Geographically Targeted Place-Based Community Development Interventions: A Systematic Review and Examination of Studies’ Methodological Rigor

References

• Auslander, W., Fisher, C., Ollie, M., & Yu, M. S. (2012). Teaching master’s and doctoral social work students to systematically evaluate evidence-based interventions. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 32(4), 320–341.
   Google Scholar
• Bishaw, A. (2014). Changes in areas with concentrated poverty: 2000 to 2010. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2014/acs/acs-27.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, H. S., Riccio, J. A.., & Verma, N. (2011). Promoting work in public housing: The effectiveness of Jobs-Plus final report (Research Report). Retrieved from MDRC: https://www.mdrc.org/sites/default/files/full_485.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bridgespan Group. (2011). Next generation of community revitalization: A work in progress. The Bridgespan Group. Boston, MA. Retrieved from https://www.bridgespan.org/bridgespan/Images/articles/next-generation-community-revitalization/next-generation-community-revitalization_full-report.pdf?ext=.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J., & Geoghegan, J. (2011). Spatially delineated public goods and spatially located public bads: A hedonic approach to measuring urban revitalization. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 40(3), 360–374.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, T., & Brown, P. (2012). Lessons from a national scan of comprehensive place-based philanthropic initiatives. Retrieved from http://www.heinz.org/UserFiles/File/Place-Based/UrbanVentures_final-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Busso, M., & Kline, P. (2007). Do local economic development programs work? Evidence from the federal Empowerment Zone Program. University of Michigan: Cowles Foundation, Yale University, Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers: 1639. Retrieved from http://cowles.econ.yale.edu/P/cd/d16a/d1638.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Busso, M., Gregory, J., & Kline, P. (2013). Assessing the incidence and efficiency of a prominent place based policy. American Economic Review, 103(2), 897–947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill, M., Lowry, S., & Mitchell Downey, P. (2011). Movin’ Out: Crime displacement and HUD’s HOPE VI Initiative (Research Report). Retrieved from Urban Institute: https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/27481/412385-movin-out-crime-and-hud-s-hope-vi-initiative.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, D. A. (2008). Tax increment financing and property value: An examination of business property using panel data. Urban Affairs Review, 43(4), 520–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, N. (2010). HOPE VI neighborhood spillover effects in Baltimore. Cityscape, 12(1), 65–98.
   Google Scholar
• Cisneros, H. (2015). The significance of place-based initiatives. In E. M. Hopkins & J. M. Ferris (Eds.), Moving to higher ground: Place-based initiatives in the context of public policy and markets (pp. 5–8). Los Angeles: The Center on Philanthropy and Public Policy, University of Southern California.
   Google Scholar
• Coulton, C. J. (2008). Catalog of administrative data sources for neighborhood indicators. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from https://www.urban.org/research/publication/catalog-administrative-data-sources-neighborhood-indicators
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, S., & Pelettiere, D. (2012). Affordable housing dilemma: The preservation vs. mobility debate. Retrieved from National Low Income Housing Coalition: https://nlihc.org/sites/default/files/affordablehousingdilemmareportmay-2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Deeks, J. J., Dinnes, J., D’Amico, R., Sowden, A. J., Sakarovitch, C., Song, F., … Altman, D. G. (2003). Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technology Assessment, 7(27), iii–x, 1–173. doi:10.3310/hta7270
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dilger, R. J. (2015). Federal grants to state and local governments: A historical perspective on contemporary issues. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R40638.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, P. G., & Kimble, C. E. (2006). An evaluation of the effects of neighborhood mobilization on community problems. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 32(1–2), 61–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elvery, J. A. (2009). The impact of enterprise zones on resident employment: An evaluation of the enterprise zone programs of California and Florida. Economic Development Quarterly, 23(1), 44–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, & Urban Institute. (2014). What counts: Harnessing data for America’s communities. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco & Urban Institute. Retrieved from http://www.whatcountsforamerica.org/
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, M. W., Richman, J. M., Galinsky, M. J., & Day, S. H. (2009). Intervention research: Developing social programs. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G. (2017). People versus place, people and place, or more? New directions for housing policy. Housing Policy Debate, 27(2), 261–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G., Tatian, P., & Accordino, J. (2006). Targeting investments for neighborhood revitalization. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(4), 457–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G., Temkin, K., Walker, C., & Sawyer, N. (2004). Measuring the impacts of community development initiatives: A new application of the adjusted interrupted time-series method. Evaluation Review, 28(6), 502–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C. (2012). The mechanism(s) of neighborhood effects: Theory, evidence, and policy Implications. In M. van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Neighborhood effects research: New perspectives (pp. 23–56). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2309-2
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C., Hayes, C., & Johnson, J. (2005). Identifying robust, parsimonious neighborhood indicators. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24(3), 265–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, G. P., & Haines, A. (2015). Asset building and community development (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, R. T., & Engberg, J. B. (2004). The impact of state Enterprise Zones on urban manufacturing establishments. Journal of Policy Analysis & Management, 23(2), 315–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, R. (1995). Rebuilding the inner city: A history of neighborhood initiatives to address poverty in the United States. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, A. (2009). Local employment, poverty, and property value effects of geographically-targeted tax incentives: An instrumental variables approach. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(6), 721–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, E. M., & Ferris, J. (Eds.). (2015). Moving to higher ground: Place-based initiatives in the context of public policy and markets. Los Angeles, CA: The Center on Philanthropy and Public Policy, University of Southern California.
