Calculus Students Flipped Out: The Impact of Flipped Learning on Calculus Students' Achievement and Perceptions of Learning

REFERENCES

• Adams, C. and A. Dove. 2016. Flipping calculus: The potential influence, and the lessons learned. Electronic Journal of Mathematics and Technology (eJMT). 10(3): 154–164.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J. and A. Sams. 2012. Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. 2007. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., R. Wei, A. Andree, N. Richardson, and S. Orphanos. 2009. Professional Learning in Profession. Washington, DC: National Staff Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Dove, A. and E. Dove. 2015a. Examining the influence of a flipped mathematics course on preservice elementary teachers' mathematics anxiety and achievement. Electronic Journal of Mathematics & Technology (eJMT). 9(2): 166–179.
   Google Scholar
• Dove, A. and E. Dove. 2015b. Flipped mathematics classroom: What? Why? & How? Virginia Mathematics Teacher. 42(1): 36–40.
   Google Scholar
• Dove, A. and E. Dove. 2015c. Examining the influence of a flipped mathematics course on preservice elementary teachers' mathematics anxiety and achievement. Research Journal of Mathematics & Technology. 4(2): 48–63.
   Google Scholar
• Dove, A. and K. Hollanbrands. 2013. A teacher's scaffolding of students' learning of geometry while using a dynamic geometry program. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science & Technology. 45(5): 668–681.
   Google Scholar
• Frand, J. 2000. The information-age mindset: Changes in students and implications for higher education. EDUCAUSE. 35: 14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, K. 2012. Upside down and inside out: Flip your classroom to improve student learning. Learning & Leading with Technology. 39(8): 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, D., E. Pietri, G. Anderson, K. Moyano-Camihort, and M. Graham. 2015. Increased preclass preparation underlies student outcome improvement in the flipped classoom. CBE – Life Sciences Education. 14(4): 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, S., M. Beal, C. Lamb, D. Sonderegger, and D. Baumgartel. 2015. Flipping undergraduate finite mathematics: Findings and implications. PRIMUS. 25(9-10): 814–832.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, N. and W. Strauss. 2000. Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. 2013. Student perceptions of the flipped classroom. Ph.D. Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver. https://circle.ubc.ca/bitstream/handle/2429/44070/ubc_2013_spring_johnson_graham.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 5 November 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Love, B., A. Hodge, N. Grandgenett, and A. Swift. 2014. Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 45(3): 317–324.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, G., T. Shurman, and K. Cook. 2013. Inverting (flipping) classrooms – Advantages and challenges. In Proceedings of the 120th ASEE Conference & Expositions. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Engineering Education. https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/20/papers/7171/view. Accessed 5 July 2017.
   Google Scholar
• McGivney-Burelle, J. and F. Xue. 2013. Flipping calculus. PRIMUS. 23(5): 477–486.
   Google Scholar
• Monaco, M. and Martin, M. 2007. The millennial student: A new generation of learners. Athletic Training Education Journal. 2: 42–46.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, D., T. Koziniec, and T. McGill. 2015. Student perceptions of flipped learning. In Proceedings of the 17th Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE 2015). http://crpit.com/confpapers/CRPITV160Murray.pdf. Accessed 10 December 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Petress, K. 2008. What is meant by “Active Learning?” Education. 128(4): 566–569.
   Google Scholar
• Price, C. 2009. Why don't my students think I'm groovy. Teaching Professor. 23(7): 7–8.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoads, T., T. Murphy, and D. Trytten. 2005. A study of gender parity: Department culture from the students' perspective. In Proceedings of 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. F2G-1–F2G-6. Indianapolis, IN: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Sahin, A., B. Cavlazoglu, and Y. Zeytuncu. 2015. Flipping a college calculus course: A case study. Educational Technology & Society. 18(3): 142–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stowell, J. and J. Nelson. 2007. Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning, and emotion. Teaching of Psychology. 34: 253–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The College Board Advanced Placement Program. 2009. 2008 AP Calculus AB and AP Calculus BC: Released Exams. New York: The College Board.
   Google Scholar
• Traphagan, T., J. Kucsera, and K. Kishi. 2010. Impact of class lecture webcasting on attendance and learning. Educational Technology Research & Development. 58(1): 19–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar