240
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular Article

SUMMATIVE AND FORMATIVE EVALUATION OF MARKETING TEACHING PORTFOLIOS: A PEDAGOGICAL COMPETENCE-BASED RUBRIC

ORCID Icon, &

References

  • Andrade, H. G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13–19.
  • Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Class assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. The Journal of Higher Education, 66(1), 108–111. doi:10.1080/00221546.1995.11774763
  • Babin, L. A., Shaffer, T. R., & Tomas, A. M. (2002). Teaching portfolios: Uses and development. Journal of Marketing Education, 24(1), 35–42. doi:10.1177/0273475302241005
  • Bacon, D. R., Johnson, C. J., & Stewart, K. A. (2016). Nonresponse bias in student evaluations of teaching. Marketing Education Review, 26(2), 93–104. doi:10.1080/10528008.2016.1166442
  • Baglione, S. L., & Tucci, L. A. (2019). Students’ perceptions of teaching excellence: A tradeoff analysis. Marketing Education Review, 29(3), 154–163. doi:10.1080/10528008.2019.1642114
  • Bak, H., & Kim, D. H. (2015). Too much emphasis on research? An empirical examination of the relationship between research and teaching in multitasking environments. Research in Higher Education, 56(8), 843–860. doi:10.1007/s11162-015-9372-0
  • Bankauskienė, N., Aldona, A., & Nijolė, Č. (2005). The expression of teacher competencies in action research field: The case-based study of KTU teacher education program pedagogy. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/151392.htm
  • Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation.
  • Cantor, A. B. (1996). Sample-size calculations for Cohen’s kappa. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 150–153. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.150
  • Carter, R. E. (2016). Faculty scholarship has a profound positive association with student evaluations of teaching—except when it doesn’t. Journal of Marketing Education, 38(1), 18–36. doi:10.1177/0273475315604671
  • Chapman, J., Schetzsle, S., & Wahlers, R. (2016). An innovative, experiential-learning project for sales management and professional selling students. Marketing Education Review, 26(1), 45–50. doi:10.1080/10528008.2015.1091674
  • Chen, C. Y. (2015). A study showing research has been valued over teaching in higher education. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(3), 15–32. doi:10.14434/josotl.v15i3.13319
  • Clayson, D. E., & Haley, D. A. (2011). Are students telling us the truth? A critical look at the student evaluation of teaching. Marketing Education Review, 21(2), 101–112. doi:10.2753/MER1052-8008210201
  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104
  • Draves, T. J. (2009). Portfolio assessment in student teaching: A reliability study. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 19(1), 25–38. doi:10.1177/1057083709343906
  • Flack, V. F., Afifi, A. A., Lachenbruch, P. A., & Schouten, H. J. A. (1988). Sample size determinations for the two rater kappa statistic. Psychometrika, 53(3), 321–325. doi:10.1007/BF02294215
  • Flaherty, C. (2018). Teaching Eval Shake-up. Inside Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/05/22/most-institutions-say-they-value-teaching-how-they-assess-it-tells-different-story
  • From, J. (2017). Pedagogical digital competence – Between values, knowledge and skills. Higher Education Studies, 7(2), 43–50. doi:10.5539/hes.v7n2p43
  • Hostetter, L. R., Jr. (2017). Teaching innovations in marketing: A brand-based student-led inquiry of marketing concepts and practices. Marketing Education Review, 27(2), 66–71. doi:10.1080/10528008.2016.1274633
  • Humphrey, W., Jr, Laverie, D., & Muñoz, C. (2020). The use and value of badges: Leveraging salesforce trailhead badges for marketing technology education. Journal of Marketing Education, 027347532091231. doi:10.1177/0273475320912319
  • Hunt, S. D., & Madhavaram, S. (2006). Teaching marketing strategy: Using resource-advantage theory as an integrative theoretical foundation. Journal of Marketing Education, 28(2), 93–105. doi:10.1177/0273475306288397
  • Hutchings, P. (1998). The course portfolio: How faculty can examine their teaching to advance practice and improve student learning. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
  • Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
  • Keen, K. (1992). Competence: What is it and how can it be developed? In J. Lowyck, P. de Potter, & J. Elen (Eds.), Instructional Design: Implementation Issues (pp. 111–112). Brussels, Belgium: IBM Education Center.
  • Kelly, K., Lee, S. H., Bowen Ray, H., & Kandaurova, M. (2018). Using the photovoice methodology to increase engagement and sharpen students’ analytical skills regarding cultures, lifestyles, and markets internationally. Marketing Education Review, 28(2), 69–74. doi:10.1080/10528008.2018.1450093
  • Kemp, A., Randon McDougal, E., & Syrdal, H. (2019). The matchmaking activity: An experiential learning exercise on influencer marketing for the digital marketing class. Journal of Marketing Education, 41(2), 141–153. doi:10.1177/0273475318803415
  • King, B. (1991). Thinking about linking portfolios with assessment center exercises: Examples from the teacher assessment project. Teacher Education Quarterly, 18(3), 31–48.
  • Knapper, C. K. (1995). The origins of teaching portfolios. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 6(1), 45–56.
  • Koehler, M. J., Greenhalgh, S. P., Rosenberg, J. M., & Keenan, S. F. (2017). What the tech is going on with teachers’ digital teaching portfolios? Using the TPACK framework to analyze teachers’ technological understanding. The Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25, 31–59.
  • Landis, J., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310
  • Laverie, D. (2002). Improving teaching through improving evaluation: A guide to course portfolios. Journal of Marketing Education, 24(2), 104–113. doi:10.1177/0273475302242003
  • Madhavaram, S., & Laverie, D. A. (2010). Developing pedagogical competence: Issues and implications for marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 32(2), 197–213. doi:10.1177/0273475309360162
  • McIntyre, F. S., & Tanner, J. F., Jr. (2004). The scholarship of teaching: A study of marketing education journal publications. Marketing Education Review, 14(1), 33–44. doi:10.1080/10528008.2004.11488852
  • Morgan, B. M. (1999). Portfolios in a preservice teacher field-based program: Evolution of a rubric for performance assessment. Education, 119(3), 416.
  • Newell, J., Dahm, K., & Newell, H. (2002). Rubric development and inter-rater reliability issues in assessing learning outcomes. Chemical Engineering Education, 36(3), 212–215.
  • Prins, F., Nadolski, R., Berlanga, A., Drachsler, H., Hummel, H., & Koper, R. (2008). Competence description for personal recommendations: The importance of identifying the complexity of learning and performance situations (Report). Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 141–152.
  • Reddy, Y., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 435–448. doi:10.1080/02602930902862859
  • Robinson, M. (2004). Student teaching portfolio assessment rubric (Unpublished manuscript).
  • Rodzevičiūtė, E. (2006). Substantiation of content and structure of a secondary school teacher’s pedagogical competency (Doctoral Dissertation). Vilnius Pedagogical University.
  • Rodzevičiūtė, E. (2010). Formation of student teachers’ pedagogical competence during teaching practice. In G.-B. V. Carlsburg (Ed.), The quality of education and culture. Theoretical and practical dimensions (Vol. 17, pp. 313–322). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften, Vilnius, Lithuania.
  • Sanchez, R. (2000). Modular architectures, knowledge assets and organizational learning: New management processes for product creation. International Journal of Technology Management, 19(6), 610–629. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2000.002839
  • Schneckenberg, D., & Wildt, J. (2010). Understanding the concept of eCompetence for academic staff. doi:10.1.1.457.3464&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  • Schönwetter, D. J., Sokal, L., Friesen, M., & Lynn Taylor, K. (2002). Teaching philosophies reconsidered: A conceptual model for the development and evaluation of teaching philosophy statements. International Journal for Academic Development, 7(1), 83–97. doi:10.1080/13601440210156501
  • Seldin, P. (1991). The teaching portfolio: A practical guide to improved performance and promotion/tenure decisions (1st ed.). Boston, MA: Anker.
  • Seldin, P. (1997). The teaching portfolio: A practical guide to improved performance and promotion/tenure decisions (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Anker.
  • Seldin, P., Miller, E., & Seldin, C. A. (2010). The teaching portfolio: A practical guide to improved performance and promotion/tenure decisions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Shah, P., Madhavaram, S., & Laverie, D. A. (2019). Developing and demonstrating effective pedagogy in marketing education: Pedagogical competence as an organizing framework for teaching portfolios. Marketing Education Review, 29(4), 283–304. doi:10.1080/10528008.2019.1657775
  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  • Stellmack, M., Konheim-Kalkstein, Y., Manor, J., Massey, A., & Schmitz, J. (2009). An assessment of reliability and validity of a rubric for grading APA-style introductions. Teaching of Psychology, 36(2), 102–107. doi:10.1080/00986280902739776
  • Stevens, D. D., & Levi, A. J. (2005). Introduction to rubrics: An assessment tool to save grading time, convey feedback, and promote student learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
  • Stiggins, R. (2001). The unfulfilled promise of class assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(3), 5–15. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2001.tb00065.x
  • Suciu, A. I., & Mata, L. (2011). Pedagogical competences - The key to efficient education. International On-line Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 411–423.
  • Thyroff, A. (2019). Teaching qualitative marketing research: An experiential approach. Marketing Education Review, 29(1), 75–87. doi:10.1080/10528008.2018.1514979
  • Tinsley, H. E. A., & Weiss, D. J. (2000). Interrater reliability and agreement. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of Applied Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modeling (pp. 95–124). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-012691360-6/50005-7
  • Trevitt, C., Stocks, C., & Quinlan, K. (2012). Advancing assessment practice in continuing professional learning: Toward a richer understanding of teaching portfolios for learning and assessment. International Journal for Academic Development, 17(2), 163–175. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2011.589004
  • Trigwell, K., Martin, E., Benjamin, J., & Prosser, M. (2000). Scholarship of teaching: A model. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(2), 155–168. doi:10.1080/072943600445628
  • Vinuales, G., & Harris, J. (2017). An experiential social media project: Comparing client-sponsored and non-client-sponsored alternatives. Marketing Education Review, 27(3), 161–171. doi:10.1080/10528008.2017.1323552
  • Yair, G. (2008). Can we administer the scholarship of teaching? Lessons from outstanding professors in higher education. Higher Education, 55(4), 447–459. doi:10.1007/s10734-007-9066-4
  • Yürekli, K. A. (2019). Pedagogy in HE: Does it matter? Studies in Higher Education, 44(1), 111–119. doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1340444

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.