The Impact of Invasive Buckthorn on Ecosystem Services and its Potential for Bioenergy Production: A review

References

• Alakoski, E., Jämsén, M., Agar, D., Tampio, E., & Wihersaari, M. (2016). From wood pellets to wood chips, risks of degradation and emissions from the storage of woody biomass - A short review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54(376–383), 376–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.021
   Google Scholar
• An act concerning fines for banned invasive plants., Pub. L. No. Substitute Senate Bill No. 547 Public Act No. 04-203 (2004). https://www.cga.ct.gov/2004/act/Pa/2004PA-00203-R00SB-00547-PA.htm
   Google Scholar
• Ayer, N. W., & Dias, G. (2018). Supplying renewable energy for Canadian cement production: Life cycle assessment of bioenergy from forest harvest residues using mobile fast pyrolysis units. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, P. (2018). Biomass Gasification, Pyrolysis and Torrefaction: Practical Design and Theory. Joc Hayton. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en‎&id=BYM2DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Biomass+gasification,+pyrolysis+and+torrefaction+:+Practical+design+and+theory+(Second+ed.,+Gale+virtual+reference+library).&ots=nInxf7uIqQ&sig=zc0HD9OLFcf9a6lkXt4wHrGNS6E#v=onepage&q&f=false
   Google Scholar
• Bronson, D., Edge, G., Hardin, C., Herrick, S., & Knoot, T. (2014). Wisconsin’s Forestland Woody Biomass Harvesting Guidelines PUB-FR-435-2014. WI DNR Division of Forestry and Wisconsin Council on Forestrty; Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Buchholz, T., & Volk, T. A. (2011). Improving the Profitability of Willow Crops-Identifying Opportunities with a Crop Budget Model. Bioenergy Research, 4(2), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-010-9103-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles-Dominique, T., Edelin, C., Brisson, J., & Bouchard, A. (2012). Architectural strategies of Rhamnus cathartica (Rhamnaceae) in relation to canopy openness. Botany, 90(10), 976–989. https://doi.org/10.1139/B2012-069
   Google Scholar
• Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Braat, L., Kubiszewski, I., Fioramonti, L., Sutton, P., Farber, S., & Grasso, M. (2017). Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosystem Services, 28, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapter 317 Weeds. Iowa § 317.1A et seq. (2021).
   Google Scholar
• D’Amato, D., Rekola, M., Li, N., & Toppinen, A. (2016). Monetary valuation of forest ecosystem services in China: A literature review and identification of future research needs. Ecological Economics, 121,75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.009
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, I. A., Bennett, B. M., Burrows, L. E., Nuñez, M. A., Peltzer, D. A., Porté, A., Richardson, D. M., Rejmánek, M., Rundel, P. W., & van Wilgen, B. W. (2014). Conflicting values: Ecosystem services and invasive tree management. Biological Invasions, 16(3), 705–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0609-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds, W. K., Wilson, K. C., Rehmeier, R. L., Knight, G. L., Wiggam, S., Falke, J. A., Dalgleish, H. J., & Bertrand, K. N. (2008). Comparing ecosystem goods and services provided by restored and native lands. BioScience, 58(9), 837–845. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duraiappah, A. K., Naeem, S., Agardy, T., Ash, N. J., Cooper, H. D., Díaz, S., Faith, D. P., Mace, G., McNeely, J. A., Mooney, H. A., Alfred, A., Oteng-Yeboah, H. M. P., Polasky, S., Prip, C., Reid, W. V., Samper, C., Schei, P. J., Scholes, R., Schutyser, F., & Jaarsve, A. V. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Biodiversity synthesis; a report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press, Washington D.C. https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/340442
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C. W. (2016). Invasive Plant Species Regulated by the Illinois Exotic Weed Act. University of Illinois Extension.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, M. E., & Peart, D. R. (2004). Impact of the invasive shrub glossy buckthorn (Rhamnus frangula L.) on juvenile recruitment by canopy trees. Forest Ecology and Management, 194(1–3), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautam, S., LeBel, L., & Carle, M. A. (2017). Supply chain model to assess the feasibility of incorporating a terminal between forests and biorefineries. Applied Energy, 198, 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautam, S., Pulkki, R., Shahi, C., & Leitch, M. (2010). Economic and energy efficiency of salvaging biomass from wildfire burnt areas for bioenergy production in northwestern Ontario: A case study. Biomass and Bioenergy, 34(11), 1562–1572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilliam, F. S. (2006). Response of the herbaceous layer of forest ecosystems to excess nitrogen deposition. Journal of Ecology, 94(6), 1176–1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01155.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamelin, C., Truax, B., & Gagnon, D. (2016). Invasive glossy buckthorn impedes growth of red oak and sugar maple under-planted in a mature hybrid poplar plantation. New Forests, 47(6), 897–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-016-9551-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanzelka, N. C., Bolding, M. C., Sullivan, J., & Barrett, S. M. (2016). Productivity and costs of utilizing small-diameter stems in a biomass-only harvest. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 27(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2015.1135615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington, R. A., Brown, B. J., & Reich, P. B. (1989). Ecophysiology of exotic and native shrubs in Southern Wisconsin - Relationship of leaf characteristics, resource availability, and phenology to seasonal patterns of carbon gain. Oecologia, 80(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbing, F., Cornils, N., Stuhldreher, G., & Fartmann, T. (2015). Populations of a shrub-feeding butterfly thrive after introduction of restorative shrub cutting on formerly abandoned calcareous grassland. Journal of Insect Conservation, 19(3), 457–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-015-9766-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heneghan, L., Fatemi, F., Umek, L., Grady, K., Fagen, K., & Workman, M. (2006). The invasive shrub European buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica, L.) alters soil properties in Midwestern U.S. woodlands. Applied Soil Ecology, 32(1), 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heneghan, L., Rauschenberg, C., Fatemi, F., & Workman, M. (2004). European buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) and its effects on some ecosystem properties in an urban woodland. Ecological Restoration, 22(4), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.3368/er.22.4.275
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Morcillo, M., Plieninger, T., & Bieling, C. (2013). An empirical review of cultural ecosystem service indicators. Ecological Indicators, 29, 434–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.01.013
   Google Scholar
• Iannone, B. V., . I., Umek, L. G., Heneghan, L., & Wise, D. H. (2013). Amending soil with mulched European buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) does not reduce reinvasion. Ecological Restoration, 31(3), 264–273. https://doi.org/10.3368/er.31.3.264
   Google Scholar
• Indiana Invasive Species Council. (2020). Official IISC Invasive Plant List. https://www.entm.purdue.edu/iisc/invasiveplants.html CHAPTER 317 Weeds, (2021)
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D., Anderson, N. M. L., & Chung, W. (2015). Financial performance of a mobile pyrolysis system used to produce biochar from sawmill residues. Forest Products Journal, 65(5–6), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.13073/FPJ-D-14-00052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klionsky, S. M., Amatangelo, K. L., & Waller, D. M. (2011). Above- and belowground impacts of European buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) on four native forbs. Restoration Ecology, 19(6), 728–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00727.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, K. S., Kurylo, J. S., Endress, A. G., Stewart, J. R., & Reich, P. B. (2007). Ecology and ecosystem impacts of common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica): A review. Biological Invasions, 9(8), 925–937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-007-9091-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krawchuk, M. A., Meigs, G. W., Cartwright, J. M., Coop, J. D., Davis, R., Holz, A., Kolden, C., & Meddens, A. J. H. (2020). Disturbance refugia within mosaics of forest fire, drought, and insect outbreaks. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 18(5), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krigstin, S., Wetzel, S., Mabee, W., & Stadnyk, S. (2016). Can woody biomass support a pellet industry in southeastern Ontario: A case study. Forestry Chronicle, 92(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc2016-038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurylo, J., & Endress, A. G. (2012). Rhamnus cathartica: Notes on its early history in North America. Northeastern Naturalist, 19(4), 601–610. https://doi.org/10.1656/045.019.0405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurylo, J. S., Knight, K. S., Stewart, J. R., & Endress, A. G. (2007). Rhamnus cathartica: Native and naturalized distribution and habitat preferences. The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 134(3), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.3159/1095-5674(2007)134[420:rcnand]2.0.co;2
   Google Scholar
• Lacey Act. Publ. L. No. 18 USC 42-43, 16 USC 3371-3378.
