On Different Teaching Delivery Methods: What Happens to Instructor Course Evaluations?

References

• Anderson, L., S. Banks, and P. Leary (2002), “The Effect of Interactive Television on Student Satisfaction,” Journal of Education for Business, January/February, 164–168.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L., S. Banks, and P. Leary and L. Shao (2002), “Grading the Teachers,” Biz Ed, November/December, 36–39.
   Google Scholar
• Barket, R., and C. Holley (1996), “Interactive Distance Learning: Perspective and Thought,” Business Communication Quarterly, 59, 88–98.
   Google Scholar
• Bisoux, T. (2002), “The E-Learning Equation,” Biz Ed, July/August, 40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., A. Gupta, and L. Hoshower (2004), “Marketing Students’ Perceptions of Teaching Evaluations: An Application of Expectancy Theory,” Marketing Education Review, 14, 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Chernish, W., A. DeFranco, J. Lindner, and K. Dooley (2005), “Does it Matter? Analyzing the Results of Three Different Delivery Methods,” Quarterly Reviwe of Distance Education, 6, 87–95.
   Google Scholar
• Close, A., A. Dixit, and N. Malhotra (2005), “Chalkboards to Cybercourses: The Internet and Marketing Education,” Marketing Education Review, 15, 81–94.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, L. (2000), “Online Courses,” THE Journal, 27, 86–92.
   Google Scholar
• Donoho, R. (1998), “The New MBA,” Training, 35, D4–D9.
   Google Scholar
• Farrior, E., and M. Gallagher (2000), “An Evaluation of Distance Education,” Topics in Clinical Nutrition, 15, 10–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrell, O and L. Ferrell (2002), “Assessing Instructional Technology in the Classroom,” Marketing Education Review, 12, 19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, K., C. Martinez, R. Santillan, and J. Brazell (1998), “International Marketing Internet in the Classroom: A Global Approach to the Group Case Method,” Marketing Education Review, 8, 75–82.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, R., A. Boyd, and A. Herrmann (1997), “What Form Should Student Evaluation of Distance Teaching Take?” in Learning Through Teaching-Proceedings, 6th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, Pospisil and Willcoxson, eds., Murdoch University, Perth.
   Google Scholar
• Gerencher, K. (1998), “MBA Programs go Online,” Infoworld, 20, 71–72.
   Google Scholar
• Giannoni, D., and D. Tesone (2003), “What Academic Administrators Should Know to Attract Senior Level Faculty Members to Online Learning Environments,” Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck, C., G. Zinkhan, and W. French (2005), “Distance Learning Trends and Benchmarks: Lessons Fron an Online MBA Program,” Marketing Education Review, 15, 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Im, Y., and O. Lee (2003), “Pedagogical Implications of Online Discussion for Preservice Teacher Learning,” Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36, 55–170.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J., and B. DeSpain (2001), “Policies and Practices in the Utilization of Interactive Televsion and Web-Based Delivery Models in Public Universities,” Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K., and C. Kelley (2003), “Teaching Marketing Via the Internet: Lessons Learned and Challenges to be Met,” Marketing Education Review, 13, 80–89.
   Google Scholar
• Jurczyk, J., S. Benson, and J. Savery (2004), “Measuring Student Perceptions in Web-Based Courses: A Standards-Based Approach,” Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 7.
   Google Scholar
• Kaynama, S., and G. Keesling (2000), “Development of a Web-Based Internet Marketing Course,” Journal of Marketing Education, 22, 84–89.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, M. (2003), “Planning for Distance Learning: Issues and Strategies,” Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 4, 254–263.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, N. (2002), “Integrating Technology in Marketing Education: Perspective for the New Millennium,” Marketing Education Review, 12, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• McBane, D. (2003), “Getting the Horse to Drink: Teaching Technology to Marketing Students,” Marketing Education Review, 13, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Mintu-Wimsatt, A. (2001), “Traditional vs. Technology-Mediated Learning: A Comparison of Students’ Course Evaluations,” Marketing Education Review, 11, 65–75.
   Google Scholar
• O'Malley, J. (1999), “Students Perceptions of Distance Learning, Online Learning and the Traditional Classroom,” Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Omatseye, J. (1999), “Teaching Through Tele-Conferencing: Some Curriculum Challenges,” College Student Journal, 33, 346–353.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Rodriguez, M., R. Telg, and T. Irani (2005), “College Students’ Perceptions of Quality in Distance Education: The Importance of Communication,” Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6, 97–105.
   Google Scholar
• Perreault, H., L. Waldman, M. Alexander, and J. Zhao (2002), “Overcoming Barriers to Successful Delivery of Distance Learning Courses,” Journal of Education for Business, July/August, 313–318.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, T. (1992), “Television's Indelible Impact on Distance Education: What We Should Have Learned from Comparative Research,” Research in Distance Education, 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Selim, H. (2005), “Videoconferencing-Mediated Instruction: Success Model,” International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 3, 62–80.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe, T., and A. Hawkins (1998), “Technology and the Information Age: A Cautionary Tale for Higher Education,” Quest, 50, 19–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, B., P. Haghirian, and B. Schlegelmilch (2003), “Enriching Global Marketing Education With Virtual Classroom: An Effectiveness Study,” Marketing Education Review, 13, 27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (1998), “Education Poised to go the Distance,” National Underwriter Life & Health-Financial Services Edition, November 9, 19.
   Google Scholar
• Spooner, F., L. Jordan, B. Algozzine, and M. Spooner (1999), “Student Ratings of Instruction in Distance Learning and On-Campus Classes,” Journal of Educational Research, 92, 132–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, B., C. Waight, M. Norwood, and S. Ezell (2004), “Formative and Summative Evaluation of Online Courses,” Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 5, 101–109.
   Google Scholar
• Summers, J., A. Waigandt, and T. Whittaker (2005), “A Comparison of Student Achievement in an Online Versus a Traditional Face-to-Face Statistics Class,” Innovative Higher Education, 29, 233–250.
   Google Scholar
• Suter, T., and S. Kopp (1998), “Using the Internet and World Wide Web in Marketing Education: An Examination of the Copyright Act of 1976,” Marketing Education Review, 8, 29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Tham, C. (2005), “Design and Evaluating E-Learning in Higher Education: A Review and Recommendations,” Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11, 15–25.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education (2002), “Survey on Distance Education at Higher Education Institutions, 2000-2001,” National Center for Education Statistics, Post Secondary Quick Information System.
   Google Scholar
• Van Schaik, P., P. Barker, and S. Beckstrand (2003), “A Comparison of On-Campus and Online Course delivery Methods in Southern Nevada,” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40, 5–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, L., and H. Holloman (2005), “On-Line Instruction: Are the Outcomes the Same?” Journal of Instructional Technology, 32, 148–151.
   Google Scholar