Enhancing Perceived Learning within the Simulated Marketing Environment

References

• Alpert, Frank (1995), “Using Executive Briefings in Marketing Simulations,” Marketing Education Review, Vol. 5, Number 1, 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, Albert (1977), Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Barling, J. and R. Beattie (1983), “Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Sales Performance,” Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 5, 41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, Bernard and James Vaughn (1966), Training and Industry: The Management of Learning, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, p. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S., M.D. Englehart, E.J. Furst, W.H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl (1956), Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, New York: David McKay Co.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, Alvin C. and James W. Gentry (1992), “Computer Simulation Games in Marketing: Past, Present, and Future,” Marketing Education Review, Vol. 2, 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Cadotte, Ernest R. (1994), The Market Place: Executive Edition, Knoxville, TN: E.R. Cadotte.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Andrew and Laura L. Nash (1992), A Sense of Mission, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Celsi, Richard L. and Jerry C. Olson (1988), “The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15, September, 210–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, Randall (1994), Brandmaps: The Competitive Marketing Strategy Game, Third Edition, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, xiii–xv.
   Google Scholar
• Day, George S. (1994), “Continuous Learning About Markets,” California Management Review, 36, (4), 9–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria, A.J. (1987), “A Survey of the Use of Business Games in Academia and Business,” Simulation & Games, Vol. 18, No. 2, 207–224.
   Google Scholar
• Faria, A.J. and John R. Dickinson (1994), “Simulation Gaming for Sales Management Training,” Journal of Management Development, 13 (1), 47–59.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, James W. (1980), “Group Size and Attitudes Toward the Simulation Experience,” Simulation & Games, Vol. 11, No. 4, 451–460.
   Google Scholar
• Glazer, Rashi, Joel H. Steckel, and Russell S. Winer (1987), “Group Process and Decision Performance in a Simulated Marketing Environment,” Journal of Business Research, 15, 545–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, Joseph F., Jr., Rolph E. Anderson, Ronald L. Tatham, and William C. Black (1992), Multivariate Data Analysis, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgard, Ernest, and Gordon H. Bower (1966), Theories of Learning, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Keys, Bernard (1987), “Total Enterprise Business Games,” Simulation & Games, Vol. 18, No. 2, 225–241.
   Google Scholar
• Keys, Bernard, Alfred G. Edge, and Robert A. Wells (1992), The Multinational Management Game, Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Keys, Bernard, and Joseph Wolfe (1990), “The Roles of Management Games and Simulations in Education and Research,” Journal of Management, Vol. 16, No. 2, 307–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keys, Bernard, Robert A. Wells, and Alfred G. Edge (1994), “The Multinational Management Game: A Simuworld,” Journal of Management Development, Vol. 13, No. 8, 26–37.
   Google Scholar
• Kraiger, Kurt, Kevin J. Ford, and Eduardo Salas (1993), “Application of Cognitive, Skill-based, and Affective Theories of Learning Outcomes, to New Methods of Training Evaluation,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 78 (2), 311–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larreche, Jean-Claude (1987), “On Simulations in Business Education and Research,” Journal of Business Research, 15, 559–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laughlin, Jay L. and Robert E. Hite (1993), “Game and Simulation Effectiveness in Marketing Education: An Experimental Investigation,” Journal of Marketing Education, Fall, 39–46.
   Google Scholar
• Laurent, Gilles, and Jean-No”l Kapferer (1985), “Measuring Consumer Involvement Profiles,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 22, (February), 41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, Edward F. and J. Michael Munson (1986), “The Zaichkowsky Personal Involvement Inventory: Modification and Extension,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 14, Paul Anderson and Melanie Wallendorf (eds.), Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 36–40.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrez, A., A. Reichel, and R. Olami (1988), “The Business Game Versus Reality,” Simulation & Games, Vol. 18, No. 4, 488–500.
   Google Scholar
• Miesing, Paul, and John F. Preble (1985), “Group Processes and Performance in a Complex Business Simulation,” Small Group Behavior, 16, 325–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, Jum C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, Second Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Peter, J. Paul and Jerry C. Olson (1993), Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategy, Third Edition, Homewood, IL: Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Ruben, D. and C. Lederman (1982), “Instructional Simulation Gaming: Validity, Reliability and Utility,” Simulation and Games, 13, 233–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senge, Peter M. (1990), The Fifth Discipline, New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Slack, Kim (1993), “Training for the Real Thing,” Training and Development, May, 79–89.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, Michael R. (1992), Consumer Behavior, Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• The American Heritage Dictionary (1985), Second College Edition, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, p. 720.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, Joseph (1978), “The Effects of Game Complexity on the Acquisition of Business Policy Knowledge,” Decision Sciences, Vol. 9, 143–155.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, Joseph (1985), “The Teaching Effectiveness of Games in Collegiate Business Courses,” Simulation and Games, Vol. 16, No. 3, September, 251–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, Joseph and Thomas M. Box (1988), “Team Cohesion Effects on Business Game Performance,” Simulation and Games, 19 (1) March, 82–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, Joseph and Thomas I. Chacko (1983), “Team-Size Effects on Business Game Performance and Decision-Making Behaviors,” Decision Sciences, 14 (January), 121–133.
   Google Scholar
• Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne (1985), “Measuring the Involvement Construct,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 12, December, 341–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinkhan, George M., Erich A. Joachimsthaler, and Thomas C. Kinnear (1987), “Individual Differences and Marketing Decision Support System Usage and Satisfaction,” Journal of Marketing Research, 24, (May), 208–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar