Coarse root biomass and architecture of hybrid aspen ‘Crandon’ (Populus alba L. × P. grandidenta Michx.) grown in an agroforestry system in central Iowa, USA

References

• Bolte, A., Rahmann, T., Kuhr, M., Pogoda, P., Murach, D., & Gadow, K. V. (2004). Relationships between tree dimension and coarse root biomass in mixed stands of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). Plant and Soil, 264, 1–11. doi:10.1023/B:PLSO.0000047777.23344.a3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brassard, B. W., Chen, H. Y. H., & Bergeron, Y. (2009). Influence of environmental variability on root dynamics in northern forests. Critical Reviews in Plant Science, 28, 179–197. doi:10.1080/07352680902776572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, M. D., Friend, A. L., & Kern, C. C. (2004). Carbon allocation and nitrogen acquisition in a developing Populus deltoides plantation. Tree Physiology, 24, 1347–1357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutts, M. P. (1987). Developmental processes in tree root systems. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 17, 761–767. doi:10.1139/x87-122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. R., & Coleman, M. D. (2005). Forest production responses to irrigation and fertilization are not explained by shifts in allocation. Forest Ecology and Management, 208, 137–152. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curt, T., Coll, L., Prévosto, B., Balandier, P., & Kunstler, G. (2005). Plasticity in growth, biomass allocation and root morphology in beech seedlings as induced by irradiance and herbaceous competition. Annals of Forest Science, 62, 51–60. doi:10.1051/forest:2004092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danjon, F., & Reubens, B. (2008). Assessing and analyzing 3D architecture of woody root systems, a review of methods and applications in tree and soil stability, resource acquisition and allocation. Plant and Soil, 303, 1–34. doi:10.1007/s11104-007-9470-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danjon, F., Sinoquet, H., Godin, C., Colin, F., & Drexhage, M. (1999). Characterisation of structural tree root architecture using 3D digitizing and AMAPmod software. Plant and Soil, 211, 241–258. doi:10.1023/A:1004680824612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DesRochers, A., & Lieffers, V. J. (2001). Root biomass of regenerating aspen (Populus tremuloides) stands of different densities in Alberta. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31, 1012–1018. doi:10.1139/x01-037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Iorio, A., Lassere, B., Scippa, G. S., & Chiatante, D. (2005). Root system architecture of Quercus pubescens trees growing on different sloping conditions. Annals of Botany, 95, 351–361. doi:10.1093/aob/mci033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, G. B., McIvor, I. R., & Lloyd-West, C. M. (2016). Early root development of field-grown poplar: Effects of planting material and genotype. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 46, 1. doi:10.1186/s40490-015-0057-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, G. B., McIvor, I. R., Potter, J. F., & Foote, L. G. (2010). Root distribution of poplar at varying densities on pastoral hill country. Plant and Soil, 333, 147–161. doi:10.1007/s11104-010-0331-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drexhage, M., Chauvière, M., Colin, F., & Nielsen, C. N. N. (1999). Development of structural root architecture and allometry of Quercus petraea. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 29, 600–608. doi:10.1139/x99-027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortier, J., Truax, B., Gagnon, D., & Lambert, F. (2013). Root biomass and soil carbon distribution in hybrid poplar riparian buffers, herbaceous riparian buffers and natural riparian woodlots on farmland. SpringerPlus, 2, 539. doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-539
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friend, A. L., Scarascia-Mugnozza, G., Isebrands, J. G., & Heilman, P. E. (1991). Quantification of two-year-old hybrid poplar root systems: Morphology, biomass, and 14C distribution. Tree Physiology, 8, 109–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatherum, G. E., Gordon, J. C., & Broerman, B. F. S. (1967). Effects of clone and light intensity on photosynthesis, respiration and growth of aspen-poplar hybrids. Silvae Genetica, 16(4), 128–132.
   Google Scholar
• Goerndt, M. E., & Mize, C. (2008). Short-rotation woody biomass as a crop on marginal lands in Iowa. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 25, 82–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haissig, B. E., & Davis, T. D. (1994). A historical evaluation of adventitious rooting research to 1993. In T. D. Davis & B. E. Haissig (Eds.), Biology of adventitious root formation (pp. 275–331). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R. B., Hart, E. R., & Peszlen, I. (2001). Modifying Populus environmental responses: Impacts on wood quantity and quality. In N. Morohoshi & A. Komamine (Eds.), Molecular breeding of woody plants (pp. 229–238). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Headlee, W. L. (2012). Productivity and biometry of hybrid poplars with respect to establishment, regeneration, regional modeling, and utilization of bio-energy byproducts. PhD dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA. 140 p.
   Google Scholar
• Headlee, W. L., Hall, R. B., & Zalesny, R. S. (2013a). Establishment of alleycropped hybrid aspen “Crandon” in central Iowa, USA: Effects of topographic position and fertilizer rate on aboveground biomass production and allocation. Sustainability, 5, 2874–2886. doi:10.3390/su5072874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Headlee, W. L., Zalesny, R. S., Hall, R. B., Bauer, E. O., Bender, B., Birr, B. A., … Wiese, A. H. (2013b). Specific gravity of hybrid poplars in the north-central region, USA: Within-tree variability and site × genotype effects. Forests, 4, 251–269. doi:10.3390/f4020251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, P. E., Ekuan, G., & Fogle, D. B. (1994). First-order root development from cuttings of Populus trichocarpa × Populus deltoides hybrids. Tree Physiology, 14, 911–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, J. S., Pregitzer, K. S., & Zak, D. R. (1999). Clonal variation in above- and below-ground growth responses of Populus tremuloides Michaux: Influence of soil warming and nutrient availability. Plant and Soil, 217, 119–130. doi:10.1023/A:1004560311563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littell, R. C., Stroup, W. W., & Freund, R. J. (2002). SAS® for linear models (4th ed., pp. 466). Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• McIvor, I. R., Douglas, G. B., & Benavides, R. (2009). Coarse root growth of Veronese poplar trees varies with position on an erodible slope in New Zealand. Agroforestry Systems, 76, 251–264. doi:10.1007/s10457-009-9209-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mou, P., Mitchell, R. J., & Jones, R. H. (1997). Root distribution of two tree species under a heterogeneous nutrient environment. Journal of Applied Ecology, 34, 645–656. doi:10.2307/2404913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygren, P., Lu, M., & Ozier-Lafontaine, H. (2009). Effects of turnover and internal variability of tree root systems on modeling coarse root architecture: Comparing simulations for young Populus deltoides with field data. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 39, 97–108. doi:10.1139/X08-158
   Google Scholar
• Ontl, T. A., Hofmockel, K. S., Cambardella, C. A., Schulte, L. A., & Kolka, R. K. (2013). Topographic and soil influences on root productivity of three bioenergy cropping systems. New Phytologist, 199, 727–737. doi:10.1111/nph.12302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pregitzer, K. S., & Friend, A. L. (1996). The structure and function of Populus root systems. In R. F. Stettler, H. D. Bradshaw Jr., P. E. Heilman, & T. M. Hinckley (Eds.), Biology of populus and its implications for management and conservation (pp. 331–354). Ottawa, Canada: NRC Res Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reubens, B., Poesen, J., Danjon, F., Geudens, G., & Muys, B. (2007). The role of fine and coarse roots in shallow slope stability and soil erosion control with a focus on root system architecture: A review. Trees, 21, 385–402. doi:10.1007/s00468-007-0132-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas, E., Ozier-Lafontaine, H., & Nygren, P. (2004). A fractal root model applied for estimating the root biomass and architecture in two tropical legume tree species. Annals of Forest Science, 61, 337–345. doi:10.1051/forest:2004027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinozaki, K., Yoda, K., Hozumi, K., & Kira, T. (1964). A quantitative analysis of plant form – The pipe model theory. I. Basic analysis. Japanese Journal of Ecology, 14, 97–105.
   Google Scholar
• Thelemann, R., Johnson, G., Sheaffer, C., Banerjee, S., Cai, H., & Wyse, D. (2010). The effect of landscape position on biomass crop yield. Agronomy Journal, 102, 513–522. doi:10.2134/agronj2009.0058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiese, A. H., Riemenschneider, D. E., & Zalesny, R. S., Jr. (2005). An inexpensive rhizotron design for two-dimensional, horizontal root growth measurements. Tree Planters’ Notes, 51, 40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. M., Heaton, E. A., Schulte, L. A., Gunther, T. P., Hall, R. B., Headlee, W. L., … Boersma, N. N. (2014). Establishment and short-term productivity of annual and perennial bioenergy crops across a landscape gradient. BioEnergy Research, 7, 885–898. doi:10.1007/s12155-014-9409-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wullschleger, S. D., Yin, T. M., DiFazio, S. P., Tschaplinski, T. J., Gunter, L. E., Davis, M. F., & Tuskan, G. A. (2005). Phenotypic variation in growth and biomass distribution for two advanced-generation pedigrees of hybrid poplar. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35, 1779–1789. doi:10.1139/x05-101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalesny, R. S., Jr., Stanturf, J. A., Gardiner, E. S., Perdue, J. H., Young, T. M., Coyle, D. R., … Hass, A. (2016). Ecosystem services of woody crop production systems. BioEnergy Research, 9(2), 465–491. doi:10.1007/s12155-016-9737-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalesny, R. S., Jr., Riemenschneider, D. E., & Hall, R. B. (2005). Early rooting of dormant hardwood cuttings of Populus: Analysis of quantitative genetics and genotype × environment interactions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35, 918–929. doi:10.1139/x05-018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar