References
- American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. AERA.
- Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018362
- Association, A. P. (2013). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology. American Psychologist, 68(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029889
- Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. (2017). Practice guidelines for assessment, treatment, and intervention with adolescents who have engaged in sexually abusive behavior. Author. Available at https://www.atsa.com/Public/Adolescent/ATSA_2017_Adolescent_Guidelines_TOC.pdf
- Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. Registration and community notification of children and adolescents adjudicated of a sexual crime: Recommendations for evidence-based reform. (June, 2020a). Author. November 18, 2020. https://www.atsa.com/Public/Adolescent/RegistrationCommunityNotificationofChildrenandAdolescents.pdf
- Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers (2020b). Sound research. Available at: https://www.atsa.com/research
- Augur Enterprises, Inc. (2011). MIDSA clinical manual. Bend, OR: Author. July 12, 2017 http://www.midsa.us/learnmore.php.
- Boer, D. P., Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Webster, C. D. (1997). Manual for the sexual violence risk-20. The Mental Health, Law, & Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
- Bumby, K., & Gilligan, L. (2014). Transition-aged individuals who have committed sex offenses: Considerations for the emerging adult population. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Center for Sex Offender Management.
- Caldwell, M. (2019, June 13). Redemption of juveniles adjudicated for sexual offenses. Presentation at the Conference of the Wisconsin Chapter of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers (Wi ATSA), Madison, WI.
- Epperson, D. L., Ralston, C. A., Fowers, D., DeWitt, J., & Gore, K. S. (2006). Actuarial risk assessment with juveniles who offend sexually: Development of the juvenile sexual offense recidivism risk assessment tool-II (JSORRAT-II). In D. Prescott (Ed.), Risk assessment of youth who have sexually abused: Theory, controversy, and emerging strategies (pp. 118–169). Woods ‘N’ Barnes.
- Epperson, D. L., & Ralston, C. A. (2015). Development and validation of the juvenile sexual offender recidivism risk assessment tool -II. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(6), 529–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063213514452
- Fagundes, M., & Viglione, D. (2021). Factors related to treatment completion for sexually abusive behavior of sexually abusive youth. Manuscript submitted for publication.
- Fanniff, A. M., & Letourneau, E. J. (2012). Another piece of the puzzle: Psychometric properties of the J-SOAP-II. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24(4), 378–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063211431842
- Glaser, D. (2018). Important considerations in selecting a risk assessment tool. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse: Special Issue on Risk Assessment of Sexually Abusive Youth, 27(8), 918–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2018.1474514
- Griffin, H. L., Beech, A., Print, B., Bradshaw, H., & Quayle, J. (2008). The development and initial testing of the AIM2 framework to assess risk and strengths in young people who sexually offend. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 14(3), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600802366593
- Hempel, I., Buck, N., Cima, M., & Van Marle, H. (2013). Review of risk assessment instruments for juvenile sex offenders: What is next? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(2), 208–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X11428315
- Hiscox, S. P., Witt, P. H., & Haran, S. J. (2007). Juvenile risk assessment scale (JRAS): A predictive validity study. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 35(4), 503–539. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/009318530703500406
- Horcajo-Gil, P. J., Dujo-López, V., Andreu-Rodríguez, J. M. Y., & Marín-Rullán, M. (2019). Valoración y gestión del riesgo de reincidencia delictiva en menores infractores: Una revisión de instrumentos. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 29(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.5093/apj2018a15
- Kang, T., Beltrani, A., Manheim, M., Spriggs, S., Nishimura, B., Sinclair, S., Stachniuk, M., Pate, E., Righthand, S., Prentky, R., & Worling, J. (2019). Development of a risk/treatment needs and progress protocol for juveniles with sex offenses. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 5(2), 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000191
- Knight, R. A., & Sims-Knight, J. E. (2014). Assessment of dynamic treatment targets for juveniles who sexually offend. In D. S. Bromberg & W. T. O’Donahue, (Eds.), Toolkit for working with juvenile sex offenders (pp. 29–68). Elsevier. 10 March 2014 Available online. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-405948-1.00002-5
- Martinez, R., Rosenfeld, B., Cruise, K., & Martin, J. (2015). Predictive validity of the J-SOAPII: Does accuracy differ across settings? International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 14(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2015.1019683
- Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2009). MEGA♪: A new paradigm in protocol assessing sexually abusive children and adolescents. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 2(2), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361520902922434
- Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2010). MEGA : An ecological risk assessment tool of risk and protective factors for assessing sexually abusive children and adolescents. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 19(7), 734–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2010.515542
- Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2013). MEGA♪: A new paradigm in risk assessment tools for sexually abusive youth. Journal of Family Violence, 28(6), 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9527-8
- Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2016). MEGA♪: Cross-validation findings on sexually abusive females: Implications for risk assessment and clinical practice. Journal of Family Violence, 31(7), 903–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9845-8
- Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2018a). Family Lovemap and erotically related protective factors. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse: special issue on Risk Assessment of Sexually Abusive Youth, 27(8), 901–917. Published online. 31 Jul. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2018.1494655
- Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2018b). MEGA♪: Empirical findings on the preternatural: Sexually violent and predatory sexually violent youth. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, Published online 5 December 2018 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-018-0242-8
- Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2019). Contemporary risk assessment tools: Should we use them for sexually abusive children ages 4 to 12 years? Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma. Published Online. 18 June 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-019-00267-z
- Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2020a). Emerging adults who are sexually abusive: MEGA♪’s investigative findings. Abuse: An International Impact Journal, 1(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.37576/abuse.2020.005
- Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2020b). MEGA tool: An analysis of “risk/treatment needs and progress protocol” by Kang, Beltrani, Manheim, Spriggs, Nishimura, Sinclair, Stachniuk, Pate, Righthand, Prentky, and Worling (2019). Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 29(3), 351–372. Published online. 5 Mar 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2020.1733161
- Miccio-Fonseca, L. C., & Rasmussen, L. A. (2009). New nomenclature for sexually abusive youth: Naming and assessing sexually violent and predatory offenders. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 18(1), 106–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926770802616431
- Miccio-Fonseca, L. C., & Rasmussen, L. A. (2014). MEGA♪: Empirical support for nomenclature on the anomalies: Sexually violent and predatory youth. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 1–17. Published online 2 May 2014 https://doi.org/10.1177/030624X14533265
- Miccio-Fonseca, L. C., & Rasmussen, L. A. (2018). Scientific evolution of clinical and risk assessment of sexually abusive youth: A comprehensive review of empirical tools. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse: Special Issue on Risk Assessment of Sexually Abusive Youth, 27(8), 871–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2018.1537337
- Miner, M. H. (2002). Factors associated with recidivism of juveniles: An analysis of serious juvenile sex offenders. Journal of Research on Crime and Delinquency, 39(4), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242702237287
- Miner, M. H. (2019). Civil commitment of youthful offenders: Issues and concerns. In D. S. Bromberg & W. T. O’Donahue, (Eds.), Sexually violent predators: A clinical science handbook (pp. 61–72). AG, Switzerland: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04696-5_5
- National Center on the Sexual Behavior of Youth (NCSBY) Resources | National Center on the Sexual Behavior of Youth (ncsby.org) 22 February 2021
- Powers-Sawyer, A. B., & Miner, M. H. (2009). Actuarial prediction of juvenile recidivism: The static variables of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II (J-SOAP-II). Sexual Offender Treatment, 4(2), May 6, 2011 http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/index.php?id=78&type=123
- Prentky, R., Janus, E., Barbaree., H., Schwartz, B., & Kafka., M. (2006). Sexually violent predators in the courtroom: Science on trial. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12(4), 357–393. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.12.4.357
- Prentky, R., Li, N. C., Righthand, S., Schuler, A., Cavanaugh, D., & Lee, A. F. (2010). Assessing risk of sexually abusive behavior in a child welfare sample. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28(1), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.920
- Prentky, R., & Righthand, S. (2003). Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II (J-SOAP-II) Manual. NCJ 202316. Office of juvenile justice and delinquency prevention, juvenile justice clearinghouse. May 14, 2010, www.csom.org/pugs/J-SOAP.pdf
- Prentky, R. A., Harris, B., Frizzell, K., & Righthand, S. (2000). Development and validation of an actuarial instrument for assessing risk among juvenile sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 12(2), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320001200201
- Prentky, R. A., Righthand, S., Worling, J., & Kang, T. (2020, June). Final report development and implementation project for the Youth Needs and Progress Scale (YNPS). Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Management, Assessment, Registration, and Tracking (SMART). Document Number: 254814, Date Received: 6/2020 Award Number:2016-AW-BX-K004
- Ralston, C. A., Epperson, D. L., & Edwards, S. E. (2016). Cross-validation of the JSORRAT–II in Iowa. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 28(6), 534–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214548074
- Rasmussen, L. A. L. (2017). Comparing predictive validity of JSORRAT-II and MEGA♪\with sexually abusive youth in long-term residential custody. International Journal of Offender Rehabilitation and Comparative Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X17726550
- Rich, P. (2017, April 2). Juvenile risk assessment tool (J-RAT), version 4.July 2, 2017 http://www.philrich.net/risk-assessment-instruments.html
- Righthand, S., Prentky, R., Knight, R., Carpenter, E., Hecker, J. E., & Nangle, D. (2005). Factor analysis and validation of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol (J-SOAP). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320501700103
- Righthand, S., Worling, J. R., Prentky, R. A., & Kang, T. (2020). Youth needs and progress scale and user guide. Authors.
- Rojas, E. Y., & Olver, M. E. (2020). Validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale–Youth Sexual Offense Version. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 32(7), 826-849. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063219858064
- Viljoen, J. L., Mordell, S., & Beneteau, J. L. (2012). Prediction of adolescent sexual reoffending: A meta-analysis of the J-SOAP-II, ERASOR, J-SORRAT-II, and Static-99. Law and Human Behavior, 36(5), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093938
- Viljoen, J. L., Scalora, M., Cuadra, L., Bader, S., Chavez, V., Ullman, D., & Lawrence, L. (2008). Assessing risk for violence in adolescents who have sexually offended: A comparison of the J-SOAP-II, JSORRAT-II, and SAVRY. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854807307521
- Vitacco, M. J., Caldwell, M., Ryba, N. L., Melesky, A., & Kurus, S. J. (2009). Assessing risk in adolescent sexual offenders: Recommendations for clinical practice. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27(6), 929–940. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.909
- Wanamaker, K. A., Jones, N. J., & Brown, S. L. (2018). Strengths-based assessments for use with forensic populations: A critical review. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 17(2), 202–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2018.1451414
- Worling, J. R. (2017, June 14). PROFESOR: Protective + risk observations for eliminating sexual offense recidivism. June 19, 2017 http://wwwprofesor.ca
- Worling, J. R. (2004). The Estimate of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR): Preliminary psychometric data. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16(3), 235–254. https://doi.org/1079-0632/04/0700-0235/0
- Worling, J. R. (2020a, October). Literature utilized in the development and continuing support of the PROFESOR. Retrieved November 16, 2020 from: https://www.profesor.ca/downloads.html
- Worling, J. R. (2020b). PROFESOR: Protective + risk observations for eliminating sexual offense recidivism: User Guide 1.0. November 16, 2020 https://www.profesor.ca/downloads.html
- Worling, J. R., Bookalam, D., & Litteljohn, A. (2012). Prospective validity of the Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24(3), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063211407080
- Worling, J. R., & Curwen, T. 2001, February. The ERASOR: Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (Version 2.0) Sexual Abuse Family Education and Treatment (SAFE-T) Program, Thistletown Regional Center for Children and Adolescents, Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services.