References
- California Housing Forum. (2016). 2016 California housing forum key findings report. Retrieved from https://caanet.org/app/uploads/2016/12/CA-Housing-Forum-Key-Findings-Report_FINAL.pdf
- Cameron, C., & Miller, D. (2015). A Practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 317–372.
- DeSalvo, J. (1974). Neighborhood upgrading effects of middle-income housing projects in New York City. Journal of Urban Economics, 1(3), 269–277.
- Dillon, L. (2017, January 3). California’s housing affordability problems ‘As bad as they’ve ever been in the State’s History,’ housing director says. The Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-california-housing-affordability-1483490282-htmlstory.html
- Ebenau, V. (2017). Shore assemblyman Sean Kean looking to revive RCA’s in New Jersey, 92.7 WOBM. Retrieved from http://wobm.com/shore-assemblyman-sean-kean-looking-to-revive-rcas-in-new-jersey
- Evans, T. (2007). RCA’s: More harm than good. New Jersey Future. Retrieved from https://www.njfuture.org/2007/01/31/rcas-regional-contribution-agreements
- Fair Share Housing Center. (n.d.). Mount Laurel Doctrine. Retrieved from http://fairsharehousing.org/mount-laurel-doctrine
- Fischel, W. (1987). Economics of zoning laws. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Fischel, W. (2005). The homevoter hypothesis: How home values influence local government taxation, school finance, and land use policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Fischel, W. (2015). The economics of land use regulation. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
- Fox, R. (1987). The selling out of Mount Laurel: regional contribution agreements in New Jersey’s fair housing act. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 16(4), 535–572.
- Glaeser, E., & Gyourko, J. (2017). The economic implication of housing supply (Working Paper No. w23833). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3038661
- Graham, B. (2018). Identifying and estimating neighborhood effects. Journal of Economic Literature, 56(2), 450–500.
- Green, R., Malpezzi, S., & Seah, K. (2002). Low income housing tax credit housing developments and property values (The Center for Urban Land Economics Research). The University of Wisconsin. Retrieved from http://medinamn.us/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Low-Income-Housing-Tax-Credit-Housing-Developments-and-Property-Values-UW-Study.pdf
- Guy, D., Hysom, J., & Ruth, J. (1985). The effects of subsidized housing on values of adjacent housing. Real Estate Economics, 13(4), 378–387.
- Harris, D. (1999). ‘Property values drop when blacks move in, because…’: Racial and socioeconomic determinants of neighborhood desirabilty. American Sociological Review, 64(3), 461–479.
- Hermansson, H. (2007). The ethics of NIMBY conflicts. Ethics Theory and Moral Practice, 10(1), 23–34.
- Hernandez, J., Friedman, D., & DeHerrera, S. (2015). In the name of environment. How litigation abuse under the California environmental quality act undermines California’s environmental, social equity and economic priorities – And proposed reforms to protect the environment from CEQA litigation abuse(Law Firm of Harold and Knight). Retrieved from http://issuu.com/hollandknight/docs/ceqa_litigation_abuseissuu?e=16627326/14197714
- Iglesias, T. (2002). Managing local opposition to affordable housing: A new approach to NIMBY. Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law, 12(1), 78–122.
- Kimberlin, S. (2017). Understanding the recently enacted 2017 state legislative housing package. California Budget and Policy Center. Retrieved from http://calbudgetcenter.org/blog/understanding-recently-enacted-2017-state-legislative-housing-package
- Lee, C., Culhane, D., & Wachter, S. (1999). The differential impact of federally assisted housing programs on nearby property values: A philadelphia case study. Housing Policy Debate, 10(2), 75–93.
- Lewis, P. (2003). California’s housing element law: The issue of local noncompliance. Public Policy Institute of California. Retrieved from http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/report/R_203PLR.pdf
- Myers, C. (2004). Discrimination and neighborhood effects: Understanding racial differences in U.S. housing prices. Journal of Urban Economics, 56, 279–302.
- Narula, K. (2014, April 29). The 5 U.S. Counties where racial diversity is highest – and lowest. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2014/04/mapping-racial-diversity-by-county/361388
- Nguyen, M. (2005). Does affordable housing detrimentally affect property values? A review of the literature. Journal of Planning Literature, 20(1), 15–26.
- Nichols, C. (2017). TRUE: California has the nation’s highest poverty rate, when factoring in cost-of-living. PolitiFact California. Retrieved from https://www.politifact.com/california/statements/2017/jan/20/chad-mayes/true-california-has-nations-highest-poverty-rate-w
- Nourse, H. (1963). The effects of public housing on property values in St. Louis. Land Economics, 39(4), 433–441.
- O’Neill, M., Gualco-Nelson, J., & Biber, E. (2018). Getting it right: Examining the local land use entitlement process in California to inform policy and process. Center for Law, Energy, and the Environment, Berkeley Law. Retrieved from https://www.law.berkeley.edu/research/clee/research/land-use/getting-it-right
- Ramsey-Musolf, D. (2016). Evaluating California’s housing element law, housing equity, and housing production (1990–2007). Journal of Housing Policy Debate, 26(3), 488–516.
- Rawson, M. (2006). California affordable housing law project: Anti-NIMBY tools. California department of housing and community development (California Housing Law Project). Retrieved from http://www.housingadvocates.org/docs/antinimbytools.pdf
- Scally, C., & Tighe, R. (2015). Democracy in action? NIMBY as impediment to equitable affordable housing siting. Journal of Housing Studies, 30(5), 749–769.
- Schively, C. (2007). Understanding the NIMBY and LULU phenomena: Reassessing our knowledge base and informing future research. Journal of Planning Literature, 21(3), 255–266.
- Taylor, M. (2016a, May 18). Considering changes to streamline local housing approvals. California Office of Legislative Analyst. Retrieved from http://www.lao.ca.gov/reports/2016/3470/Streamline-Local-Housing-Approvals.pdf.
- Taylor, M. (2016b, February 9). Perspectives on helping low-income californians afford housing. California Office of Legislative Analyst. Retrieved from http://www.lao.ca.gov/Reports/2016/3345/Low-Income-Housing-020816.pdf
- Wassmer, R. (2005). An economic view of the causes as well as the costs and some of the benefits of Urban spatial segregation. In D. Varady (Ed.), Desegregating the City: Ghettos, enclaves, and inequality (pp. 158–175). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
- Weisberg, B. (2007). One City’s approach to NIMBY how New York City developed a fair share siting process. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(2), 93–97.
- Woo, A., Joh, K., & Zandt, S. (2016). Unpacking the impacts of the low-income housing tax credit programs on nearby property values. Sage Urban Studies, 53(12), 2488–2510. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0042098015593448?journalCode=usja