1,104
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Will Mandatory Inclusionary Housing Create Mixed-Income Communities? Evidence From London, UK

ORCID Icon &
Pages 972-993 | Received 10 Jan 2020, Accepted 22 Jun 2020, Published online: 04 Aug 2020

References

  • Bolt, G., Phillips, D., & Van Kempen, R. (2010). Housing policy, (de)segregation and social mixing: An international perspective. Housing Studies, 25(2), 129–135.
  • Brunick, N. (2004). The inclusionary housing debate: The effectiveness of mandatory programs over voluntary programs. Zoning Practice, 9(1), 1–7. Retrieved from https://www.planning.org/zoningpractice/2004/pdf/sep.pdf
  • Buis, M. L. (2012). ZOIB: Stata module to fit a zero-one inflated beta distribution by maximum likelihood (Statistical software components, S457156). Boston College Department of Economics. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s457156.html
  • Calavita, N., Grimes, K., & Mallach, A. (1997). Inclusionary housing in California and New Jersey: A comparative analysis. Housing Policy Debate, 8(1), 109–142.
  • Calavita, N., & Mallach, A. (2010). Inclusionary housing in international perspective: Affordable housing, social inclusion, and land value recapture. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
  • CCRH & NPH. (2007). Affordable by choice: Trends in california inclusionary housing programs. Retrieved from http://media.wix.com/ugd/8d7a46_612ea9cd7114427c97e1edc0f30243ca.pdf
  • Chetty, R., Hendren, N., & Katz, L. F. (2016). The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: New evidence from the moving to opportunity experiment. American Economic Review, 106(4), 855–902.
  • Clapham, D. (2006). Housing policy and the discourse of globalization. European Journal of Housing Policy, 6(1), 55–76.
  • Cook, D. O., Kieschnick, R., & McCullough, B. D. (2008). Regression analysis of proportions in finance with self selection. Journal of Empirical Finance, 15(5), 860–867.
  • Crook, T., Henneberry, J., & Whitehead, C. (2015). Planning gain: Providing infrastructure and affordable housing. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Crook, T., Monk, S., Rowley, S., & Whitehead, C. (2006). Planning gain and the supply of new affordable housing in England: Understanding the numbers. Town Planning Review, 77(3), 353–373.
  • Crook, T., & Whitehead, C. M. (2002). Social housing and planning gain: Is this an appropriate way of providing affordable housing? Environment and Planning A, 34(7), 1259–1279.
  • Crump, J. (2002). Deconcentration by demolition: Public housing, poverty, and urban policy. Environment and Planning D, 20(5), 581–596.
  • Cutler, D. M., & Glaeser, E. L. (1997). Are ghettos good or bad? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(3), 827–872.
  • Cutler, D. M., Glaeser, E. L., & Vigdor, J. L. (2008). When are ghettos bad? Lessons from immigrant segregation in the United States. Journal of Urban Economics, 63(3), 759–774.
  • Davidson, M., & Lees, L. (2010). New‐build gentrification: Its histories, trajectories, and critical geographies. Population, Space and Place, 16(5), 395–411.
  • Dawkins, C. (2013). The spatial pattern of low income housing tax credit properties: Implications for fair housing and poverty deconcentration policies. Journal of the American Planning Association, 79(3), 222–234.
  • DETR. (1998). Planning and affordable housing (Circular 6/98). London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions/HMSO.
  • Diagne, A. F., Kurban, H., & Schmutz, B. (2018). Are inclusionary housing programs color-blind? The case of Montgomery County MPDU program. Journal of Housing Economics, 40, 6–24.
  • Ellen, I. G., Horn, K. M., & O’Regan, K. M. (2016). Poverty concentration and the low income housing tax credit: Effects of siting and tenant composition. Journal of Housing Economics, 34, 49–59.
  • Ellen, I. G., & Turner, M. A. (2003). Do neighborhoods matter and why? In J. Goering & J. D. Feins (Eds.), Choosing a better life? Evaluating the moving to opportunity social experiment (pp. 313–338). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
  • Ferrari, S., & Cribari-Neto, F. (2004). Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. Journal of Applied Statistics, 31(7), 799–815.
  • Freeman, L. (2004). Siting affordable housing (Living cities census series). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
  • Freeman, L., & Schuetz, J. (2017). Producing affordable housing in rising markets: What works? Cityscape, 19(1), 217–236. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/26328307
  • Galster, G. C. (2012). The mechanism (s) of neighbourhood effects: Theory, evidence, and policy implications. In M. V. Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives (pp. 23–56). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  • Galster, G. C., Andersson, R., & Musterd, S. (2015). Are males’ incomes influenced by the income mix of their male neighbors? Explorations into nonlinear and threshold effects in Stockholm. Housing Studies, 30(2), 315–343.
  • Galster, G. C., Santiago, A., & Lucero, J. (2015). Employment of low-income African American and Latino teens: Does neighborhood social mix matter? Housing Studies, 30(2), 192–227.
  • Goering, J., Kamely, A., & Richardson, T. (1997). Recent research on racial segregation and poverty concentration in public housing in the United States. Urban Affairs Review, 32(5), 723–745.
  • Gurran, N., & Bramley, G. (2017). Urban planning and the housing market: International perspectives for policy and practice. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan Limited.
  • Gurran, N., Gilbert, C., Gibb, K. D., van den Nouwelant, R., James, A., & Phibbs, P. (2018). Supporting affordable housing supply: Inclusionary planning in new and renewing communities. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Limited.
  • Hays, R. A. (2012). The federal government and urban housing. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Hickey, R. (2014). Inclusionary upzoning: Tying growth to affordability. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://centerforhousingpolicy.org/Inclusionary-Upzoning.pdf
  • Hickey, R., Sturtevant, L., & Thaden, E. (2014). Achieving lasting affordability through inclusionary housing. Cambridge, MA. Retrieved from http://www.lincolninst.edu/publications/working-papers/achieving-lasting-affordability-through-inclusionary-housing
  • Immergluck, D. (2009). Large redevelopment initiatives, housing values and gentrification: The case of the Atlanta Beltline. Urban Studies, 46(8), 1723–1745.
  • Innovative Housing Institute. (2010). Inclusionary housing survey: Measures of effectiveness. Baltimore, MD. Retrieved from http://www.inhousing.org/resources/inclusionaryhousingsurvey2010/
  • Jacobus, R. (2015). Inclusionary housing: Creating and maintaining equitable communities. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
  • Kleinhans, R., & Van Ham, M. (2013). Lessons learned from the largest tenure-mix operation in the world: Right to buy in the United Kingdom. Cityscape, 15(2), 101–117.
  • Kontokosta, C. E. (2014). Mixed-income housing and neighborhood integration: Evidence from inclusionary zoning programs. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(4), 716–741.
  • Kontokosta, C. E. (2015). Do inclusionary zoning policies equitably disperse affordable housing? A comparative spatial analysis. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 30(4), 569–590.
  • Lépore, E., & Simpson Lapp, S. (2018). Concentrated poverty and neighbourhood effects: Youth marginalisation in Buenos Aires’ informal settlements. Oxford Development Studies, 46(1), 28–44.
  • Lerman, B. R. (2006). Mandatory inclusionary zoning-the answer to the affordable housing problem. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 33(2), 383–416. Retrieved from http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1092&context=ealr
  • Levy, D. K., Comey, J., & Padilla, S. (2006). Keeping the neighborhood affordable: A handbook of housing strategies for gentrifying areas. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
  • Levy, D. K., Comey, J., & Padilla, S. (2007). In the face of gentrification: Case studies of local efforts to mitigate displacement. Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law, 16(3), 238–315.
  • London Borough of Camden. (2006). Unitary development plan. London, UK: London Borough of Camden.
  • London Borough of Richmond upon Thames. (2014). Supplementary planning document: Affordable housing. London, UK: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames.
  • London Borough of Southwark. (2008). Affordable housing supplementary planning document. London, UK: London Borough of Southwark.
  • Ludwig, J., Duncan, G. J., Gennetian, L. A., Katz, L. F., Kessler, R. C., Kling, J. R., & Sanbonmatsu, L. (2013). Long-term neighborhood effects on low-income families: Evidence from moving to opportunity. American Economic Review, 103(3), 226–231.
  • Mallach, A., & Calavita, N. (2010). United States: From radical innovation to mainstream housing policy. In N. Calavita & A. Mallach (Eds.), Inclusionary housing in international perspective: Affordable housing, social inclusion, and land value recapture (pp. 15–77). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
  • Massey, D. S., & Kanaiaupuni, S. M. (1993). Public housing and the concentration of poverty. Social Science Quarterly, 74(1), 109–122.
  • Mayor of London. (2004). The London plan: Spatial development strategy for Greater London. London, UK: Greater London Authority.
  • Mayor of London. (2019). Housing in London: 2019. London: Greater London Authority.
  • McAllister, P., Street, E., & Wyatt, P. (2013). Inside the black box: Unravelling the development viability appraisal process. Working Papers in Real Estate & Planning 12/13. Reading, UK: University of Reading.
  • Metzger, M. W., & Khare, A. T. (2017). Fair housing and inclusive communities. Grand challenge: Achieve equal opportunity and justice (Working paper no. 24). Retrieved from https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1774&context=csd_research
  • Mukhija, V., Regus, L., Slovin, S., & Das, A. (2010). Can inclusionary zoning be an effective and efficient housing policy? Evidence from Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(2), 229–252.
  • Musterd, S. (2005). Social and ethnic segregation in Europe: Levels, causes, and effects. Journal of Urban Affairs, 27(3), 331–348.
  • Musterd, S., & Andersson, R. (2005). Housing mix, social mix, and social opportunities. Urban Affairs Review, 40(6), 761–790.
  • Oakes, J. M., Andrade, K. E., Biyoow, I. M., & Cowan, L. T. (2015). Twenty years of neighborhood effect research: An assessment. Current Epidemiology Reports, 2(1), 80–87.
  • Oakley, D. (2008). Locational patterns of low-income housing tax credit developments a sociospatial analysis of four metropolitan areas. Urban Affairs Review, 43(5), 599–628.
  • ODPM. (2000). Planning policy guidance 3: Housing. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister/HMSO.
  • Owens, A. (2015). Assisted housing and income segregation among neighborhoods in US Metropolitan Areas. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 660(1), 98–116.
  • Owens, A. (2017). How do people-based housing policies affect people (and place)? Housing Policy Debate, 27(2), 266–281.
  • Park, M. (2013). Housing vouchers as a means of poverty deconcentration and race desegregation: Patterns and factors of voucher recipients’ spatial concentration in Cleveland. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 28(3), 451–468.
  • Powell, B., & Stringham, E. P. (2004). Housing supply and affordability: Do affordable housing mandates work? (Reason Foundation policy study 318). Los Angeles: Reason Public Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://reason.org/files/6f862323a38147b4cdb3282ccb9ccbc2.pdf
  • Read, D., & Sanderford, D. (2017). Examining five common criticisms of mixed-income housing development found in the real estate, public policy, and urban planning literatures. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 25(1), 31–48.
  • Rose, K. (2002). Combating gentrification through equitable development. Race, Poverty & the Environment, 9(1), 5–56. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/41554331
  • Ryan, S., & Enderle, B. E. (2012). Examining spatial patterns in affordable housing: The case of California density bonus implementation. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 27(4), 413–425.
  • Schuetz, J., & Meltzer, R. (2012). Inclusionary zoning to support affordable housing. In S. J. Smith (Ed.), International encyclopedia of housing and home (pp. 32–36). San Diego: Elsevier.
  • Schuetz, J., Meltzer, R., & Been, V. (2009). 31 Flavors of inclusionary zoning: Comparing policies from San Francisco, Washington, DC, and Suburban Boston. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(4), 441–456.
  • Schuetz, J., Meltzer, R., & Been, V. (2011). Silver bullet or Trojan horse? The effects of inclusionary zoning on local housing markets in the United States. Urban Studies, 48(2), 297–329.
  • Schwartz, H. L., Ecola, L., Leuschner, K. J., & Kofner, A. (2012). Is Inclusionary zoning inclusionary? A guide for practitioners. Santa Monica, CA. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/technical_reports/2012/RAND_TR1231.pdf
  • South, S. J., & Crowder, K. D. (1999). Neighborhood effects on family formation: Concentrated poverty and beyond. American Sociological Review, 64(1), 113–132.
  • Trillo, C. (2020a). Housing policies and sustainable development. In W. Leal Filho, A. Marisa Azul, L. Brandli, P. Gökçin Özuyar, & T. Wall (Eds.), Sustainable cities and communities (pp. 267–275). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Trillo, C. (2020b). Mixed Income Housing (MIH). In W. Leal Filho, A. Marisa Azul, L. Brandli, P. Gökçin Özuyar, & T. Wall (Eds.), Sustainable cities and communities (pp. 396–403). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Trombka, A., Faden, M., Healy, S., Michaelson, M., Wilson, R., & Roman, S. (2004). Strengthening the moderately priced dwelling unit program: A 30 year review. Rockville, MD: Montgomery County Council.
  • Tunstall, R., & Lupton, R. (2010). Mixed communities: Evidence review. London, UK: Department for Communities and Local Government.
  • Valdez, A., Kaplan, C. D., & Curtis, R. L., Jr. (2007). Aggressive crime, alcohol and drug use, and concentrated poverty in 24 US urban areas. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 33(4), 595–603.
  • van Kempen, R., & Bolt, G. (2009). Social cohesion, social mix, and urban policies in the Netherlands. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24(4), 457–475.
  • Van Zandt, S., & Mhatre, P. C. (2009). Growing pains: Perpetuating inequality through the production of low-income housing in the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex. Urban Geography, 30(5), 490–513.
  • Whitehead, C. M. (1993). Privatizing housing: An assessment of UK experience. Housing Policy Debate, 4(1), 101–139.
  • Whitehead, C. M. (2007). Planning policies and affordable housing: England as a successful case study? Housing Studies, 22(1), 25–44.
  • Williams, D. R., & Collins, C. (2001). Racial residential segregation: A fundamental cause of racial disparities in health. Public Health Reports, 116(5), 404–416.
  • Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.