   Google Scholar
• Jargowsky, P. A. (2015). The architecture of segregation: Civil unrest, the concentration of poverty, and public policy. Retrieved from The Century Foundation: https://production-tcf.imgix.net/app/uploads/2015/08/07182514/Jargowsky_ArchitectureofSegregation-11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Joassart-Marcelli, P. M., Musso, J. A., & Wolch, J. R. (2005). Fiscal consequences of concentrated poverty in a metropolitan region. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(2), 336–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, O. (2012). Relocation programs, opportunities to learn, and the complications of conversion. Review of Educational Research, 82(2), 131–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J. M., Crook, W. P., & Webb, J. R. (2007). Collaboration for the provision of services. Journal of Community Practice, 15(4), 41–71.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Steiner, P. (2016). Quasi-experimental designs for causal inference. Educational Psychologist, 51(3–4), 395–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsley, G. T., Coulton, C. J., & Pettit, K. L. S. (2014). Strengthening communities with neighborhood data. Washington: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Retrieved from https://www.neighborhoodindicators.org/sites/default/files/publications/13805-urban_kingsley.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kneebone, E. (2014). The growth and spread of concentrated poverty, 2000 to 2008–2012. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/interactives/the-growth-and-spread-of-concentrated-poverty-2000-to-2008-2012/
   Google Scholar
• Kneebone, E., & Holmes, N. (2016). U.S. concentrated poverty in the wake of the Great Recession. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/research/u-s-concentrated-poverty-in-the-wake-of-the-great-recession/
   Google Scholar
• Kondo, M., Hohl, B., Han, S. H., & Branas, C. (2016). Effects of greening and community reuse of vacant lots on crime. Urban Studies, 53(15), 3279–3295. doi:10.1177/0042098015608058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupka, D. J., & Noonan, D. S. (2009). Empowerment Zones, neighborhood change and owner-occupied housing. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(4), 386–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubisch, A. C., Auspos, P., Brown, P., & Dewar, T. (2010). Voices from the field III: Lessons and challenges from two decades of community change efforts. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lester, T. W. (2014). Does Chicago’s Tax Increment Financing (TIF) programme pass the “But-for” test? Job creation and economic development impacts using time-series data. Urban Studies, 51(4), 655–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littell, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, J., Duncan, G. J., Gennetian, L. A., Katz, L. F., Kessler, R. C., Kling, J. R., & Sanbonmatsu, L. (2013). Long-term neighborhood effects on low-income families: Evidence from moving to opportunity. American Economic Review, 103(3), 226–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallach, A. (2017). Neighborhoods by numbers: An introduction to finding and using small area data. Flint, MI: Center for Community Progress. Retrieved from http://action.communityprogress.net/p/salsa/web/common/public/signup?signup_page_KEY=10601
   Google Scholar
• Miller, W. R., Brown, J. M., Simpson, T. L., Handmaker, N. S., Bien, T. H., Luckie, L. H., … Tongian, J. (1995). What works? A methodological analysis of the alcohol treatment outcome literature. In R. K. Hester & W. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of alcoholism treatment approaches: Effective alternatives (2nd ed., pp. 12–44). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med, 6(7), e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097
   Google Scholar
• Neumark, D., & Simpson, H. (2015a). Do place-based policies matter? (FRBSF Economic Letters). Retrieved from Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco: https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/files/el2015-07.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Neumark, D., & Simpson, H. (2015b). Place-based policies. In G. Duranton, J. V. Henderson, & W. C. Strange (Eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics (5th ed., pp.1197–1287). Cambridge, MA: Elsevier B.V. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/handbook/handbook-of-regional-and-urban-economics/vol/5/suppl/C
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, D., & Tsao, H. (2007a). Socioeconomic gains and spillover effects of geographically targeted initiatives to combat economic distress: An examination of Chicago’s empowerment zone. Cities, 24(1), 43–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, D., & Tsao, H. (2007b). The bottom-up mandate: Fostering community partnerships and combating economic distress in Chicago’s Empowerment Zone. Urban Studies, 44(4), 819–843. Retrieved from http://usj.sagepub.com/content/by/year
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, D., & Tsao, H. S. (2006). A new way of revitalizing distressed urban communities? Assessing the impact of the federal empowerment zone program. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(5), 443–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, D., Hamilton, V., Egan, M., & Petticrew, M. (2005). Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 1. Finding the evidence: How far should you go? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 804–808. doi:10.1136/jech.2005.034181
   Google Scholar
• Ohmer, M. L., Coulton, C., Freedman, D. A., Sobeck, J. L., & Booth, J. (2019). Measurement for community and neighborhood research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ohmer, M. L., & Korr, W. S. (2006). The effectiveness of community practice interventions: A review of the literature. Research on Social Work Practice, 16(2), 132–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, A. (2017). How do people-based housing policies affect people (and Place)? Housing Policy Debate, 27(2), 266–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide (1st ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pooley, K. B. (2014). Using Community Development Block Grant dollars to revitalize neighborhoods: The impact of program spending in Philadelphia. Housing Policy Debate, 24(1), 172–191. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rhpd20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, M. J., & Stoker, R. P. (2014). Collaborative governance for urban revitalization: Lessons from Empowerment Zones. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi-Hansberg, E., Sarte, P.-D., & Owens III, R. (2010). Housing Externalities. Journal of Political Economy, 118(3), 485–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schechter, J. H. (2011). An empirical evaluation of the model cities program (Bachelor's Thesis). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Schuetz, J., Spader, J., & Cortes, A. (2015). Have distressed neighborhoods recovered? Evidence from the Neighborhood Stabilization Program (Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2015-016). Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, I., Murray, C., & Sard, B. (2015). Basic facts on concentrated poverty. Retrieved from http://www.cbpp.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/11-3-15hous2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sharkey, P. (2013). Stuck in place: Urban neighborhoods and the end of progress toward racial equality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. C. (2003). The impact of community development corporations on neighborhood housing markets: Modeling appreciation. Urban Affairs Review, 39(2), 181–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. M., & Hevener, C. C. (2011). The impact of housing rehabilitation on local neighborhoods: The case of small community development organizations. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 70(1), 50–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. (2015). Empowerment for whom? The impact of community renewal tax incentives on jobs and businesses. Urban Studies, 52(4), 702–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. (2016). Did the community renewal tax incentives pirate businesses from other places? Economic Development Quarterly, 30(1), 46–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spader, J., Schuetz, J., & Cortes, A. (2015). Fewer vacants, fewer crimes? Impacts of neighborhood revitalization policies on crime. Retrieved from Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University: https://www.jchs.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/w15-7_spader_et_al_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tatian, P. A., Kingsley, G. T., Parilla, J., & Pendall, R. (2012). Building successful neighborhoods. Retrieved from Urban Institute: https://www.urban.org/research/publication/building-successful-neighborhoods
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, D. E. (2008). Strategic, geographic targeting of housing and community development resources. Urban Affairs Review, 43(5), 629–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, D. E. (2011). Strategic geographic targeting in community development: Examining the congruence of political, institutional, and technical factors. Urban Affairs Review, 47(4), 564–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trent, T. R., & Chavis, D. M. (2009). Scope, scale, and sustainability: What it takes to create lasting community change. The Foundation Review, 1(1), 96–114.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. A. (2017). Beyond people versus place: A place-conscious framework for investing in housing and neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 27(2), 306–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnham, J., & Bonjorni, J. (2004). Review of neighborhood revitalization initiatives. Retrieved from https://www.issuelab.org/resources/1802/1802.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (n.d.). Community development. Retrieved from https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/comm_planning/communitydevelopment
   Google Scholar
• von Hoffman, A. (2012). The past, present, and future of community development in the United States. In N. O. Andrews, D. J. Erickson, I. J. Galloway, & E. S. Seidman (Eds.), Investing in what works for America’s communities: Essays on people, place & purpose (pp. 10–54). San Francisco, CA: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco & Low Income Investment Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Watson-Thompson, J., Fawcett, S. B., & Schultz, J. A. (2008). Differential effects of strategic planning on community change in two urban neighborhood coalitions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 42(1–2), 25–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S. (2015). Impacts of Enterprise Zone Policy on Industry Growth. Economic Development Quarterly, 29(4), 347–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar