Nonmarket Benefits of Reducing Environmental Effects of Potential Wildfires in Beetle-Killed Trees: A Contingent Valuation Study

REFERENCES

• Alberini, A., & Kahn, J. (2006). Handbook on contingent valuation. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, K. J. (2003). Contingent valuation in practice. In P. A. Champ, T. C. Brown, & K. J. Boyle (Eds.), A primer on nonmarket valuation (pp. 111–169). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, R., & Groves, T. (2007). Incentive and informational properties of preference questions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37, 181–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, R. T., & Louviere, J. J. (2011). A common nomenclature for stated preference elicitation approaches. Environmental and Resource Economics, 49(4), 539–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champ, P. A., Brown, T. C., & Boyle, K. J. ( Eds). (2003). A primer on nonmarket valuation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, P. A., & Hausman, J. A. (1994). Contingent valuation: Is some number better than none? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 45–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D., & Sallant, P. (1994). How to conduct your own survey. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, A. M., III. (1993). The measurement of environmental and resource values. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Haab, T. C., & McConnell, K, E. (2002). Valuing environmental and natural resources: The econometrics of non-market valuation (pp. 59–79). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, J. (2012). Contingent valuation: From dubious to hopeless. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(4), 43–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heberlein, T. A., & Baumgartner, R. (1978). Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature. American Sociological Review, 43(4), 447–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffery, S., Verheijen, F. G. A., van der Velde, M., & Bastos, A. C. (2011). A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 144(1), 175–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling, C. L., Phaneuf, D. J., & Zhao, J. (2012). From Exxon to BP: Has some number become better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(4), 3–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krutilla, J. V. (1967). Conservation reconsidered. American Economic Review, 57(4), 777–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krutilla, J. V., & Fisher, A. C. (1975). The economics of natural environments. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laird, D. A. (2008). The charcoal vision: A win-win-win scenario for simultaneously producing bioenergy, permanently sequestrating carbon, while improving soil and water quality. Agronomy Journal, 100, 178–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, J. (2007). Bioenergy in the black. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environments, 5(7), 381–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, J., Gaunt, J., & Rondon, M. (2006). Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems—A review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 11, 403–427.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, J., & Joseph, S. (Eds.). (2009a). Biochar for environmental management: Science and technology. Washington, DC: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, J., & Joseph, S. (2009b). Biochar for environmental management: An introduction. In J. Lehmann & S. Joseph (Eds.), Biochar for environmental management: Science and technology (pp. 1–12). Washington, DC: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Loomis, J. (2014). Strategies for overcoming hypothetical bias in stated preference surveys. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 39(1), 34–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis, J., & Gonzalez-Caban, A. (2009). Forest service use of nonmarket valuation in fire economics: Past, present, and future. Journal of Forestry, 108(8), 389–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis, J., & Walsh, R. (1997). Recreation economic decisions: Comparing benefits and costs (2nd ed.). State College, PA: Venture.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, N. (2012, June 20). High Park fire follows in pine beetle’s tracks. Retrieved from http://www.eenews.net/stories/1059966168
   Google Scholar
• McCollum, D. W., Peterson, G. L., & Swanson, C. S. (1992). A manager’s guide to the valuation of nonmarket resources: What do you really want to know? In G. L. Peterson, C. S. Swanson, D. W. Mccollum, & M. H. Thomas (Eds.), Valuing wildlife resources in Alaska (pp. 25–52). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, S., Glaser, B., & Quicker, P. (2011). Technical, economical, and climate-related aspects of biochar production technologies: A literature review. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(22), 9473–9483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, K. (2012, November 20). Colorado wildfire: High Park fire now 100 percent contained. Retrieved from http://www.denverpost.com/wildfires/ci_20979988/colorado-wildfire-all-high-park-evacuations-lifted-by
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. C., & Carson, R. T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. New York, NY: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• National Interagency Fire Center. (2012). National report of wildland fires and acres burned by state. Retrieved from http://www.predictiveservices.nifc.gov/intelligence/2012_statssumm/fires_acres.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Portney, P. R. (1994). The contingent valuation debate: Why economists should care. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 3–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racine, J. (2008). Nonparametric econometrics: A primer. Foundations and Trends® in Econometrics, 3(1), 1–88.
   Google Scholar
• Sohi, S., Krull, E., Lopez-Capel, E., & Bol, R. (2010). A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. Advances in Agronomy, 105, 47–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talberth, J., Berrens, R. P., McKee, M., & Jones, M. (2006). Averting and insurance decisions in the wildland-urban interface: Implications of survey and experimental data for wildfire risk reduction policy. Contemporary Economic Policy, 24(2), 203–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service. (2013). Bark beetles: Summary for 2000-2012, western U.S. Washington DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Forest Health Protection. (2012). Bark beetles, they’re back!! Are your trees at risk? Retrieved from http://beetles.mt.gov/educational/pdf/treesatrisk.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vossler, C., Doyon, M., & Rondeau, D. (2012). Truth in consequentiality: Theory and field evidence on discrete choice experiments. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 4, 145–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vossler, C., & Kerkvliet, J. (2003). A criterion validity test of the contingent valuation method: Comparing hypothetical and actual voting behavior for a public referendum. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 631–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vossler, C., & Watson, S. (2013). Understanding the consequences of consequentiality: Testing the validity of stated preferences in the field. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 86, 137–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, S., Rideout, D., Loomis, J., & Reich. R. (2007). Comparing the value of fuel treatment options in northern Colorado’s urban and wildland–urban interface areas. Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 694–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar