784
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Subgroup analysis based on structured mixed-effects models for longitudinal data

& ORCID Icon
Pages 607-622 | Received 18 Mar 2019, Accepted 20 Dec 2019, Published online: 04 Mar 2020

References

  • Altstein, L. L., G. Li, and R. M. Elashoff. 2011. A method to estimate treatment efficacy among latent subgroups of a randomized clinical trial. Statistics in Medicine 30 (7):709–717. doi:10.1002/sim.v30.7.
  • Berger, J. O., X. Wang, and L. Shen. 2014. A Bayesian approach to subgroup identification. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 24 (1):110–129. doi:10.1080/10543406.2013.856026.
  • Cacho, A., W. Yao, and X. Cui. 2018. Base-calling using a random effects mixture model on next-generation sequencing data. Statistics in Biosciences 10:3–19. doi:10.1007/s12561-017-9190-3.
  • Cai, T., L. Tian, P. H. Wong, and L. J. Wei. 2011. Analysis of randomized comparative clinical trial data for personalized treatment selections. Biostatistics 12 (2):270–282. doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxq060.
  • Celeux, G., O. Martin, and C. Lavergne. 2005. Mixture of linear mixed models for clustering gene expression profiles from repeated microarray experiments. Statistical Modelling 5:1–25. doi:10.1191/1471082X05st096oa.
  • Fan, A., R. Song, and W. Lu. 2017. Change-plane analysis for subgroup detection and sample size calculation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 112 (518):769–778. doi:10.1080/01621459.2016.1166115.
  • Foster, J. C., J. M. Taylor, and S. J. Ruberg. 2011. Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data. Statistics in Medicine 30 (24):2867–2880. doi:10.1002/sim.4322.
  • Fruhwirth-Schnatter, S. 2006. Finite mixture and markov switching models. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Hall, D. B., and L. Wang. 2005. Two-component mixtures of generalized linear mixed effects models for cluster correlated data. Statistical Modelling 5:21–37. doi:10.1191/1471082X05st090oa.
  • Hammer, S. M., K. E. Squires, M. D. Hughes, J. M. Grimes, L. M. Demeter, J. S. Currier, J. J. Eron, J. E. Feinberg, H. H. Balfour, L. R. Deyton et al. 1997. A controlled trial of two nucleoside analogues plus indinavir in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection and CD4 cell counts of 200 per cubic millimeter or less. The New England Journal of Medicine. 337(11):725–733. doi:10.1056/NEJM199709113371101.
  • Hu, J., W. L. Leite, and M. Gao. 2017. An evaluation of the use of covariates to assist in class enumeration in linear growth mixture modeling. Behavior Research Methods 49:1179–1190. doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0778-1.
  • Huang, D., M.-L. Brecht, M. Hara, and Y.-I. Hser. 2010. Influences of covariates on growth mixture modeling. Journal of Drug Issues 40:173–194. doi:10.1177/002204261004000110.
  • Jordan, M. I., and R. A. Jacobs. 1994. Hierarchical mixtures of experts and the EM algorithm. Neural Computation 6 (2):181–214. doi:10.1162/neco.1994.6.2.181.
  • Komarek, A., B. E. Hansen, E. M. Kuiper, H. R. van Buuren, and E. Lesaffre. 2010. Discriminant analysis using a multivariate linear mixed model with a normal mixture in the random effects distribution. Statistics in Medicine 29:3267–3283. doi:10.1002/sim.3849.
  • Li, M., and J. R. Harring. 2017. Investigating approaches to estimating covariate effects in growth mixture modeling: A simulation study. Educational and Psychological Measurement 77:766–791. doi:10.1177/0013164416653789.
  • Liang, K. Y., and S. L. Zeger. 1986. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73:13–22. doi:10.1093/biomet/73.1.13.
  • Lin, H., B. W. Turnbull, C. E. McCulloch, and E. H. Slate. 2002. Latent class models for joint analysis of longitudinal biomarker and event process data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 97 (457):53–65. doi:10.1198/016214502753479220.
  • Lindsay, B. G. 1995. Mixture models: theory, geometry and applications. . Hayward, CA: Institute of Mathematical Statistics.
  • Lipkovich, I., A. Dmitrienko, J. Denne, and G. Enas. 2011. Subgroup identification based on differential effect search – A recursive partitioning method for establishing response to treatment in patient subpopulations. Statistics in Medicine 30 (21):2601–2621. doi:10.1002/sim.4289.
  • Louis, T. A. 1982. Finding the observed information matrix when using the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B: Statistical Methodology 44 (2):226–233.
  • Lu, X., and Y. Huang. 2014. Bayesian analysis of nonlinear mixed-effects mixture models for longitudinal data with heterogeneity and skewness. Statistics in Medicine 33:2830–2849. doi:10.1002/sim.6136.
  • Muthen, B., C. H. Brown, K. Masyn, B. Jo, S.-T. Khoo, -C.-C. Yang, C.-P. Wang, S. G. Kellam, J. B. Carlin, and J. Liao. 2002. General growth mixture modeling for randomized preventive interventions. Biostatistics 3:459–475. doi:10.1093/biostatistics/3.4.459.
  • Muthen, B., and T. Asparouhov. 2009. Multilevel regression mixture analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A: Statistics in Society 172 (3):639–657. doi:10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00589.x.
  • Ng, S. K., G. J. McLachlan, K. Wang, L. B. Jones, and S. Ng. 2006. A mixture model with random-effects components for clustering correlated gene-expression profiles. Bioinformatics 22 (14):1745–1752. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl165.
  • Nylund-Gibson, K., and K. E. Masyn. 2016. Covariates and mixture modeling: Results of a simulation study exploring the impact of misspecified effects on class enumeration. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 23:782–797. doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1221313.
  • Proust-Lima, C., J.-F. Dartigues, and H. Jacqmin-Gaddaa. 2016. Joint modeling of repeated multivariate cognitive measures and competing risks of dementia and death: A latent process and latent class approach. Statistics in Medicine 35:382–398. doi:10.1002/sim.v35.3.
  • Proust-Lima, C., V. Philipps, and B. Liquet. 2017. Estimation of extended mixed models using latent classes and latent processes: The R package LCMM. Journal of Statistical Software 78:1–56. doi:10.18637/jss.v078.i02.
  • Shen, J., and X. He. 2015. Inference for subgroup analysis with a structured logistic-normal mixture model. Journal of the American Statistical Association 110 (509):303–312. doi:10.1080/01621459.2014.894763.
  • Shen, J., Y. Wang, and X. He. 2017. Penalized likelihood for logistic-normal mixture models with unequal variances. Statistica Sinica 27:711–731.
  • Song, Y., and G. Y. Chi. 2007. A method for testing a pre-specified subgroup in clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine 26 (19):3535–3549. doi:10.1002/sim.2825.
  • Su, X., C. L. Tsai, H. Wang, D. M. Nickerson, and B. Li. 2009. Subgroup analysis via recursive partitioning. Journal of Machine Learning Research 10:141–158.
  • Tang, X., and A. Qu. 2016. Mixture modeling for longitudinal data. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 25:1117–1137. doi:10.1080/10618600.2015.1092979.
  • Turner, T. R. 2000. Estimating the propagation rate of a viral infection of potato plants via mixtures of regressions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C: Applied Statistics 49:371–384. doi:10.1111/1467-9876.00198.
  • Verbeke, G., and E. Lesaffre. 1996. A linear mixed-effects model with heterogeneity in the random-effects population. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 (433):217–221. doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10476679.
  • Wu, R., M. Zheng, and W. Yu. 2016. Subgroup analysis with time-to-event data under a logistic-cox mixture model. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 43 (3):863–878. doi:10.1111/sjos.v43.3.
  • Xu, W., and D. Hedeker. 2001. A random-effects mixture model for classifying treatment response in longitudinal clinical trials. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 11:253–273. doi:10.1081/BIP-120008848.
  • Yuksel, S. E., J. N. Wilson, and P. D. Gader. 2012. Twenty years of mixture of experts. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 23 (8):1177–1193. doi:10.1109/TNNLS.2012.2200299.
  • Zhao, L., L. Tian, T. Cai, B. Claggett, and L. J. Wei. 2013. Effectively selecting a target population for a future comparative study. Journal of the American Statistical Association 108 (502):527–539. doi:10.1080/01621459.2013.770705.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.