The Impact of Collaboration, Empowerment, and Choice: An Empirical Examination of the Collaborative Course Development Method

References

• Ackerman, D. S., & Gross, B. L. (2006). How many choices are good? Measurement of the effects of course choice on perceptions of a marketing option. Journal of Marketing Education, 28(1), 69–80. doi:10.1177/0273475305284642
   Google Scholar
• Ackerman, D. S., Gross, B. L., & Celly, K. S. (2014). Having many choice options seems like a great idea, but…: Student perceptions about the level of choice for a project topic in a marketing course. Journal of Marketing Education, 36(3), 221–232. doi:10.1177/0273475314522038
   Google Scholar
• Aiken, K. D., Heinze, T. C., Meuter, M. L., & Chapman, K. J. (2016). Innovation through collaborative course development: Theory and practice. Marketing Education Review, 26(1), 57–62. doi:10.1080/10528008.2015.1091679
   Google Scholar
• Anvar, M., Khademi, S., Meshkibaf, M. H., Fereidouni, Z., & Ebrahimi, A. (2006). The comparison between teacher centered and student centered educational methods. Journal of Medical Education, 9(1), 31–34.
   Google Scholar
• Ashcroft, L. (1987). Defusing empowering: The what and the why. Language Arts, 64(2), 145–155.
   Google Scholar
• Auh, S., Bell, S. J., McLeod, C. S., & Shih, E. (2007). Co-production and customer loyalty in financial services. Journal of Retailing, 83(3), 359–370. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2007.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon, D. R. (2004, March/April). An examination of two learning style measures and their association with business learning. Journal of Education for Business, 79, 205–208. doi:10.3200/JOEB.79.4.205-208
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, D. R. (2011). Comparing direct versus indirect measures of the pedagogical effectiveness of team testing. Journal of Marketing Education, 33(3), 348–358. doi:10.1177/0273475311420243
   Google Scholar
• Badrinarayanan, V., & Madhavaram, S. (2008). Exploring marketing students’ perceptions of pedagogical innovations using the critical incident technique (CIT) approach. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 12(Summer), 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, J. E. G., & Hui, M. K. M. (1987). Perceived control as a crucial perceptual dimension of the service experience: An experimental study. In C. F. Surprenant (Ed.), Add Value to Your Service (pp. 187–192). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7, 161–186. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00015-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, J. W., & Cohen, A. R. (1962). Explorations in cognitive dissonance. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. K. (2013). Student-centered instruction: Involving students in their own education. Music Educators Journal, 94(5), 30–35. doi:10.1177/00274321080940050108
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. (2002). Scientific inquiry, student learning, and the science curriculum. In R. W. Bybee (Ed.), Learning science and the science of learning (pp. 25–35). Arlington, Virginia: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(1), 3–25. doi:10.1207/pspr.1997.1.issue-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cassidy, S. (2006). Learning style and student self-assessment skill. Education & Training, 48(2/3), 170–177. doi:10.1108/00400910610651791
   Google Scholar
• Celsi, R. L., & Wolfinbarger, M. (2002). Discontinuous classroom innovation: Waves of change for marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 24(1), 64–72. doi:10.1177/0273475302241008
   Google Scholar
• Chao, I. T., Say, T., & Hamilton, D. (2010). Using collaborative course development to achieve online course quality standards. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(3), 106–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychological Review, 99, 365–382. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.2.365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Trost, M. R., & Newsom, J. (1995). Preference for consistency: The development of a valid measure and the discovery of surprising behavioral implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(2), 318–328. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayson, D. E. (2009). Student evaluations in marketing: What is actually being measured? Journal of Marketing Education, 12, 9–17. doi:10.1177/027347539001200302
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan, H., & Craciun, G. (2013). Asking the right questions: Using student-written exams as an innovative approach to learning and evaluation. Marketing Education Review, 23(1), 31–36. doi:10.2753/MER1052-8008230105
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (1986). Empowering minority students: A framework for intervention. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 18–36. doi:10.17763/haer.56.1.b327234461607787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabholkar, P. A. (1996). Consumer evaluation of new technology-based self-service options: An investigation of alternative models of service quality. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(1), 29–51. doi:10.1016/0167-8116(95)00027-5
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Dellande, S., Gilly, M. C., & Graham, J. L. (2004). Gaining compliance and losing weight: The role of the service provider in health care services. Journal of Marketing, 68(3), 78–91. doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.3.78.34764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. F. (1989). Learning: How schools must change. Psychology Today, 23(May), 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Eberly, M. B., Newton, S. E., & Wiggins, R. A. (2001). The syllabus as a tool for student-centered learning. The Journal of General Education, 50(1), 56–74. doi:10.1353/jge.2001.0003
   Google Scholar
• Folkes, V. S. (1988). Recent attribution research in consumer behavior: A review and new directions. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(4), 548–565. doi:10.1086/jcr.1988.14.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franz, R. S. (1998). Whatever you do, don’t treat your students like customers. Journal of Management Education, 22(1), 63–69. doi:10.1177/105256299802200105
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative ‘description of personality’: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1299. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger, E. M., Bevis, T. H., Saka, Y., Sampson, V., & Tate, R. L. (2012). The efficacy of student-centered instruction in supporting science learning. Science, 338, 105–108. doi:10.1126/science.1223709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granitz, N. A. (2001). Active learning and morality: Incorporating greater meaning into marketing education. Marketing Education Review, 11(2), 25–41. doi:10.1080/10528008.2001.11488744
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 21(1), 107–112. doi:10.1080/00223980.1946.9917275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, S. (1991). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Karns, G. L. (2005). An update of marketing student perceptions of learning activities: Structure, preferences, and effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education, 27(2), 163–171. doi:10.1177/0273475305276641
   Google Scholar
• Kayes, C. D. (2005). Internal validity and reliability of Kolb’s learning style inventory version 3 (1999). Journal of Business and Psychology, 20(2), 249–257. doi:10.1007/s10869-005-8262-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In David Levin (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 192–238). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, E. J., & Saegert, S. (1977). Crowding and cognitive control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(3), 175–182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.3.175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 14–19. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McInerney, D. M., & McInerney, V. (1998). Educational psychology: Constructing learning. Sydney, Australia: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• McQuillan, P. J. (2005). Possibilities and pitfalls: A comparative analysis of student empowerment. American Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 639–670. doi:10.3102/00028312042004639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. T., Limbu, Y. B., Xu, B., & Fischbach, S. (2012). Applications of balance theory to faculty effectiveness: An assessment. Marketing Education Review, 22(2), 109–119. doi:10.2753/MER1052-8008220202
   Google Scholar
• Rook, D., & Fisher, R. J. (1995). Normative influences on impulsive buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 305–313. doi:10.1086/jcr.1995.22.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. D. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1–2), 111–139. doi:10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Sierra, J. (2010). Shared responsibility and student learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 32, 104–111. doi:10.1177/0273475309344802
   Google Scholar
• Sitzmann, T., Ely, K., Brown, K., & Bauer, K. (2010). Self-assessment of knowledge: A cognitive learning or affective measure? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9, 169–191. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2010.51428542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. H. (1996). Developing a more interactive classroom: A continuing odyssey. Teaching Sociology, 24(1), 64–75. doi:10.2307/1318899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., Hunter, G., Melton, H., & Goodwin, S. (2011). Student engagement in marketing classes. Journal of Marketing Education, 33, 73–92.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2005). The motivational effects of the classroom environment in facilitating self-regulated learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 27(1), 25–40. doi:10.1177/0273475304273346
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. L., & Mowen, J. C. (1997). The separateness-connectedness self-schema: Scale development and application to message construction. Psychology & Marketing, 14, 185–207. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wheatley, M. (1999). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, C. M. (2003). The effects of creating psychological ownership among students in group projects. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(3), 241–249. doi:10.1177/0273475303257553
   Google Scholar
• Wright, G. B. (2011). Student-centered learning in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(3), 92–97.
   Google Scholar