REFERENCES
- Black, P. and D. Wiliam. 2009. Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (formerly: Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education). 21(1): 5–31.
- Blair, R., E. E. Kirkman, and J. W. Maxwell. 2013. Statistical Abstract of Undergraduate Programs in the Mathematical Sciences in the United States. Fall 2010 CBMS Survey. Washington, DC: American Mathematical Society.
- Boston, M. D. and M. S. Smith. 2009. Transforming secondary mathematics teaching: Increasing the cognitive demands of instructional tasks used in teachers’ classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 40(2):119–156.
- Bryk, A. S., L. M. Gomez, A. Grunow, and P. G. LeMahieu. 2015. Learning to Improve: How America’s Schools Can Get Better at Getting Better. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
- Cross, D. I. 2009. Alignment, cohesion, and change: Examining mathematics teachers’ belief structures and their influence on instructional practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 12(5): 325–346.
- Dweck, C. S. 2010. Even geniuses work hard. Educational Leadership. 68(1): 16–20.
- ENLACE Florida. 2009. Opening the gates to success in florida higher education. http://www.floridacollegeaccess.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/5.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2018.
- Ernest, P. 1989. The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. Mathematics Teaching: The State of the Art. 249: 249–254.
- Feldman, A. 2003. Validity and quality in self-study. Educational Researcher. 32(3): 26–28.
- Ganter, S. L. and W. Barker. (Eds). 2004. The Curriculum Foundations Project: Voices of The Partner Disciplines. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
- Gordon, S. P. 2008. What’s wrong with college algebra? PRIMUS. 18(6): 516–541.
- Hopf, F., R. Sears, A. Torres, and M. Maher. 2015. SMART lab: Opening doors to success in college algebra. MathAMATYC Educator. 6(2): 9–14.
- Kotter, J. P. 1995. Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review. 73(2): 59–67.
- Krathwohl, D. R. 2002. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice. 41(4): 212–218.
- LaBoskey, V. K. 2004. The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In International Handbook of Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices, pp. 817–869. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
- Lager, C. A. 2006. Types of mathematics-language reading interactions that unnecessarily hinder algebra learning and assessment. Reading Psychology. 27(2-3): 165–204.
- Lewis, C. 2015. What is improvement science? Do we need it in education? Educational Researcher. 44(1): 54–61.
- Morgan, M. L. 2011. Beliefs of college algebra instructors. Ph.D. thesis. Athens, GA: University of Georgia.
- Naismith, L. and C. J. Sangwin. 2004. Computer algebra based assessment of mathematics online. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual CAA Conference, pp. 235–242. Birmingham, UK: The University of Loughborough.
- Small, D. 2006. College algebra: A course in crisis. MAA NOTES. 69: 83–89.
- Stipek, D. J., K. B. Givvin, J. M. Salmon, and V. L. MacGyvers. 2001. Teachers’ beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education. 17(2): 213–226.
- Twigg, C. A. 2011. The math emporium: A silver bullet for higher education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning. 43(3): 25–34.