THE DEFINING DOZEN: UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS PRECONCEIVED VIEWS OF MARKETING

References

• American Marketing Association. (n.d.). About AMA: Definition of marketing. Retrieved from https://www.ama.org/AboutAMA/Pages/Definition-of-Marketing.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Barcus, F. E. (1959). Communications content: Analysis of the research 1900–1958 (a content analysis of content analysis). ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation.) University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Camey, J. P., & Williams, J. K. (2004). Selling principles: Influencing principles of marketing students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward marketing as a discipline. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(2), 154–160. doi:10.1177/0273475304265541
   Google Scholar
• Celuch, K., & Slama, M. (1998). Critical thinking as an integrative theme for teaching lifelong learning skills in marketing. Marketing Education Review, 8(3), 1–12. doi:10.1080/10528008.1998.11488639
   Google Scholar
• Dailey, R. M., & Kim, J. S. (2001). To what extent are principles of marketing students market oriented? The review category: Marketing education. Marketing Education Review, 11(1), 57–72. doi:10.1080/10528008.2001.11488732
   Google Scholar
• DeSimone, F., & Buzza, J. (2013). Experiential learning: Improving the efficacy of an undergraduate business degree. American Journal of Business Education, 6(1), 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrell, L., & Gonzalez, G. (2004). Beliefs and expectations of principles of marketing students. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(2), 116–122. doi:10.1177/0273475304265543
   Google Scholar
• Grewal, D., & Levy, M. (2016). Marketing (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hanssens, D. M., & Pauwels, K. H. (2016). Demonstrating the value of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 173–190. doi:10.1509/jm.15.0417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugstad, P. (1997). Marketing the marketing major. Journal of Marketing Education, 19(1), 4–13. doi:10.1177/027347539701900102
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, M. L., & Adler, R. D. (2007). Proactive inhibition to learning marketing: An assessment and a remedy. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 11, 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Keaveney, S. M. (1995). Customer switching behavior in service industries: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing, 59(2), 71–82. doi:10.2307/1252074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerin, R. A., & Hartley, S. W. (2017). Marketing (13th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2016). Principles of marketing (16th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.
   Google Scholar
• LaBarbera, P. A., & Simonoff, J. S. (1999). Toward enhancing the quality and quantity of marketing majors. Journal of Marketing Education, 21(1), 4–13. doi:10.1177/0273475399211002
   Google Scholar
• Lamberton, C., & Stephen, A. T. (2016). A thematic exploration of digital, social media, and mobile marketing: Research evolution from 2000 to 2015 and an agenda for future inquiry. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 146–172. doi:10.1509/jm.15.0415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, J. W., Smith, R. M., Levy, J. J., Leong, F. T., & Gibson, L. W. (2009). Personality characteristics of business majors as defined by the big five and narrow personality traits. Journal of Education for Business, 84(4), 200–205. doi:10.3200/JOEB.84.4.200-205
   Google Scholar
• Noël, M., Michaels, C., & Levas, M. G. (2003). The relationship of personality traits and self-monitoring behavior to choice of business major. Journal of Education for Business, 78(3), 153–157. doi:10.1080/08832320309599713
   Google Scholar
• Perreault, W. D., & Leigh, L. E. (1989). Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(2), 135–148. doi:10.2307/3172601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pride, W. M., & Ferrell, O. C. (2016). Marketing (18th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Rosengren, K. E. (1981). Advances in Scandinavia content analysis: An introduction. In K. E. Rosengren (Ed.), Advances in content analysis (pp. 9–19). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, N., & Kelly, M. (2015). How college business students learn with emphasis on differences between majors. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 12(3), 223–230. doi:10.19030/tlc.v12i3
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, S. R., & Wald, K. A. (2013). A picture is worth a 1,000 words: Using collage to explore students’ beliefs and feelings about marketing. Marketing Education Review, 23(1), 11–16. doi:10.2753/MER1052-8008230102
   Google Scholar
• Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Bristol, PA: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar