The Cutting Edge of Forensic Interviewing

References

• Alaggia, R. (2004). Many ways of telling: Expanding conceptualization of child sexual abuse disclosure. Child Abuse & Neglect: An International Journal, 28(11), 1213–1227. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.03.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, G. D., Anderson, J. N., & Gilgun, J. F. (2014). The influence of narrative practice techniques on child behaviors in forensic interviews. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 23(6), 615–634. doi:10.1080/10538712.2014.932878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. (2013). The CornerHouse forensic interview protocol: An evolution in practice for almost 25 years. APSAC Advisor, 1, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., Ellefson, J., Lashley, Lukas, A., Miller, S., Olinger, S., … Weigman, J. (2010). The Cornerhouse forensic interview protocol: RATAC®. W. M. Cooley Journal of Practice and Clinical Law, 1, 193–331.
   Google Scholar
• Bruck, M., & Melnyk, I. (2004). Individual differences in children’s suggestibility: A review and synthesis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(8), 947–996. doi:10.1002/acp.1070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, E., Fukari, H., Dimitrius, J., & Krooth, R. (2001). Anatomy of the McMartin child molestation case. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Carnes, C., Wilson, C., Nelson-Gardell, D., & Orgassa, U. (2001). Extended forensic evaluation when sexual abuse is suspected: A multi-site study. Child Maltreatment, 6(3), 230–242. doi:10.1177/1077559501006003004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1993). The suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403–439. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA). Reauthorization Act of 2010 (P.L. 111–320).
   Google Scholar
• ChildFirst Interview. Retrived from https://www.zeroabuseproject.org/education-training/childfirst-forensic-interview-protocol/
   Google Scholar
• Conte, J., Sorenson, E., Fogarty, L., & Dalla Rosa, J. (1991). Evaluating children’s reports of sexual abuse: Results from a survey of professionals. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61(3), 428–437. doi:10.1037/h0079264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CornerHouse. (2018). The cornerhouse forensic interview protocol. Retrieved from https://www.cornerhousemn.org/forensicinterviews.html
   Google Scholar
• Duron, J., & Remco, F. (2020). Consideration for pursuing multiple session forensic interviews in child sexual abuse investigations. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 29.
   Google Scholar
• Everson, M., Ragsdale, C., Snider, S., & Rodriguez, S. (2019). RADAR child forensic interview model. Retrieved from Dr. Everson at [email protected]
   Google Scholar
• Faller, K. C. (2007). Chapter 13, Children who do not want to disclose. In K. C. Faller (Ed.), Interviewing children about sexual abuse (pp. 175–190). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faller, K. C. (2015). Forty years of forensic interviewing of children suspected of sexual abuse: Historical benchmarks. Social Sciences, 4, 34–65. doi:10.3390/socsci4010034
   Google Scholar
• Faller, K. C. (n.d.). Forensic interviewing. In R. Geffner, J. White, V. Vieth, A. Rosenbaum, K. Hamberger, & V. Vaughan-Eden (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal violence across the lifespan. New York, NY: Springer Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Faller, K. C., Cordisco-Steele, L., & Nelson-Gardell, D. (2010). Allegations of sexual abuse of a child: What to do when a single forensic interview isn’t enough. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse: Research, Treatment, & Program Innovations for Victims, Survivors, & Offenders, 19(5), 572–589. doi:10.1080/10538712.2010.511985
   Google Scholar
• Faller, K. C., & Nelson-Gardell, D. (2010). Extended evaluations in cases of child sexual abuse: How many sessions are sufficient? Journal of Child Sexual Abuse: Research, Treatment, & Program Innovations for Victims, Survivors, & Offenders, 19(6), 648–668. doi:10.1080/10538712.2010.522494
   Google Scholar
• Finkelhor, D., Williams, L., & Burns, N. (1993). Nursery crimes: Sexual abuse in daycare. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. (1991). The sex abuse hysteria: The Salem witch trials revisited. Cresskill, NJ: Creative Therapeutics.
   Google Scholar
• Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., & Katz, C. (2014). Allegation rates in forensic child abuse investigations: Comparing the revised and standard NICHD protocols. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(3), 336–344. doi:10.1037/a0037391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hershkowitz, I., & Terner, A. (2007). The effects of repeated interviewing on children’s forensic statements of sexual abuse. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31, 1131–1143. doi:10.1002/acp.1319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemfuss, Z., & Olaguez, A. (2020). Individual differences in children’s suggestibility: An updated review. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 29(2).
   Google Scholar
• La Rooy, D., Lamb, M., & Pipe, M.-E. (2009). Repeated Interviewing: A critical evaluation of the risks and potential benefits. In K. Kuehnle & M. Connell (Eds.), Child sexual abuse: Research, evaluation, and testimony for the courts (pp. 327–364). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Esplin, P. W., & Horowitz, D. (2007). Structured forensic interview protocols improve the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: A review of research using the NICHD investigative interview protocol. Child Abuse and Neglect, 31, 1201–1231. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.03.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, T. D. (1999). Questioning children: The effects of suggestive and repeated questioning.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, T. D. (2005). Ten step investigative interview (version 2). Retrieved from https://works.bepress.com/thomaslyon/S/
   Google Scholar
• Malloy, L., & Quas, J. (2009). Chapter 12: Children’s suggestibility: Areas of consensus and controversy. In K. Kuehnle & M. Connell (Eds.), Child sexual abuse: Research, evaluation, and testimony for the courts (pp. 267–297). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, J. E. B. (1994). The backlash: Child protection under fire. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Newlin, C., Steele, L. C., Chamberlin, A., Anderson, J., Kenniston, J., Russell, A., … Vaughan-Eden, V. (2015). Child forensic interviewing: Best practices. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, US Department of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.ojjdp.gov/pubs/248749.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pipe, M. E., Lamb, M., Orbach, Y., & Cederborg, A. C. (2007). Child sexual abuse: Disclosure, delay, & denial. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• State of Michigan Governor’s Task Force On Child Abuse and Neglect and Department Of Human Services. (2002). Forensic interviewing protocol (3rd ed.). Retrieved from http://www.michigan.gov/documents/dhs/DHS-PUB-0779_211637_7.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Summit, R. (1983). The child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome. Child Abuse & Neglect, 7, 177–193. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(83)90070-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waterman, J., Kelly, R., Oliveri, M., & McCord, J. (1993). Behind the playground walls: Sexual abuse in pre-schools. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar