References
- Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11–39). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
- Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
- Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076477
- Alnawas, I. (2015). Student orientaion in higher education: Development of the construct. Higher Education, (69), 625–652. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9794-1
- Andrade, E. B., & Ho, T. H. (2009). Gaming emotions in social interactions. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(4), 539–552. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/599221
- Baglione, S. L., & Tucci, L. A. (2019). Students’ perception of teaching excellence: A tradeoff analysis. Marketing Education Review, 29(3), 154–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2019.1642114
- Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25(3), 285–301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(91)90021-H
- Bennett, S. K. (1982). Student perceptions of and expectations for male and female instructors: Evidence relating to the question of gender bias in teaching evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.2.170
- Braga, M., Paccagnella, M., & Pellizazari, M. (2014). Evaluating students’ evaluations of professors. Economics of Education Review, 41, 71–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.04.002
- Bristow, D. N., Schneider, K. C., & Schuler, D. K. (2002). The brand dependence scale: Measuring consumers’ use of brand name to differentiate among product alternatives. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 11(6), 343–356. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420210445488
- Bunce, L., Baird, A., & Jones, S. E. (2017). The student-as-consumer approach in higher education and its effects on academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 1958–1978. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1127908
- Buss, A. H., & Briggs, S. R. (1984). Drama and the self in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1310–1324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1310
- Chiu, S., Hong, F., & Chiu, S. (2016). Undergraduates’ Day-To-Day Lying behaviors: Implications, targets, and psychological characteristics. Social Behavior and Personality, 44(8), 1329–1338. doi:https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2016.44.8.1329
- Clayson, D. (2014). A multi-discipline review of student reacher evaluations. Retrieved from https://business.uni.edu/clayson/set
- Clayson, D. E. (2005b). Within-class variability in student-teacher evaluations: Example and problems. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 3(1), 109–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2005.00055.x
- Clayson, D. E., & Haley, D. A. (1990). Student evaluations in marketing: What is actually being measured? Journal of Marketing Education, 12(3), 9–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/027347539001200302
- Clayson, D. E., & Haley, D. A. (2005). Marketing models in education: Students as customers, products, or partners. Marketing Education Review, 15(1), 1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2005.11488884
- Clayson, D. E., & Haley, D. A. (2011). Are students telling us the truth? A critical look at the student evaluation of teaching. Marketing Education Review, 21(2), 101–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.2753/MER1052-8008210201
- Cowley, E., & Anthony, C. I. (2019). Deception memory: When will consumers remember their lies? Journal of Consumer Research, 46(1), 180–199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy066
- Cuthbert, R. (2010). Students as customers. Higher Education Review, 42(3), 3–25.
- Delucchi, M., & Koregen, K. (2002). “We’re the customer-we pay the tuition”: Student consumerism among undergraduate sociology majors. Teaching Sociology, 30(1), 100–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3211524
- DePaulo, B. M., & Kashy, D. A. (1998). Everyday lies in close and causal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 63–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.63
- DePaulo, B. M., Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. E., Wyer, M. M., & Epstein, J. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 979–995. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.979
- Dershowitz, A. (1994). Contrary to popular opinion. New York, NY: Berkley Books.
- Emery, C., Kramer, T., & Tian, R. (2001). Customers vs. products: Adopting an effective approach to business students. Quality Assurance in Education, 9(2), 110–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880110389681
- Finney, T. G., & Finney, R. Z. (2010). Are students their universities customers? An exploratory study. Education + Training, 52(4), 276–291. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911011050954
- Flaherty, C. (2018). Teaching Eval Shake-Up. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/05/22/most-institutions-say-theyvalue-teaching-how-they-assess-it-tells-different-story
- Gillmore, G. M., & Greenwald, A. G. (1999). Using statistical adjustment to reduce biases in student ratings. American Psychologist, 54(7), 518–519. (Original data published: Greenwald, Anthony G. 1991. American Psychologist, 52, 1182 86.). doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.518
- Goldberg, G., & Callahan, J. (1991). Objectivity of Student Evaluations of Instructors. Journal of Education for Business, 66(6), 377–378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.1991.10117505
- Guilbault, M. (2016). Students as customers in higher education: Reframing the debate. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 26(2), 132–142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2016.1245234
- Hamermesh, D. S., & Parker, A. (2005). Beauty in the classroom: Instructors’ pulchritude and putatvie pedagogical productivity. Economics of Education Review, 24(4), 369–376. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.07.013
- Harding, T. S., Mayhew, M. J., Finelli, C. J., & Carpenter, D. D. (2007). The theory of planned behavior as a model of academic dishonesty in engineering and humanities undergraduates. Ethics & Behavior, 17(3), 255–279. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420701519239
- Hart, C. L., Hudson, L. P., Fillmore, D. G., & Griffith, J. D. (2006). Managerial beliefs about the behavioral cues of deception. Individual Differences Research, 4(3), 176–184.
- Kashy, D. A., & DePaulo, B. M. (1996). Who lies? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 1037–1051. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.1037
- Kierstead, D., D’Agostino, P., & Dill, H. (1988). Sex role stereotyping of college professors: Bias in students’ rating of instructors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 342–344. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.342
- Koris, R., Örtenblad, A., Kerem, K., & Ojala, T. (2015). Student-customer orientation at a higher education institution: The perspective of undergraduate business students. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 25(1), 29–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2014.972486
- Lesnik-Oberstein, K. (2015, July 6). Let UK Universities Do what they do best – teaching and research. The Guardian, Letters. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/jul/06/let-uk-universities-do-whatthey-do-best-teaching-and-research
- Lin, T. (2008, December 2). Economic behavior in student ratings of teaching: revenge or reward? Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1318177
- Martin, J. (1998). Evaluating faculty based on student opinions, problems, implications and recommendations from Deming’s theory of management perspective. Issues in Accounting Education, 13, 1079–1094.
- Mayhew, M. J., Hubbard, S. M., Finelli, C. J., Harding, T. S., & Carpenter, D. D. (2009). Using structural equation modeling to validate the theory of planned behavior as a model for predicting student cheating. The Review of Higher Education, 32(4), 441–468. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0080
- Molesworth, M., Nixon, E., & Scullion, R. (2009). Having, being and higher education: The marketisation of the university and the transformation of the student into consumer. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(3), 277–287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510902898841
- Nichols, T. (2017). The death of expertise. New York: Oxford University Press, New York City.
- NPR. (2015, April 26). Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2015/04/26/401953167/what-ifstudents-could-fire-their-professors
- Nyberg, D. (1993). The varnished truth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Obermiller, C., Fleenor, P., & Raven, P. (2005). Students and customers or products: Perceptions and preferences of faculty and students. Marketing Education Review, 15(2), 27–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2005.11488902
- Palmer, S. (2012). Student evaluation of teaching: Keeping in touch with reality. Quality in Higher Education, 18(3), 297–311. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2012.730336
- Ponzo, M., & Scoppa, V. (2013). Professors’ beauty, ability, and teaching evaluations in Italy. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 13(2), 811–835. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2012-0041
- Popejoy, M. W. (2015) Why do good teachers get poor evaluations from students and what should be done? Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-do-good-teachers-get-poor-evaluations-from-what-dr-michael-w-/
- Robinson, W. P., Shepherd, A., & Heywood, J. (1998). Truth, equivocation/ concealment,and lies in job applications and doctor-patient communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17(2), 149–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X980172001
- Rojstaczer, S. (2020, September 21). National trends in grade inflation. Retrieved from https://gradeinflation.com/
- Sacks, P. (1996). Generation X goes to college, open court. Chicago, IL.
- Sajé, N. (2005). Teaching for Tips. Liberal Education, 91(1), 48–50.
- Saunders, D. B. (2015). They do not buy it: Exploring the extent to which entering first- year students view themselves as customers. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 25(1), 5–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2014.969798
- Searcy, Y. D. (2017). Let me speak to the manager! Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2017/06/05/higher-ed-should-view-public-not-student-customer-essay
- Seldin, P. (1999). Changing practices in evaluation teaching: a practical guide to improving faculty performance and promotion/tenure decisions. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Co., Inc.
- Serota, K. B., Levine, T. R., & Boster, F. J. (2010). The prevalence of lying in america: Three studies of self-reported lies. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 2–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01366.x
- Solomon, R. C. (1993). Lying and deception in everyday life. The Guilford Press.
- Sprague, J., & Massoni, K. (2005). Student evaluations and gendered expectations: What we can’t count can hurt us. Sex Roles, 53(11), 779–793. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-8292-4
- Stanfel, L. (1995). Measuring the accuracy of student evaluations of teaching. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 22(2), 117–125.
- Stark, P., & Freishtat, R. (2014). An evaluation of course evaluations. ScienceOpen. Retrieved from https://www.scienceopen.com/document/vid/42e6aae5–‐246b–‐4900–‐8015dc99b467b6e4?0
- Stone, T. H., Jawahar, I. M., & Kisamore, J. L. (2009). Using the theory of planned behavior and cheating justifications to predict academic misconduct. Career Development International, 14(3), 221–241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430910966415
- Stone, T. H., Jawahar, I. M., & Kisamore, J. L. (2010). Predicting academic misconduct intentions and behavior using the theory of planned behavior and personality. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(1), 35–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530903539895
- Uttl, B., & Smibert, D. (2017). Student evaluations of teaching: Teaching quantitative courses can be hazardous to one’s career. PeerJ, 5, e3299. doi:https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3299
- Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and implications for professional practice. Wiley.
- Wachtel, H. K. (1998). Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 191–212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293980230207