Improving Student Preparation and Pass Rates in Flipped Multivariable Calculus with Low-Stakes, Daily Quizzes

REFERENCES

• Adams, C. and A. Dove. 2016. Flipping calculus: The potential influence, and the lessons learned. Electronic Journal of Mathematics & Technology. 10(3): 154–164.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, P. K. and P. M. Bain. 2019. Powerful Teaching: Unleash the Science of Learning. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, P. K., L. D. Nunes, and J. R. Blunt. 2021. Retrieval practice consistently benefits student learning: A systematic review of applied research in schools and classrooms. Educational Psychology Review. 33(4): 1409–1453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, I., S. Ritter, and M. Vasko. 2014. Inverted classroom by topic - A study in mathematics for electrical engineering students. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP). 4(3): 11.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, A. C. and H. L. Roediger, 3rd. 2008. Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing. Memory & Cognition. 36(3): 604–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caerols-Palmaa, H. and K. Vogt-Geisse. 2019. Creating and experiencing flipped learning in multivariable calculus for engineering. arXiv: Mathematics - History Overview. 1907.085754.
   Google Scholar
• Cronhjort, M., L. Filipsson, and M. Weurlander. 2018. Improved engagement and learning in flipped-classroom calculus. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications. 37(3): 113–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, J. C. 2010. Examination of the U.S. Air Force’s Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Workforce Needs in the Future and Its Strategy to Meet Those Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Green, G. Changing education, one class, one student at a time. Clintondale High School. http://www.flippedhighschool.com Accessed 17 December 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Groen, L., M. Coupland, T. Langtry, J. Memar, B. Moore, and J. Stanley. 2015. The mathematics problem and mastery learning for first-year, undergraduate STEM students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. , Vol. 11, No 1.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, P. J., J. Kim, and R. Rubin. 2014. How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning at scale conference, pp. 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. and H. Timperley. 2007. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research. 77(1): 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, E., B. Beaudrie, D. C. Ernst, and R. St. Laurent. 2015. Inverted pedagogy in second semester calculus. PRIMUS. 25(9-10): 892–906.
   Google Scholar
• Kooistra, R. 2018. What do flipped mathematics classes accomplish? A literature review. Presented at the Alberta Mathematics Dialogue, University of Alberta [Online]. http://cs.kingsu.ca/~remkes/talks/flippedlitreview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T.-Y. 2020. Predictors of flipped classroom learning outcomes for a course on social work research. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching. 31(4): 17–40.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, C. K., K. F. Hew, and G. Chen. 2017. Toward a set of design principles for mathematics flipped classrooms: A synthesis of research in mathematics education. Educational Research Review. 22: 50–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maciejewski, W. 2016. Flipping the calculus classroom: An evaluative study. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications. 35: 187–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBride, C. 2015. Flipping advice for beginners: What I learned flipping undergraduate mathematics and statistics classes. PRIMUS. 25(8): 694–712.
   Google Scholar
• McGivney-Burelle, J. and F. Xue. 2013. Flipping calculus. PRIMUS. 23(5): 477–486.
   Google Scholar
• Merill, M. 2002. First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development. 50(3): 43–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keefe, D., D. Meier, J. Valentine-Rodriguez, L. Belcher, and W. Gonzalez-Espada. 2022. A mixed methods analysis of STEM major attrition at the U.S. Air Force Academy. Journal of Military Learning. 6(1): 15–38.
   Google Scholar
• Petrillo, J. 2016. On flipping first-semester calculus: A case study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 47(4): 573–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schacter, D. and K. Szpunar. 2015. Enhancing attention and memory during video-recorded lectures. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. 1(1): 60–71.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, L. B., J. McGivney-Burelle, and F. Xue. 2015. To flip or not to flip? An exploratory study comparing student performance in calculus I. PRIMUS. 25(9-10): 876–885.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. E., L. E. Green, and D. L. Etheridge. 2016. A comparison between flipped and lecture-based instruction in the calculus classroom. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 8(2): 252–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanhope, S. 2021. Supporting spatial conceptualization in multivariable calculus using 3D printed surfaces, the visualization applet CalcPlot3D, and experiential learning activities. Presented at the Joint Mathematics Meetings, virtual.
   Google Scholar
• Yong, D., R. Levy, and N. Lape. 2015. Why no difference? A controlled flipped classroom study for an introductory differential equations course. PRIMUS. 25(9-10): 907–921.
   Google Scholar