Communicating to Learn Multivariable Calculus: Students' Blackboard Presentations as a Means for Enhancing Mathematics Learning

REFERENCES

• Anthony, G., B. Kaur, M. Ohtani, and D. Clarke. 2013. Student Voice in Mathematics Classrooms around the World (Introduction). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Artemeva, N. and J. Fox. 2011. The writing's on the board: The global and the local in teaching undergraduate mathematics through chalk talk. Written Communication. 28: 345–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R. 2009. Theoretical, conceptual, methodological, and instructional issues in research on metacognition and self-regulated learning: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning. 4: 87–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, D. and C. Campbell. 2004. Fostering the development of mathematical thinking: Observations from a proofs course. PRIMUS. 14(4): 345–353.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. and C. Tang. 2011. Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchele, S. F. 2005. Increased student participation in a discrete mathematics course. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges. 20(4): 68–76.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Y., K. Guo, L. Ding, and I. Ah Chee Mok. 2013. Students at the Front: Examples from a Beijing Classroom. In B. Kaur, G. Anthony, M. Ohtani, and D. Clarke. (Eds), Student Voice in Mathematics Classrooms around the World, pp. 53–64. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Capaldi, M. 2014. Non-traditional methods of teaching abstract algebra. PRIMUS. 24(1): 12–24.
   Google Scholar
• Croft, A. and J. Ward. 2001. A modern and interactive approach to learning engineering mathematics. British Journal of Educational Technology. 32(2): 195–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CUPM. 2004. Curriculum Guide to Majors in the Mathematical Sciences. http://www.maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/CUPM/cupm2004.pdf. Accessed 10 September 2016.
   Google Scholar
• CUPM. 2015. Curriculum Guide to Majors in the Mathematical Sciences. http://www.maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/CUPM/pdf/CUPMguide_print.pdf. Accessed 15 September 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Dannels, D. 2002. Communication across the curriculum and in the disciplines: Speaking in engineering. Communication Education. 51(3): 254–268.
   Google Scholar
• Green, K. H. 2002. Creating successful calculus writing assignments. PRIMUS. 12(2): 97–121.
   Google Scholar
• Greiffenhagen, C. 2014. The materiality of mathematics: Presenting mathematics at the blackboard. British Journal of Sociology. 65(3): 502–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grootenboer, P. and R. Zevenbergen. 2008. Identity as a lens to understand learning mathematics: Developing a model. Navigating Currents and Charting Directions. 1: 243–250.
   Google Scholar
• Kågesten, O. and J. Engelbrecht. 2007. Student group presentations: A learning instrument in undergraduate mathematics for engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education. 32(3): 303–314.
   Google Scholar
• Kasman, R. 2006. Critique that! Analytical writing assignments in advanced mathematics courses. PRIMUS. 16(1): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kirtland, J. and P. S. Hoh. 2002. Integrating mathematics and composition instruction. PRIMUS. 12(1): 11–26.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, Q. P., N. Y. Wong, and C. C. Lam. 2003. Student engagement in mathematics: Development of instrument and validation of construct. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 15(1): 4–21.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, S., M. L. Hassi, M. Kogan, A.-B. Hunter, and T. Weston. 2011. Evaluation of the IBL mathematics project: Student and instructor outcomes of inquiry-based learning in college mathematics. http://www.colorado.edu/eer/research/documents/IBLmathReportALL_050211.pdf. Accessed 30 September 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R. and R. Mayer. 2007. Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review. 19(3): 309–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, N. C. 2000. An oral-intensive abstract algebra course. PRIMUS. 10(3): 193–205.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston: VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Otten, S. J., B. Herbel-Eisenmann, M. D. Steele, M. Cirillo, and H. M. Bosman. 2011. Students actively listening: A foundation for productive discourse in mathematics classrooms. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. 2000. The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner (Eds), Handbook of Self-Regulation, pp. 451–502. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, K. R. 2005. Introduction. In Sawyer, R.K. (Ed), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, pp. 1–15. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seto, B. and D. E. Meel. 2006. Writing in mathematics: Making it work. PRIMUS. 16(3): 204–232.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, J. and P. W. Thompson. 2008. Toward a framework for the development of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 11: 499–511.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: CUP.
   Google Scholar