Effects of Clicker Use on Calculus Students’ Mathematics Anxiety

REFERENCES

• Adams, N. A. and W. R. Holcomb. 1986. Analysis of the relationship between anxiety about mathematics and performance. Psychological Reports. 59(2): 943–948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, M. H. 2002. Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 11(5): 181–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, H., L. Wang, W. Pan, and M. Frey. 2009. Measuring mathematics anxiety: Psychometric analysis of a bidimensional affective scale. Journal of Instructional Psychology. 36(3): 185–193.
   Google Scholar
• Bandalos, D. L., K. Yates, and T. Thorndike-Christ. 1995. Effects of math self-concept, perceived self-efficacy, and attributions for failure and success on test anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology. 87(4): 611–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessant, K. C. 1995. Factors associated with types of mathematics anxiety in college students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 26(4): 327–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, N. E. 1978. Prevalence, distribution, and correlates of math anxiety in college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 25(5): 441–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, M., D. Drane, Y. B. Kolikant, and M. Schuller. 2009. A clicker approach to teaching calculus. Notices of the American Mathematical Society. 56(2): 253–256.
   Google Scholar
• Bruff, D. 2009. Teaching with Classroom Response Systems: Creating Active Learning Environments. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, M., L. Pyzdrowski, V. L. Walker, and S. Yoho. 2010. Studying personal response systems in a college algebra course. Investigations in Mathematics Learning. 2(2): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, J. E. 2007. Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. Cell Biology Education. 6(1): 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Cline, K., M. Parker, H. Zullo, and A. Stewart. 2013. Addressing common student errors with classroom voting in multivariable calculus. PRIMUS. 23(1): 60–75.
   Google Scholar
• Cline, K., H. Zullo, and M. Parker. 2008. Using classroom voting in mathematics courses. In J. Foster (Ed.), Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Technology in Collegiate Mathematics, pp. 35–39. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Cline, K. S. 2006. Classroom voting in mathematics. Mathematics Teacher. 100(2): 100–104.
   Google Scholar
• Clute, P. S. 1984. Mathematics anxiety, instructional method, and achievement in a survey course in college mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 15(1): 50–58.
   Google Scholar
• Dew, K. M., J. P. Galassi, and M. D. Galassi. 1983. Mathematics anxiety: Some basic issues. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 30(3): 443–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Inverno, R., H. Davis, and S. White. 2003. Using a personal response system for promoting student interaction. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications. 22(4): 163–169.
   Google Scholar
• Dreger, R. M. and L. R. Aiken. 1957. The identification of number anxiety in a college population. Journal of Educational Psychology. 48(6): 344–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennema, E. and J. Sherman. 1977. Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization and affective factors. American Educational Research Journal. 14(1): 51–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fies, C. and J. Marshall. 2006. Classroom response systems: A review of the literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 15(1): 101–109.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, L. R. 2011. An example of multi-purpose use of clickers in college algebra. In K. Cline and H. Zullo ( Eds), Teaching Mathematics with Classroom Voting: With and Without Clickers, pp. 93–99. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, M. F. 1954. Mathemaphobia: Causes and treatments. The Clearing House. 28(5): 290–294.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, K., K. Owens, X. Liang, and D. Steer. 2012. Assessing multimedia influences on student responses using a personal response system. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 21(3): 392–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hembree, R. 1990. The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 21(1): 33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, H., D. Senturk, A. G. Lam, J. M. Zimmer, S. Hong, Y. Okamoto, S. Chiu, Y. Nakazawa, and C. Wang. 2000. The affective and cognitive dimensions of math anxiety: A cross-national study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 31(3): 362–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, B. 2010. “I think I can, but I’m afraid to try”: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and mathematics anxiety in mathematics problem-solving efficiency. Learning and Individual Differences. 20(3): 276–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ironsmith, M., J. Marva, B. Harju, and M. Eppler. 2003. Motivation and performance in college students enrolled in self-paced versus lecture-format remedial mathematics courses. Journal of Instructional Psychology. 30(4): 276–284.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, S. and M. Dowson. 2009. Mathematics anxiety as a function of multidimensional self-regulation and self-efficacy. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 34(3): 240–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchens, A. N. 1995. Defeating Math Anxiety. Chicago, IL: Irwin Career Education Division.
   Google Scholar
• Kogelman, S. and J. Warren. 1978. Mind over Math: Put Yourself on the Road to Success by Freeing Yourself from Math Anxiety. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Kolikant, Y. B., D. Drane, and S. Calkins. 2010. “Clickers” as catalysts for transformation of teachers. College Teaching. 58(4): 127–135.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, K. H. 2011. Addressing the multiplication makes bigger and division makes smaller misconceptions via prediction and clickers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 42(8): 1081–1106.
   Google Scholar
• Lock, P. F. 2011. Using clickers to enhance learning in upper-level mathematics courses. In K. Cline and H. Zullo ( Eds), Teaching Mathematics with Classroom Voting: With and Without Clickers, pp. 159–165. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, A. 2009. Using peer instruction and i-clickers to enhance student participation in calculus. PRIMUS. 19(3): 219–231.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, X. and N. Kishor. 1997. Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 28(1): 26–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGivney, R. J. and J. McGivney-Burelle. 2011. Questions to engage students in discussion (Q.E.D.): Using clickers in a mathematics for liberal arts course. In K. Cline and H. Zullo ( Eds), Teaching Mathematics with Classroom Voting: With and Without Clickers, pp. 37–42. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. B. 1988. Affective issues in mathematical problem solving: Some theoretical considerations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 19(2): 134–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. 1987. Math Anxiety: What it is and What to do about it. Tempe, AZ: Action Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. and T. Urdan. 1996. Exploratory factor analysis of the Mathematics Anxiety Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 29(1): 35–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popelka, S. R. 2010. Now we’re really clicking! Mathematics Teacher. 104(4): 290–295.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, H., J. Viehe, and S. Segal. 1982. Is math anxiety a local phenomenon? A study of prevalence and dimensionality. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 29(1): 39–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retkute, R. 2009. Exploring technology-based continuous assessment via electronic voting systems in mathematics and statistics. MSOR Connections. 9(1): 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, F. C. and R. M. Suinn. 1972. The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 19(6): 551–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. and S. King. 2009. Introducing electronic voting systems into the teaching of mathematics. MSOR Connections. 9(1): 29–33.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, K. A. 2012. Assessing clicker examples versus board examples in calculus. PRIMUS. 22(5): 353–364.
   Google Scholar
• Rounds, J. B. and D. D. Hendel. 1980. Measurement and dimensionality of mathematics anxiety. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 27(2): 138–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serros, S., E. Hofacker, and K. Ernie. 2011. Using clickers in professional development workshops. In K. Cline and H. Zullo ( Eds), Teaching Mathematics with Classroom Voting: With and Without Clickers, pp. 83–86. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, A. 2011. Enhancing student participation and attitudes in a large-lecture calculus course. In K. Cline and H. Zullo ( Eds), Teaching Mathematics with Classroom Voting: With and Without Clickers, pp. 121–126. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Strasser, N. 2010. Who wants to pass math? Using clickers in calculus. Journal of College Teaching and Learning. 7(3): 49–52.
   Google Scholar
• Suinn, R. M. and E. H. Winston. 2003. The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale, a brief version: Psychometric data. Psychological Reports. 92(1): 167–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titman, A. C. and G. A. Lancaster. 2011. Personal response systems for teaching postgraduate statistics to small groups. Journal of Statistics Education. 19(2): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Tobias, S. 1993. Overcoming Math Anxiety. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Tobias, S. and C. Weissbrod. 1980. Anxiety and mathematics: An update. Harvard Educational Review. 50(1): 63–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A. and J. L. Meece. 1988. Math anxiety in elementary and secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology. 80(2): 210–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woelk, K. 2008. Optimizing the use of personal response devices (clickers) in large-enrollment introductory courses. Journal of Chemical Education. 85(10): 1400–1405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaslavsky, C. 1994. Fear of Math: How to Get Over it and Get on with Your Life. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar