Effects of Proximity to Multifamily Housing on Property Values in Little Rock, Arkansas, 2000–2016

References

• Alexander, E. (2001). A transaction cost theory of land use planning and development control: Towards the institutional analysis of public planning. Town Planning Review, 72(1), 45–75.
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R. M. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Besson, E. (2016, September 21). Proposed West Little Rock apartment complex rejected. Arkansas Democrat Gazette. Retrieved from https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2016/sep/21/bowman-road-complex-rejected-20160921/
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. D., Darden, J. T., & Aidala, A. (1999). In the wake of desegregation: Early impacts of scattered-site public housing on neighborhoods in Yonkers, New York. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(1), 27–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. D.-S., & Mueller, E. J. (1997). From neighborhood to community: Evidence on the effects of community development. New York: Community Development Research Center, New School for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Buckman, S. (2011). Upper Middle Class NIMBY in Phoenix: The community dynamics of the development process in the Arcadia neighborhood. Journal of Community Practice, 19, 308–325.
   Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E. (2004). A transaction-cost analysis of the land development process. Urban Studies, 41(3), 2539–2553.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, P. M., & Landis, J. D. (1993). Relationships between affordable housing developments and neighboring property values: An analysis of BRIDGE Housing Corporation developments in the San Francisco Bay Area. Working Paper No. 599. University of California at Berkeley, Institute of Urban and Regional Development.
   Google Scholar
• Dear, M. (1992). Understanding and overcoming the NIMBY syndrome. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(3), 288–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, L. (2011). The external neighborhood effects of low-income housing tax credit projects built by three sectors. Journal of Urban Affairs, 33(2), 143–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di, W., Ma, J., & Murdoch, J. C. (2010). An analysis of the neighborhood impacts of a mortgage assistance program: A spatial hedonic model. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29(4), 682–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiPasquale, D., & Glaeser, E. (1999). Incentives and Social Capital: Are homeowners better citizens? Journal of Urban Economics, 45, 354–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, C. (2020). Golden gates: Fighting for housing in America. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. The Annals of Statistics, 7(1), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellen, I. G., Schwartz, A. E., Voicu, I., & Schill, M. H. (2007). Does federally subsidized rental housing depress neighborhood property values? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(2), 257–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischel, W. (2001). The homevoter hypothesis: How home values influence local government taxation, school finance, and land use policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L., & Botein, H. (2002). Subsidized housing and neighborhood impacts: A theoretical discussion and review of the evidence. Journal of Planning Literature, 16(3), 359–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C., Tatian, P., & Smith, R. (1999). The impact of neighbors who use Section 8 certificates on property values. Housing Policy Debate, 10(4), 879–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, E., Lam, H. K., & Heitlinger, A. (1996). There goes the neighborhood? Subsidized housing in urban neighborhoods. Working paper 26(1), 1–6. Center for Regional and Urban Affairs, University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, J. (2006). Houses, apartments, and the incidence of property taxes. Housing Policy Debate, 17(1), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halverson, R., & Palmquist, R. (1980). The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. The American Economic Review, 70(3), 474–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, D. R. (1999). Property values drop when Blacks move in, because … . American Sociological Review, 64(3), 461–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckathorn, D. (1993). Collective action and group heterogeneity: Voluntary provision versus selective incentives. American Sociological Review, 58(3), 329–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iceland, J. (2013). Poverty in America: A handbook (3rd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Transportation Engineers. (2003). Trip generation (7th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koschinsky, J. (2009). Spatial heterogeneity in spillover effects of assisted and unassisted rental housing. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31(3), 319–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreps, D., Milgrom, P., Roberts, J., & Wilson, R. (1982). Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners’ dilemma. Journal of Economic Theory, 27(2), 245–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. M., Culhane, D. P., & Wachter, S. M. (1999). The differential impacts of federally assisted housing programs on nearby property values: A Philadelphia case study. Housing Policy Debate, 10(1), 75–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lens, M. (2013). Subsidized housing and crime: Theory, mechanisms, and evidence. Journal of Planning Literature, 28(4), 352–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, R. F., & Loveridge, S. (1993). An hedonic estimation of the effect of federally subsidized housing on nearby residential property values. Staff Paper P93-6. Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Metroplan. (2014). Fair housing equity assessment. Retrieved from http://metroplan.org/sites/default/files/media/longRangePlan/2014-12-ICA-AppendixJ-FHEAreport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Metroplan. (2017a). Metro trends: Demographic review and outlook. Retrieved from http://metroplan.org/sites/default/files/media/publications/DemographicReview2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Metroplan. (2017b). Metro trends: Economic review and outlook. Retrieved from http://metroplan.org/sites/default/files/media/publications/2017-EconomicReview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. D. (1995). Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13(2), 151–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minicozzi, J. (2012). The smart math of mixed-use development. Retrieved from https://www.planetizen.com/node/53922
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, C. Z., & Duval, R. D. (1993). Bootstrapping: A nonparametric approach to statistical inference. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Morenoff, J., Sampson, R., & Raudenbush, S. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology, 39(3), 517–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, M., Basolo, V., & Tiwari, A. (2013). Opposition to affordable housing in the USA: Debate framing and the responses of local actors. Housing Theory and Society, 30(2), 107–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, D. T. (2018). The urban commons: How data and technology can rebuild our communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, W. E. (1969). The effects of property taxes and local public spending on property values: An empirical study of tax capitalization and the Tiebout hypothesis. Journal of Political Economy, 77, 957–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obrinsky, M., & Stein, D. (2006). Overcoming opposition to multifamily rental housing. Joint Center for Housing Studies at Harvard University, Report RR07-14. Retrieved from http://www.jchs.harvard.edu/research/publications/overcoming-opposition-multifamily-rental-housing
   Google Scholar
• Pendall, R. (1999). Opposition to housing: NIMBY and beyond. Urban Affairs Review, 35(1), 112–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rohe, W., & Stewart, L. (1996). Homeownership and neighborhood stability. Housing Policy Debate, 7(1), 37–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saegert, S., & Winkel, G. (1998). Social capital and the revitalization of New York City’s distressed inner-city housing. Housing Policy Debate, 9(1), 17–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. (2012). Great American City: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Santiago, A. M., Galster, G. C., & Tatian, P. (2001). Assessing the property value impacts of the dispersed subsidy housing program in Denver. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(1), 65–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scally, C. (2013). The Nuances of NIMBY: Context and perceptions of affordable rental housing development. Urban Affairs Review, 49(5), 718–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 143–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. E., Ellen, I. G., Voicu, I., & Schill, M. H. (2006). The external effects of place-based subsidized housing. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36(6), 679–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, Y., & Craw, M. (2017). Is something better than nothing? The impact of foreclosed and lease-purchase properties on residential property values. Urban Studies, 54, 3681–3699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. (2001). Breaking away from broken windows: Baltimore neighborhoods and the nationwide fight against crime, grime, fear, and decline. New York: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2019). Addressing housing affordability in high-cost metropolitan areas in the United States. Office of Policy Development and Research. Retrieved from https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/pdf/Addressing-Housing-Affordability-High-Cost-Metropolitan-Areas.pdf
   Google Scholar
• von Hoffman, A., Belsky, E., DeNormandie, J., & Bratt, R. (2004). America’s working communities and the impact of multifamily housing. Joint Center for Housing Studies at Harvard University and the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.jchs.harvard.edu/research/publications/americas-working-communities-and-impact-multifamily-housing
   Google Scholar
• Ward, M., & Gleditsch, K. S. (2008). Spatial regression models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar