A Framework for Facilitator Actions in Professional Development That Support Mathematicians’ Instructional Change

REFERENCES

• Andrews-Larson, C., E. Johnson, V. Peterson, and R. Keller. 2021. Doing math with mathematicians to support pedagogical reasoning about inquiry-oriented instruction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 24: 127–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apkarian, N. and D. Reinholz. 2019. Understanding and enacting organizational change: An approach in four frames. In A. Weinberg, D. Moore-Russo, H. Soto, and M. Wawro (Eds), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, pp. 10–17. Oklahoma City, OK: Oklahoma State University and the University of Oklahoma.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. and C. N. Poth. 2017. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, D., Ethnography & Evaluation Research, and the Academy of Inquiry Based Learning. 2021, June. AIBL Handbook for Online Professional Development: Lessons Learned from PRODUCT Workshops. Boulder, CO, and San Luis Obispo, CA: University of Colorado Boulder, Ethnography & Evaluation Research; and Academy of Inquiry Based Learning. https://tinyurl.com/AIBLHandbook
   Google Scholar
• Demir, K., C. M. Czerniak, and L. C. Hart. 2013. Implementing Japanese lesson study in a higher education context. Journal of College Science Teaching. 42(4): 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, N. and K. A. Keene. 2021. Participating in an online working group and reforming instruction: The case of Dr. DM. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. 7(1): 107–139. doi:10.1007/s40753-020-00126-5.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, C. N., M. Kogan, and S. L. Laursen. 2016. Facilitating instructor adoption of inquiry-based learning in college mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. 2(1): 59–82.
   Google Scholar
• Hundey, B. J., L. M. Anstey, H. Cruickshank, and G. P. L. Watson. 2020. Mentoring faculty online: A literature review and recommendations for web-based programs. International Journal for Academic Development. 25(30): 232–246. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2020.1731815.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, M. A. and E. Johnson. 2022. The inquirer, the sense maker, and the builder: Participant roles in an online working group designed to support inquiry-oriented instruction. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 67: 100984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuster, G., E. Johnson, R. Rupnow, and A. G. Wilhelm. 2019. The inquiry-oriented instructional measure. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. 5(2): 183–204.
   Google Scholar
• Lantz-Andersson, A., M. Lundin, and N. Selwyn. 2018. Twenty years of online teacher communities: A systematic review of formally-organized and informally-developed professional learning groups. Teaching and Teacher Education. 75: 302–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, S. 2016. Organizational features that influence departments’ uptake of student-centered instruction: Case studies from inquiry-based learning in college mathematics. In T. Fukawa-Connelly, N. Infante, M. Wawro, and S. Brown (Eds), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, pp. 1022–1030. Pittsburgh, PA: Western Virginia University.
   Google Scholar
• Mathematical Association of America [MAA]. 2015. A Common Vision for Undergraduate Mathematical Sciences Programs in 2025. K. Saxe and L. Braddy (Eds). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. S., S. E. Shadle, and J. K. Hettinger. 2013. A journey toward mastery teaching: STEM faculty engagement in a year-long faculty learning community. Learning Communities Journal. 5: 97–122.
   Google Scholar
• Price, E., A. C. Lau, F. Goldberg, C. Turpen, P. S. Smith, M. Dancy, and S. Robinson. 2021. Analyzing a faculty online learning community as a mechanism for supporting faculty implementation of a guided-inquiry curriculum. International Journal of STEM Education. 8(17): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, C. and O. N. Kwon. 2007. An inquiry-oriented approach to undergraduate mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 26(3): 189–194.
   Google Scholar
• Reinholz, D. L., and N. Apkarian. 2018. Four frames for systemic change in STEM departments. International Journal of STEM Education. 5(3): 1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonnert, G., P. M. Sadler, S. M. Sadler, and D. M. Bressoud. 2015. The impact of instructor pedagogy on college calculus students’ attitude toward mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 46(3): 370–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speer, N. M. and J. F. Wagner. 2009. Knowledge needed by a teacher to provide analytic scaffolding during undergraduate mathematics classroom discussions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 40(5): 530–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Es, E. A., J. Tunney, L. T. Goldsmith, and N. Seago. 2014. A framework for the facilitation of teachers’ analysis of video. Journal of Teacher Education. 65(4): 340–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshinobu, S., M. G. Jones, C. N. Hayward, C. Schumacher, and S. L. Laursen. 2022. A broad doorway to the big tent: A four-strand model for discipline-based faculty development on inquiry-based learning. PRIMUS. 33(4): 329–354. doi:10.1080/10511970.2022.2072427.
   Google Scholar