Making Real Analysis Relevant to Secondary Teachers: Building Up from and Stepping Down to Practice

REFERENCES

• Ball, D. L., M. H. Thames, and G. Phelps. 2008. Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education. 59(5): 389–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossé, M. J., H. Ries, and K. Chandler. 2012. Putting the modern in algebra. PRIMUS. 23(1): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Conference Board of Mathematical Sciences. 2001. The Mathematical Education of Teachers. Providence, RI and Washington, DC: American Mathematical Society and Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Conference Board of Mathematical Sciences. 2012. The Mathematical Education of Teachers II. Providence, RI and Washington, DC: American Mathematical Society and Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2000. Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives. 8(1) :1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, P. M. 2006. Advanced Calculus, Second Edition. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Goulding, M., G. Hatch, and M. Rodd. 2003. Undergraduate mathematics experience: Its significance in secondary mathematics teacher preparation. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 6(4): 361–393.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J. G. 2011. Education and certification qualifications of departmentalized public high school-level teachers of core subjects: Evidence from the 2007-2008 schools and staffing survey, report (NCES 2011–317 U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics).
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, A., M. H. Thames, C. M. Ribeiro, and S. Delaney. 2012. Using practice to define and distinguish horizon content knowledge. In Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education, pp. 4635–4644. Seoul, South Korea: International Commission on Mathematical Instruction.
   Google Scholar
• Lobato, J. 2012. The actor-oriented transfer perspective and its contributions to educational research and practice. Educational Psychologist. 47(3): 232–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrory, R., R. Floden, J. Ferrini-Mundy, M. D. Reckase, and S. L. Senk. 2012. Knowledge of algebra for teaching: A framework of knowledge and practices. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 43(5): 584–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejia-Ramos, J. P., E. Fuller, K. Weber, K. Rhoads, and A. Samkoff. 2012. An assessment model for proof comprehension in undergraduate mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 79(1): 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monk, D. H. 1994. Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review. 13(2): 125–145.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. and G. Salomon. 2002. International Encyclopedia of Education, Transfer of Learning, Second Edition. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, A. B. and E. Hanna. 2006. Understanding teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching: A theoretical and methodological approach. In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kratka, and N. Stehlikova (Eds), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education,Vol. 4, pp. 369–376. Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoads, K. 2014. High school mathematics teachers’ use of beliefs and knowledge in high quality instruction. Ph.D. Thesis. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, T., P. Huckstep, and A. Thwaites.2005. Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: The knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 8(3): 255–281.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, K. 2008. Mathematics for secondary teaching: Four components of discipline knowledge for a changing teacher workforce. In P. Sullivan and T. Wood (Eds), The International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education: Knowledge and Beliefs in Mathematics Teaching and Teaching Development, Vol. 1, pp. 87–113. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Stylianides, A. J. and G. J. Stylianides. 2014. Viewing “mathematics for teaching” as a form of applied mathematics: Implications for the mathematical preparation of teachers. Notices of the American Mathematical Society. 61(3); 266–276.
   Google Scholar
• TeachingWorks. 2013. High-leverage practices. http://www.teachingworks.org/work-of-teaching/high-leverage-practices. Accessed March 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ticknor, C. S. 2012. Situated learning in an abstract algebra classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 81(3): 307–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, N., M. Villanueva, J. P. Mejia-Ramos, and K. Weber. 2015. Secondary mathematics teachers’ perceptions of real analysis in relation to their teaching practice. Presented at the Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (RUME), Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Zazkis, R. and R. Leikin. 2010. Advanced mathematical knowledge in teaching practice: Perceptions of secondary mathematics teachers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning. 12(4): 263–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar