Peer Evaluated Debates: Developing Oral Communication Skills through Marketing Case Studies

References

• Berdine, Rudy (1987), “Increasing Student Involvement in the Learning Process through Debate on Controversial Topics,” Marketing Education, 9 (Fall), 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bovée, Courtland L. and John V. Thill, “50 Ways to Get Students Involved in Marketing,” brochure distributed along with their textbook Marketing (1992), McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, Stephen D. (1991), “When Visuals Aid in the Presentation,” Manager, 16 (2), 22–23.
   Google Scholar
• Brockway, Gary R., Sam McNeely and Phillip B. Niffenegger (1992), “A Point-Counterpoint Classroom Exercise,” Education Review, 2 (Summer), 34–36.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R.D. (1993), “New AACSB Standards will Bring Major Changes to Marketing Departments,” Educator, (Fall), 1, 11.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, John (1990), “The Best B Schools,” Week, 29 October, 52–66.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, John A. and David W. Schodt (1995), “Beyond the Lecture: Case Teaching and the Learning of Economic Theory,” Economic Education, 26 (1), 17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, Steven B. and Karen A. Glynn (1992), “Writing in the Marketing Curriculum,” Marketing Education, 14 (Summer), 46–52.
   Google Scholar
• Day, G.S. (1986), “Tough Questions for Developing Strategies,” Business Strategy, 7 (Winter), 60–68.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Randall S. and Katharine H. Hansen (1995), “Incorporating Writing across the Curriculum into an Introductory Marketing Course,” Marketing Education, 17 (Spring), 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, Metta L. (1984), “Types of Classroom Tests: Essay Tests and Oral Exams,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 48, 290–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, Edwin P. (1965), “Validity of Peer Nominations in Predicting a Distant Performance Criterion,” Applied Psychology, 49, 434–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacko, C.M. (1978), “Small-Group Triad: An Instructional Mode for Teaching of Writing,” Composition and Communication, 29 (3), 290–92.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Virginia (1989), “Picture-Perfect Presentations,” Development Journal, 43 (5), 45–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaess, W.A., Sam L. Witryol and Rebecca E. Nolan (1961), “Reliability, Sex Differences, and Validity in the Leaderless Group Discussion Technique,” Applied Psychology, 45, 345–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, Jeffrey S. and Edward E. Lawler III (1978), “Methods of Peer Assessment,” Bullettin, 85, 555–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, Alan T. and Kenneth B. Melvin (1994), “The Prof/Peer Method: A Technique to Rate Class Participation,” Accounting Education, 9 (1), 109–17.
   Google Scholar
• Love, K.B. (1981), “Comparison of Peer Assessment Methods: Reliability, Validity, Friendship Bias, and User Reaction,” Applied Psychology, 66, 451–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, Paul R. (1989), “Assessing Classroom Participation,” Teaching, 37, 36–38.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Charles L. (1990), “Enhancing the Effectiveness of Salient Oral Presentations,” Education Review, 1 (November): 56–60.
   Google Scholar
• May, Gordon S. and C.B. May (1989), “Communication Instruction: What is being Done to Develop the Communication Skills of Accounting Students?” Accounting Education, 7, 233–44.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, J. (1982), “Responding to Student Writing,” in Directions for Teaching and Learning: Teaching Writing in All Disciplines, C.W. Griffin, ed., San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 59–65.
   Google Scholar
• Melvin, Kenneth B. (1988), “Rating Class Participation: The Prof/Peer Method,” Psychology, 15 (October), 137–39.
   Google Scholar
• Mensching, James R., and Edmund Scribner (1994), “A Methodology for Using Oral Testing in Accounting Courses,” Educators’ Journal, 6 (2), 107–17.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. Ballard (1990), “Leadership,” Horizons, (November-December), 3–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadziejka, David E. (1987), “Can They Read When You Speak? Poor Visual Aids Can Obstruct Communication,” American Society for Information Science, 13 (4), 22–23.
   Google Scholar
• November, Peter (1993), “Right- and Left-Brain Marketing Education,” Marketing Education, 15 (Summer), 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ronchetto, John R. and Tom A. Buckles (1994), “Developing Critical Thinking and Interpersonal Skills in a Services Marketing Course Employing Total Quality Management Concepts and Techniques,” Marketing Education, 16 (Fall), 20–31.
   Google Scholar
• Rothfeld, H. (1994), “Research Sense? Or Nonsense?” Educator, 13 (3), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffer, C.M. (1995), “The Use of Team Learning Approach in Selected Marketing Courses,” Education Review, 5 (1), 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, Kathleen, Mark Higgins and Dana Lowe (1995), “A Profile of Communication Apprehension in Accounting Majors: Implications for Teaching and Curriculum Revision,” Accounting Education, 13 (2), 159–76.
   Google Scholar
• Teaching Professor (1989), Madison, WI: Magna Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Velenchik, Ann D. (1995), “The Case Method as a Strategy for Teaching Policy Analysis to Undergraduates,” Economic Education, 26 (1), 29–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, David L., John D. Beard and J. Rymer (1991), “Team Projects: Achieving Their Full Potential,” Marketing Education, 13 (Summer), 45–53.
   Google Scholar
• Winer, L. (1990), “Adding Skill Development to Graduate Marketing: A Case History,” in Marketing Science, Vol. 13, B.J. Dunlap, ed., Cullowhee, NC: Academy of Marketing Science, 284–88.
   Google Scholar
• Wolvin, A. (1984), “Meeting the Communication Needs of the Adult Listener,” Education, 33, 267–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wotruba, Thomas R. (1992), “A Compensation Analogy for Grading Students in Sales Management Courses,” Marketing Education, 14 (Summer), 20–5.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, June C. and Douglas W. Laube (1983), “Improvement of Reliability of an Oral Examination by a Structured Evaluation Instrument,” Medical Education, (Fall), 20–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar