Publication Cover
PRIMUS
Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies
Volume 29, 2019 - Issue 6: Modeling Approach to Teaching Differential Equations (Part 1)
129
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Echoes of the Instructor’s Reasoning: Exemplars of Modeling for Homework

Pages 606-624 | Received 17 Nov 2017, Accepted 30 Apr 2018, Published online: 27 Mar 2019

REFERENCES

  • Atkinson, R. K., S. J. Derry, A. Renkl, and D. Wortham. 2000. Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research. 70(2): 181–214.
  • Baker, G. 2016. Differential Equations as Models in Science and Engineering. Singapore: B & Jo Enterprise Pte Ltd.
  • Bliss, K., K. Fowler, B. Galluzzo, S. Garfunkel, F. Giordano, L. Godbold, … and R. Zbiek. 2016. Guidelines for Assessment & Instruction in Mathematical Modeling Education. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
  • Blomhöj, M. and T. H. Jensen. 2003. Developing mathematical modelling competence: Conceptual clarification and educational planning. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications. 22(3): 123–140.
  • Braun, V, and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3: 77–101.
  • Camacho, M., J. Perdomo, and M. Santos-Trigo. 2008. Revisiting university students knowledge that involves basic differential equation questions. NAP: Journal of Research in Teaching of Mathematics. 3(3): 123–133.
  • Cyril, J. and V. Mudaly. 2007. Mathematical modelling of social issues in school mathematics in South Africa. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, and M. Niss (Eds), Modelling and Applicatins in Mathematics Education: The 14 ICMI Study, pp. 503–510. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Czocher, J. A. 2017. How can emphasizing mathematical modeling principles benefit students in a traditionally taught differential equations course? Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 45: 78–94.
  • Czocher, J. A. and G. Baker. 2011. Contextual learning in math education for engineers. In W. Aung, V. Ilic, J. Moscinski, and J. Uhomoibhi (Eds), World Innovations in Engineering Education and Research, pp. 309–326. Potomac, MD: iNEER.
  • Czocher, J. A., J. Tague, and G. Baker. 2013. Where does the calculus go? An investigation of how calculus ideas are used in later coursework. The International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 44(5): .
  • Czocher, J. A., J. Tague, G. Baker, and A. Roble. 2013. Successful collaboration among engineering, education, and mathematics. In American Society for Engineering Education, North Central Chapter.
  • Freudenthal, H. 1968. Why to teach mathematics so as to be useful. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 1(1–2): 3–8.
  • Hammons, J. L.and A. White. 2014. The effects of smart pen narrated solution sets on student study routines and their perceptions of the solution sets as a help resource. Doctoral Dissertation. Texas State University.
  • Lesh, R. and J. Zawojewski. 2007. Problem solving and modeling. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, pp. 763–804. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.
  • Orange, A., W. Heinecke, E. Berger, C. Krousgrill, B. Mikic, and D. Quinn. 2012. Technologies in undergraduate mechanical engineering courses. Advances in Engineering Education. 3: 1–29.
  • Raman, M. 2004. Epistemological messages conveyed by three high-school and college mathematics textbooks. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 23(4): 389–404.
  • Rasmussen, C. and O. N. Kwon. 2007. An inquiry-oriented approach to undergraduate mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 26: 189–194.
  • Redish, E. F. and K. A. Smith. 2008. Looking beyond content: Skill development for engineers. Journal of Engineering Education. 97(3): 295–307.
  • Renkl, A., R. K. Atkinson, and C. S. Groß. 2004. How fading worked solution steps works - A cognitive load perspective. Instructional Science. 32(1/2): 59–82.
  • Rowland, D. R. 2006. Student difficulties with units in differential equations in modelling contexts. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 37(5): 553–558.
  • Rowland, D. R. and Z. Jovanoski. 2004. Student interpretations of the terms in first-order ordinary differential equations in modelling contexts. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology. 35(4): 503–516.
  • Schukajlow, S., J. Kolter, and W. Blum. 2015. Scaffolding mathematical modelling with a solution plan. ZDM - Mathematics Education. 47(7): 1241–1254.
  • SIMIODE. 2017. Starter kit. https://www.simiode.org/starterkit. Accessed 27 October 2017.
  • Star, J. R. 2005. Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 36(5): 404–411.
  • Tague, J. and J. A. Czocher. 2016. A theoretical approach to ensuring instructional and curricular coherence in the flipped classroom model of a differential equations course. International Journal for Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. 2(2): 223–245.
  • Tague, J., J. A. Czocher, G. Baker, K. Harper, D. Grzybowski, and R. Freuler. 2013. Choosing and adapting technology in a mathematics course for engineers. In Proceedings of the 120th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Engineering Education. https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/20/papers/7445/view. Accessed 14 December 2018.
  • Tague, J., J. A. Czocher, G. Baker, K. Harper, D. Grzybowski, and R. Freuler. 2013. Engineering faculty perspectives on mathematical preparation of students. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Education.
  • Weinberg, A. and E. Wiesner. 2011. Understanding mathematics textbooks through reader-oriented theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 76(1): 49–63.
  • Zbiek, R. M. and A. Conner. 2006. Beyond motivation: Exploring mathematical modeling as a context for deepening students’ understandings of curricular mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 63(1): 89–112.
  • Zhu, X. and H. A. Simon. 1987. Learning mathematics from examples and by doing. Cognition and Instruction. 4(3): 137–166.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.