REFERENCES
- Bagley, S. 2014. Improving student success in calculus: A comparison of four college calculus classes. Ph.D. Thesis. San Diego, CA: San Diego State University. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Accession Order No. 3633127).
- Deslauriers, L., E. Schelew, and C. Wieman. 2011. Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science. 332(6031): 862–864.
- Ellis, J., C. Rasmussen, and K. Duncan. 2013. Switcher and persister experiences in calculus I. In S. Brown, G. Karakok, K.H. Roh, and M. Oehrtman (eds.) Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, pp. 102–106.
- Epstein, J. 2013. The calculus concept inventory: Measurement of the effect of teaching methodology in mathematics. Notices of the American Mathematical Society. 60(8): 1018–1026.
- Froyd, J. 2008. White paper on promising practices in undergraduate STEM education. Paper presented at the National Research Council’s Workshop Linking Evidence to Promising Practices in STEM Undergraduate Education, Washington, DC.
- Gannod, G., J. Burge, and M. Helmick. 2008. Using the inverted classroom to teach software engineering. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 777–786. New York: ACM.
- Hake, R. 1998. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics. 66(1): 64–74.
- Kogan, M. and S. Laursen. 2014. Assessing long-term effects of inquiry-based learning: A case study from college mathematics. Innovative Higher Education 39(3): 183–199.
- Lay, D. 2011. Linear Algebra and its Applications. New York: Pearson/Addison-Wesley.
- Moravec, M., A. Williams, N. Aguilar-Roca, and D. O’Dowd. 2010. Learn before lecture: A strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class. CBE Life Sciences Education. 9(4): 473–481.
- Prunuske, A., J. Batzli, E. Howell, and S. Miller. 2012. Using online lectures to make time for active learning. Genetics. 192(1): 67–72.
- Schwartz, D., and J. Bransford. 1998. A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction. 16 (4): 475–522.
- Springer, L., M. Stanne, and S. Donovan. 1999. Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research. 69(1): 21–51.
- Talbert, R. 2014. Inverting the linear algebra classroom. PRIMUS. 24(5): 361–374.
- Watkins, J. and E. Mazur. 2013. Retaining students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors. Journal of College Science Teaching. 42: 36–41.