REFERENCES
- Arcavi, A. 1994. Symbol sense: Informal sense-making in formal mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics. 14(3): 24–35.
- Boaler, J. 1998. Open and closed mathematics: Student experiences and understandings. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 29(1): 41–62.
- Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Second Edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Coxford, A. F., J. T. Fey, C. R. Hirsch, H. L. Schoen, G. Burrill, E. W. Hart, and A. E. Watkins. 1998. Contemporary Mathematics in Context: A Unified Approach (Course 2). Columbus, OH: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill.
- Dey, E. L., H. E. Burn, and D. Gerdes. 2009. Bringing the classroom to the web: Effects of using new technologies to capture and deliver lectures. Research in Higher Education. 50(4): 377–393.
- Erlwanger, S. H. 1973. Benny’s concepts of rules and answers in IPI mathematics. Journal of Children’s Mathematical Behavior. 1: 7–26.
- Fey, J. T. 1990. Quantity. In L. A. Steen ( Ed.), One the Shoulders of Giants: New Approaches to Numeracy, pp. 61–94. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Gonzalez-Muniz, M., L. Klingler, S. Moosai, and D. Raviv. 2012. Taking a college algebra course: An approach that increased students’ success rate. PRIMUS. 22(3): 201–213.
- Hagerty, G. and S. Smith. 2005. Using the web-based interactive software ALEKS to enhance college algebra. Mathematics and Computer Education. 39(3): 183–194.
- Hagerty, G., S. Smith, and D. Goodwin. 2010. Redesigning college algebra: Combining educational theory and web-based learning to improve student attitudes and performance. PRIMUS. 20(5): 418–437.
- Hiebert, J. and D. A. Grouws. 2007. The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester ( Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, Vol. 1, pp. 371–404. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
- Hodges, C. B. and J. M. Brill. 2007. Developing a training program for instructional assistants within a large-scale emporium-based environment: A nine-year evolution towards systemic change. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 19(1): 93–104.
- Kendricks, K. D. 2011. Creating a supportive environment to enhance computer based learning for underrepresented minorities in college algebra classrooms. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 11(4): 12–25.
- Kodippili, A. and D. Senaratne. 2008. Is computer-generated interactive mathematics homework more effective than traditional instructor-graded homework? British Journal of Educational Technology. 39(5): 928–932.
- Potocka, K. 2010. An entirely-online developmental mathematics course: Creation and outcomes. PRIMUS. 20(6): 498–516.
- Sebrechts, M., M. Enright, R. E. Bennett, and K. Martin. 1996. Using algebra word problems to assess quantitative ability: Attributes, strategies, and errors. Cognition and Instruction. 14(3): 285–343.
- Sfard, A. 1991. On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 22(1): 1–36.
- Sfard, A. and L. Linchevski. 1994. The gains and pitfalls of reification – The case of algebra. In P. Cobb ( Ed.), Learning Mathematics: Constructivist and Interactionist Theories of Mathematical Development, pp. 87–124. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Taylor, J. M. 2008. The effects of a computerized-algebra program on mathematics achievement of college and university freshmen enrolled in a developmental mathematics course. Journal of College Reading and Learning. 39(1): 35–53.
- Twigg, C. A. 2011. The math emporium: Higher education’s silver bullet. Change. 43(3): 25–34.
- Yerushalmy, M. 2000. Problem solving strategies and mathematical resources: A longitudinal view on problem solving in a function based approach to algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 43(2): 125–147.