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, D. J., Steffen, J. F., Gentile, R. M., & Zirbel, C. R. (2014). Ecosystem changes following restoration of a buckthorn-invaded woodland. Restoration Ecology, 22(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. D., Eisenhaure, S. E., & Gaudreau, I. P. (2017). Pre-logging treatment of invasive glossy buckthorn (Frangula alnus Mill.) promotes regeneration of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.). Forests, 8(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8010016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilly, M. E. (2000). An Analysis of Bluff Prairie Size in Great River Bluffs State Park from 1936 to 1996. Saint Mary's University of Minnesota Central Services Press. Winona. MN.
   Google Scholar
• Maine Department of Agriculture, C. and F. (2021). Invasive Plants. https://www.maine.gov/dacf/php/horticulture/invasiveplants.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Mascaro, J., & Schnitzer, S. A. (2011). Dominance by the introduced tree Rhamnus cathartica (common buckthorn) may limit aboveground carbon storage in southern Wisconsin forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 261(3), 545–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mass.gov. (2021). Massachusetts Prohibited Plant List. https://www.mass.gov/service-details/massachusetts-prohibited-plant-list
   Google Scholar
• Michigan Legislator. (2021). NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT (EXCERPT). http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(yivizekamf0j3ldytnu4ni3n))/mileg.aspx?page=GetObject&objectname=mcl-324-41301
   Google Scholar
• Minnesota Department of Agriculture. (2020). Minnesota Noxious Weed List. https://www.mda.state.mn.us/plants-insects/minnesota-noxious-weed-list
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-Lopez, M., Alarcón-Herrera, M. T., & Martin-Dominguez, I. R. (2017). Feasibility of pelletizing forest residues in northern Mexico. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 8(3), 923–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9623-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemec, K. T., Allen, C. R., Alai, A., Clements, G., Kessler, A. C., Kinsell, T., Major, A., & Stephen, B. J. (2011). Woody invasions of urban trails and the changing face of urban forests in the Great Plains, USA. The American Midland Naturalist, 165(2), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031-165.2.241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Hampshire Department of Agriculture, M. and F. (2014). Invasive Plants. https://www.agriculture.nh.gov/divisions/plant-industry/invasive-plants.htm
   Google Scholar
• Nowak, D. J., Hoehn, R. E., Bodine, A. R., Greenfield, E. J., & O’Neil-Dunne, J. (2016). Urban forest structure, ecosystem services and change in Syracuse, NY. Urban Ecosystems, 19(4), 1455–1477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-013-0326-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NYS DEC. (2014). Invasive Plants. http://www.dec.ny.gov/animals/63402.html
   Google Scholar
• Ohio Laws and Administrative Rules. (2018, January 7). Rule 901: 5-30-01. https://codes.ohio.gov/ohio-administrative-code/rule-901:5-30-01
   Google Scholar
• Pan, F., Han, H., Johnson, R. L., & Elliot, W. J. (2008). Production and cost of harvesting, processing, and transporting small-diameter (≤ 5 inches) trees for energy. Forest Products Journal, 58(5), 47–53. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A179736056/AONE?u=stevens&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid-b496a94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. (2021). Noxious, Invasive and Poisonous Plant Program. https://www.agriculture.pa.gov/Plants_Land_Water/PlantIndustry/NIPPP/Pages/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Picchio, R., Latterini, F., Venanzi, R., Stefanoni, W., Suardi, A., Tocci, D., & Pari, L. (2020). Pellet production from woody and non-woody feedstocks: A review on biomass quality evaluation. Energies, 13(11), 2937. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokofiev, S. (1936). Peter and the wolf [Song]. Op. 67. Trillenium Music Co.
   Google Scholar
• Ramage, M. H., Burridge, H., Busse-Wicher, M., Fereday, G., Reynolds, T., Shah, D. U., Wu, G., Yu, L., Fleming, P., Densley-Tingley, D., Allwood, J., Dupree, P., Linden, P. F., & Scherman, O. (2017). The wood from the trees: The use of timber in construction. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68(333–359), 333–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.107
   Google Scholar
• Sarwacinski, M. I., & Berg-Binder, M. C. (2017). Research Article: Relationships between plant community species richness, remnant area, and invasive leafy spurge cover in southeastern Minnesota bluff prairie habitats. BIOS, 88(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1893/BIOS-D-15-00012.1
   Google Scholar
• Savoie, P. D., Current, R. F. S., & Hébert, P. L. (2012). Harvest of natural shrubs with a Biobaler in various environments in Québec, Ontario and Minnesota. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 28(6), 795–801. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.42473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiess, P., & Krogstad, F. (2004). Chapter 10: Forest Harvest and Transportation. In Northcote, T.G. &Hartman G.F. Fishes and Forestry. Blackwell Science Ltd. DOI: 10.1002/9780470995242.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, K. A., & Whelan, C. J. (1999). Effects of exotic Lonicera and Rhamnus on songbird nest predation. Conservation Biology, 13(6), 1502–1506. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.99050.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spears, B., Ashling, C., & Lochner, M. (2019). Linking Habitat Restoration to Bioenergy in Oak Woodlands: Alimagnet Park (MN DNR & City of Burnsville). Great Lakes Silviculture Library. University of Minnesota. https://silvlib.cfans.umn.edu/content/linking-habitat-restoration-bioenergy-oak-woodlands-alimagnet-park-mn-dnr-city-burnsville
   Google Scholar
• Stihl. (n.d.). FS 450 - Professional Scrubcutter. Retrieved June 14, 2021, https://www.stihl.com.fj/STIHL-Products/Brushcutters/Brushcutters/223158-80158/FS-450.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Stokdyk, J. P., & Herrman, K. S. (2014). Short-term impacts of Frangula alnus litter on forest soil properties. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 225(6), 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-2000-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suess, Dr. (1971). The Lorax. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Toscano, G., Alfano, V., Scarfone, A., & Pari, L. (2018). Pelleting vineyard pruning at low cost with a mobile technology. Energies, 11(9), 2477. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11092477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyndall, J. C., Schulte, L. A., & Hall, R. B. (2011). Expanding the US cornbelt Biomass portfolio: Forester perceptions of the potential for woody biomass. Small-Scale Forestry, 10(3), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-010-9149-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USDA. (n.d.). Plants Database. Retrieved July 5, 2021, https://plants.sc.egov.usda.gov/home
   Google Scholar
• Vermont Agency of Agriculture, F. and M. (2021). Invasive & Noxious Weeds in Vermont. https://agriculture.vermont.gov/public-health-agricultural-resource-management-division/plant-health-and-pest-management/plant-2
   Google Scholar
• Vernon, M. E., Magle, S. B., Lehrer, E. W., & Bramble, J. E. (2014). Invasive European buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica L.) association with mammalian species distribution in natural areas of the Chicagoland Region, USA. Natural Areas Journal, 34(2), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.3375/043.034.0203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisconsin DNR. (n.d.). Invasive species rule – NR 40. Retrieved June 15, 2021, https://dnr.wisconsin.gov/topic/invasives/classification.html
   Google Scholar
• Zamora-Cristales, R., Sessions, J., Boston, K., & Murphy, G. (2015). Economic optimization of forest biomass processing and transport in the Pacific Northwest USA. Forest Science, 61(2), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.13-158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar