REFERENCES
- Cortright, R. N., H. L. Collins, D. W. Rodenbaugh, and S. E. DiCarlo. 2003. Student retention of course content is improved by collaborative-group testing. Advanced Physiological Education. 27(3): 102–108.
- Crouch, C. and E. Mazur. 2001. Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics. 69(9): 970–977.
- Deslauriers, L., E. Schelew, and C. Wieman. 2011. Improved learning in a large enrollment physics class. Science. 332 (6031): 862–864.
- Drouin, M. A. 2010. Group-based formative summative assessment relates to improved student performance and satisfaction. Teaching of Psychology. 37(2): 114–118.
- Gilley, B. H. and B. Clarkston. 2014. Collaborative testing: evidence of learning in a controlled in-class study of undergraduate students. Journal of College Science Teaching. 43(3): 83–91.
- Heller, P. and M. Hollabaugh. 1992. Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups. American Journal of Physics. 60: 637–644.
- Heller, P., R. Keith, and S. Anderson. 1992. Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving, American Journal of Physics. 60: 627–636.
- Leight, H., C. Saunders, R. Calkins, and M. Withers. 2012. Collaborative testing improves performance but not content retention in a large-enrollment introductory biology class. CBE — Life Science Education. 11: 392–401.
- Liljedahl, P. 2014. The affordances of using visually random groups in a mathematics classroom. In Y. Li, E. Silver, and S. Li (Eds) Transforming Mathematics Instruction: Multiple Approaches and Practices, pp. 127–146. New York, NY: Springer.
- Maxwell, J., L. McDonnell, and C. E. Wieman. 2015. An improved design for in-class review. Journal of College Science Teaching. 44: 48–52.
- Rao, S. P., H. L. Collins, and S. E. Dicarlo. 2002. Collaborative testing enhances student learning. Advances in Physiology Education. 26: 37–41.
- Rieger, G. W. and C. E. Heiner. 2014. Examinations that support collaborative learning: The students’ perspective. Journal of College Science Teaching. 43(4): 41–47.
- Sandahl, S. S. 2010. Collaborative testing as a learning strategy in nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives. 31(3): 142–147.
- Smith, M. K., W. B. Wood, W. K. Adams, C. Wieman, J. K. Knight, N. Guild, and T. T. Su. 2009. Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions, Science. 323(5910): 122–124.
- University of British Columbia. Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative, Handout Two-Stage Exams. http://www.cwsei.ubc.ca/resources/files/Two-stage_Exams.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2019.
- Woody, W. D., L. K. Woody, and S. Bromley. 2008. Anticipated group versus individual examinations: A classroom comparison. Teaching of Psychology. 35: 13–17.
- Zipp, J. F. 2007. Learning by exams: The impact of two-stage cooperative tests. Teaching Sociology. 35: 62–76.