Flipped Classrooms: An Agenda for Innovative Marketing Education in the Digital Era

REFERENCES

• Belk, R. W., & Kozinets, R. V. (2005). Videography in marketing and consumer research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(2), 128–141.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsell, E., & Horejsi, M. (2013). A flipped classroom in action. The Science Teacher, 80(2), 8.
   Google Scholar
• Bulu, S. T. (2012). Place presence, social presence, co-presence, and satisfaction in virtual worlds. Computers & Education, 58, 154–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1999). Development and adaptations of the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. New Direction for Teaching and Learning, 80, 75–81.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, H. (2005). The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 11, 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Crews, T., & Butterfield, J. (2014). Data for flipped classroom design: Using student feedback to identify the best components from online and face-to-face classes. Higher Education Studies, 4(3), 38–47.
   Google Scholar
• Demetry, C. (2010). An innovation merging “classroom flip” and team-based learning. Fortieth ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 27th–30th, Washington DC. doi.: 10.1109/FIE.2010.5673617
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, K. A. (1984). Class size and college students’ evaluations of teachers and courses: A closer look. Research in Higher Education, 21(1), 45–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, J. D., Ford, L. W., & D’Amelio, A. (2008). Resistance to change: The rest of the story. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 362–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95–106.
   Google Scholar
• Gerstein, J. (2012). Flipped classroom: The full picture for higher education. User Generated Education, 15.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62–66.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, C. B., & Repman, J. (2011, September). Moving outside the LMS: Matching Web 2.0 tools to instructional purpose. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELIB1103.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, H. (2012). Introduction to flipping the college classroom. In T. Amield & B. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2012 (pp. 2434–2438). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Keh, H. T., & Pang, J. (2010). Customer reactions to service separation. Journal of Marketing, 74(March), 55–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualising, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(January), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Kwon, Y., & Cho, D. (2011). Investigating factors that influence social presence and learning outcomes in distance higher education. Computers & Education, 57, 1512–1520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, L. M. (2008). Toolbox or trap? Course management systems and pedagogy. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 31(2), 4–6. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm0820.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lovelock, C., & Gummeson, E. (2004). Whither services marketing? In search of a new paradigm and fresh perspectives. Journal of Service Research, 7(1), 20–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeachie, W. J. (1980). Class size, large classes, and multiple sections. American Association of University Professors, 66(1), 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Mizerski, R. (1995). The relationship between cartoon trade character recognition and attitude toward product category in young children. Journal of Marketing, 59(October), 58–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreg, S. (2003). Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 680–693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, J., Maor, D., & Herrington, J. (2013). Authentic online learning: Aligning learner needs, pedagogy and technology. Issues in Educational Research, 23(2), 227–241.
   Google Scholar
• Reinartz, W. J., & Kumar, V. (2003). The impact of customer relationship characteristics on profitable lifetime duration. Journal of Marketing, 67(January), 77–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell-Bennett, R., Rundle-Thiele, S. R., & Kuhn, K. A. (2010). Engaging marketing students: Student operated business in a simulated world. Journal of Marketing Education, 32(3), 253–263.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, R. T., Lemon, K. N., & Zeithaml, V. A. (2004). Return on marketing: Using customer equity to focus marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing, 68(January), 109–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Säljö, R. (1979). Learning about learning. Higher Education, 8, 443–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, J. (2000). Understanding human competence at work: An interpretative approach. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 9–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowball, J. D. (2014). Using interactive content and online activities to accommodate diversity in a large first year class. Higher Education ( January). doi.: 10.1007/s10734-013-9708-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So, H.-J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51, 318–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steed, A. (2012). The flipped classroom. Teaching Business & Economics, 16(3), 9–11.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. (1997). Colleges as communities: Exploring the educational character of student persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 68, 599–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. (2006 /2007). Research and practice of student retention: What next? Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 8, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Vargo, S., & Lusch, R. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(January), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language (E. H. Vakar, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (V. John-Steiner, M. Cole, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wachtel, H. K. (1998). Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 191–212.
   Google Scholar
• Waddell, D., & Sohal, A. S. (1998). Resistance: A constructive tool for change management. Management Decision, 36(8), 543–548.
   Google Scholar
• Weerawardena, J. (2003). Exploring the role of market learning capability in competitive strategy. European Journal of Marketing, 37(3/4), 407–429.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1984). The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 23, 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Zappe, S., Leicht, R., Messner, J., Litzinger, T., & Lee, H. W. (2009). Flipping the classroom to explore active learning in a large undergraduate course. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon.
   Google Scholar