public opinion on government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 750–767.
- Jappelli, T., & Pistaferri, L. (2007). Do people respond to tax incentives? An analysis of Italian reform of the deductibility of home mortgage interests. European Economic Review, 51, 247–271.
- Katz, B. (2012). Cut to invest: Reform the mortgage interest deduction to invest in innovation and advanced industries. Brookings Institute. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/06-mortgage-interest-deduction.pdf
- Kennedy, C., Mercer, A., Keeter, S., Hatley, N., McGeeney, K., & Gimenez, A. (2016). Evaluating online nonprobability surveys. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/2016/05/02/evaluating-online-nonprobability-surveys/.
- Kusisto, L. (2017). Housing groups spar over mortgage deduction: Homebuilders, realtors associations split after decades of strong support for tax break. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/housing-groups-spar-over-mortgage-deduction-1508146200.
- Levay, K. E., Freese, J., & Druckman, J. N. (2016). The demographic and political composition of mechanical turk samples. Sage Open, 6(1), 1–16.
- Lopez, P. (2010). Voters warn: Don’t mess with the mortgage interest deduction. Retrieved from http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20100922006215/en/Voters-Warn-Don’t-Mess-Mortgage-Interest-Deduction.
- Manza, J., & Cook, F. L. (2002). A democratic polity? Three views of policy responsiveness to public opinion in the United States. American Politics Research, 30(6), 630–667.
- McCabe, B. J. (2011). Despite benefit disparities, middle class supports mortgage interest deduction. Retrieved from https://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/13/despite-benefit-disparities-middle-class-supports-mortgage-deduction/.
- McCabe, B. J. (2016). No place like home: Wealth, community and the politics of homeownership. New York: Oxford University Press.
- McCabe, B. J., & Heerwig, J. A. (2012). Reframing the marriage debate: Wording, context, and intensity of support for marriage and civil unions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(4), 429–449.
- McCright, A. M., Dentzman, K., Charters, M., & Dietz, T. (2013). The influence of political ideology on trust in science. Environmental Research Letters, 8(4), 1–9. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044029
- Mettler, S. (2011). The submerged state: How invisible government policies undermine American democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Morrow, R. N. (2012). Billions of tax dollars spent inflating the housing bubble: How and why the mortgage interest deduction failed. Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 17(3), 751–822.
- Mullinix, K. J., Leeper, T. J., Druckman, J. N., & Freese, J. (2015). The generalizability of survey experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2), 109–138.
- Mutz, D. C. (2011). Population-based survey experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- National Association of Realtors. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.nar.realtor/mortgage-interest-deduction.
- Nelson, T. E., & Oxley, Z. M. (1999). Issue framing effects on belief importance and opinion. The Journal of Politics, 61(4), 1040–1067.
- Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19(3), 221–246.
- Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the turk: Understanding mechanical turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188.
- Perin, C. (1977). Everything in its place: Social order and land use in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Poterba, J., & Sinai, T. (2008). Tax expenditures for owner-occupied housing: Deductions for property taxes and mortgage interest and the exclusion of imputed rental income. The American Economic Review, 98(2), 84–89.
- Rasinski, K. A. (1989). The effect of question wording on public support for government spending. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53(3), 388–394.
- Robbins, B. G. (2016). Probing the links between trustworthiness, trust, and emotion: Evidence from four experiments. Social Psychology Quarterly, 79(3), 284–308.
- Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20.
- Smith, T. W. (1987). That which we call welfare by any other name would smell sweeter an analysis of the impact of question wording on response patterns. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51(1), 75–83.
- Sommer, K., & Sullivan, P. (2017). Implications of U.S. tax policy for house prices, rents, and homeownership. American Economic Review, 108(2), 241–274.
- Streitfield, D., & Thee-Brenan, M. (2011). Despite fears, owning a home retains allure, polls show. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/30/business/30poll.html?scp=1&sq=homeownership&st=cse
- Toder, E., Harris, B. J., & Lim, K. (2009). Distributional effects of tax expenditures. New York: Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
- Toder, E., Turner, M. A., Lim, K., & Getsinger, L. (2010). Reforming the mortgage interest deduction. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved from https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/28666/412099-reforming-the-mortgage-interest-deduction.pdf
- United States Census Bureau. (2017). Quarterly residential vacancies and homeownership, second quarter 2017. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/housing/hvs/files/currenthvspress.pdf.
- United States Department of the Treasury. (2017). Tax expenditures: Resource center. Retrieved from https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/tax-policy/Pages/Tax-Expenditures.aspx.
- Ventry, D. J. (2010). The accidental deduction: A history and critique of the tax subsidy for mortgage interest. Law and Contemporary Problems, 73(1), 233–284.
- Woellert, L. (2017). Homeowner tax relief looks vulnerable as industry breaks ranks. Retrieved from https://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/27/mortgage-tax-deduction-home-builders-243227.