Teaching and Learning of Vertex Coloring Using an Inquiry-Based Approach

References

• Bakaein, S., M. Tavakoli, A. R. Ashrafi, and O. Ori. 2018. Coloring of fullerenes. Fullerenes, Nanotubes and Carbon Nanostructures. 26(11): 705–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonotto, C. and L. Dal Santo. 2015. On the relationship between problem-posing, problem solving, and creativity in the primary school. In F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, and J. Cai (Eds), Mathematical Problem Posing, pp. 103–123. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bozorgmehr, A., M. Ghadirivasfi, M. Tavakoli, H. Rahmani, F. Heydari, and E. S. Ananloo. 2018. Integrated analysis of the genetic basis of suicidal behavior: what has been shown by structural genetic studies so far. Psychiatric Genetics. 28(2): 31–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressoud, D., V. Mesa, and C. Rasmussen. 2015. Insights and Recommendations from the MAA National Study of College Calculus. Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, J. and S. Hwang. 2020. Learning to teach through mathematical problem posing: theoretical considerations, methodology, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research. 102: 101391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capaldi, M. 2015. Including inquiry-based learning in a flipped class. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies. 25(8): 736–744.
   Google Scholar
• Chartrand, G. and P. Zhang. 2009. Chromatic Graph Theory. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Crisman, K.-D. 2012. Using notebooks to supplement bridge courses. PRIMUS. 22(1): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Czarneski, D. 2013. A first-year course that teaches research skills. PRIMUS. 23(5): 487–495.
   Google Scholar
• Despeaux, S. E. 2015. Oulipo: applying mathematical constraints to literature and the arts in a mathematics for the liberal arts classroom. PRIMUS. 25(3): 238–247.
   Google Scholar
• English, L. D. 1998. Children’s problem posing within formal and informal contexts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 29(1): 83–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/749719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, D. C., A. Hodge, and S. Yoshinobu. 2017. What is inquiry-based learning? Notices of the AMS. 64(6): 570–574.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth. 2014. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111(23): 8410–8415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, S., N. Apkarian, C. Rasmussen, and B. Katz. 2020. Critical stance within a community of inquiry in an advanced mathematics course for pre-service teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 24: 231–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutman, I. 2019. Mathematical chemistry works of Dragoš Cvetković. Mathematics Interdisciplinary Research. 4: 129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, B. 2014. Transforming mathematics instruction. advances in mathematics education. In Y. Li, E. Silver, and S. Li (Eds), Unifying Complexity in Mathematics Teaching-Learning Development: A Theory-Practice Dialectic (pp. 439–457). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04993-9_24.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, B. 2020. Inquiry-based practice in university mathematics teaching development. In D. Potari, and O. Chapman (Eds.), International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education, pp. 275–302. Leiden: Brill Sense, Volume 1.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E., R. Keller, V. Peterson, and T. Fukawa-Connelly. 2019. Individual and situational factors related to undergraduate mathematics instruction. International Journal of STEM Education. 6: 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0175-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasman, R. 2014. Balancing structure and creativity in culminating projects for liberal arts mathematics. PRIMUS. 24(6): 480–490.
   Google Scholar
• Knuth, E., O. Zaslavsky, and A. Ellis. 2019. The role and use of examples in learning to prove. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 53: 256–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, S. L., M.-L. Hassi, M. Kogan, and T. J. Weston. 2014. Benefits for women and men of inquiry-based learning in college mathematics: A multi-institution study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 45(4): 406–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, S. L. and C. Rasmussen. 2019. I on the prize: inquiry approaches in undergraduate mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. 5(1): 129–146.
   Google Scholar
• Love, B., A. Hodge, C. Corritore, and D. C. Ernst. 2015. Inquiry-based learning and the flipped classroom model. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies. 25(8): 745–762.
   Google Scholar
• Nedaei, M., F. Radmehr, and M. Drake. 2019. Exploring engineering undergraduate students’ attitudes towards mathematical problem posing. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 145(4), https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000418.
   Google Scholar
• Nedaei, M., F. Radmehr, and M. Drake. 2022. Exploring undergraduate engineering students’ mathematical problem posing: The case of the integral-area relationship in integral calculus. Mathematical Thinking and Learning. 24(2): 149–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1858516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radmehr, F. and M. Drake. 2019. Students’ mathematical performance, metacognitive experiences and metacognitive skills in relation to integral-area relationships. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA. 38(2): 85–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlett, P., E. Smith, A. S. Corner, D. O’Sullivan, and J. Waldock. 2019. The potential of recreational mathematics to support the development of mathematical learning. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 50(7): 972–986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, D. J. 2018. Harris graphs – a graph theory activity for students and their instructors. The College Mathematics Journal. 49(5): 323–326.
   Google Scholar
• The Mathematical Association of America. 2018. MAA Instructional Practices Guide. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Theobald, E. J., M. J. Hill, E. Tran, S. Agrawal, E. N. Arroyo, S. Behling, … and J. A. Grummer. 2020. Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117(12): 6476–6483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar