When Low Self-efficacy is Efficacious: Toward an Addicted-self Model of Cessation of Alcohol- and Drug-dependent Behavior

REFERENCES

• Anglin MD, Hser Y-I. Drug abuse treatment. In: Watson RR, ed. Drug and Alcohol Abuse Reviews. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press;1992:1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Egertson JA, Fox DM, Lushness AI, eds. Treating Drug Abuse Electively. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers of North America; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Garbutt JC, West SL, Carey TS, et al. Pharmacological treatment of alcohol dependence: a review of the evidence. JAMA. 1999;281:1318–1325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerstein DR, Harwood HJ, eds. Treating Drug Problems: A Study of the Evolution, Electiveness, and Financing of Public and Private Drug Treatment Systems. Vol 1. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard RL, Marsden ME, Rachal JV, et al. Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Electiveness. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Kleber HD. Treatment of drug dependence: what works. Int Rev Psychiatry. 1989;1:81–100.
   Google Scholar
• Kosten TR, McCance E. A review of pharmacotherapies for substance abuse. Am J Addict. 1996;5:S30–S37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLellan AT, Alterman AI, Metzger DS et al. Similarity of outcome predictors across opiate, cocaine, and alcohol treatments: role of treatment services. In: Marlatt GA, VandenBos GR, eds. Addictive Behaviors: Readings on Etiology,Prevention, andTreatment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson DD. Electiveness of drug abuse treatment: a review of research from field settings. In: Egertson JA, Fox DM, Leshner AI, eds. Treating Drug Abusers Electively. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Weddington WW. Use of pharmacologic agents in the treatment of addiction. Psychiatric Annals. 1992;22:425–429.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher BW, Battjes RJ. Introduction to the special issue: treatment processes in DATOS. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1999;57:81–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-e.cacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:191–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-e.cacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol. 1982;37:122–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-E.cacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Exercise of personal agency through the self-e.cacy mechanism. In: Shwarzer R, ed. Self-E.cacy: Thought Control of Action. Washington, DC: Hemisphere; 1992:355–394.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. On rectifying conceptual ecumenism. In: Maddux JE, ed. Self-E.cacy, Adaptation, and Adjustment: Theory, Research, and Application. New York: Plenum Press; 1995: 347–375.
   Google Scholar
• Marlatt GA, Gordon JR. Determinants of relapse: implications for the maintenance of behavior change. In: Davidson PO, Davidson SM, eds. Behavioral Medicine: Changing Health Lifestyles. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1980: 410–445.
   Google Scholar
• Marlatt GA, Gordon JR, eds. Relapse Prevention: Maintenance Strategies in the Treatment of Addictive Behaviors. New York: Guilford; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Shilman S, Wills TA, eds. Coping and Substance Use. Orlando, FL: Academic Press; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Goldbeck R, Myatt P, Aitchison T. End-of-treatment self-e.cacy: a predictor of abstinence. Addiction. 1997;92:313–324.
   Google Scholar
• McKay JR, Maisto SA, O’Farrell TJ. End-of-treatment self-e.cacy, aftercare, and drinking outcomes of alcoholic men. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1993;17:1078–1083.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly PM, Sees KL, Shopshire MS, et al. Self-e.cacy and illicit opioid use in a 180 day methadone detoxification treatment. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995;63:158–162.
   Google Scholar
• Rychtarik RG, Prue DM, Rapp SR, et al. Self-e.cacy, aftercare, and relapse in a treatment program for alcoholics. J Stud Alcohol. 1992;53:435–440.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens RS, Wertz JS, Rolman RA. Predictors of marijuana treatment outcomes: the role of self-e.cacy. J Subst Abuse. 1993;5:341–353.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burling TA, Reilly PM, Moltzen JO, et al. Self-e.cacy and relapse among inpatient drug and alcohol abusers: a predictor of outcome. J Stud Alcohol. 1989;50:354–360.
   Google Scholar
• LangenbucherJ,SulesundD,ChungT,etal.Illness severity and self-e.cacy as course predictors of DSM-IV alcohol dependence in a multisiteclinical sample.AddictBehav. 1996;21:543–553.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer JE, Sayer-Koeningsmark CP. Self-e.cacy, relapse and the possibility of post treatment denial as a stage in alcoholism. Alcohol Treat Quart. 1991;8:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Powell J, Dawe S, Richards D, et al. Can opiate addicts tell us about their relapse risk? Subjective predictors of clinical prognosis. Addict Behav. 1993;18:473–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon KE, Annis HM. Outcome and e.cacy expectancy in the prediction of post-treatment drinking behavior. Br JAddict. 1990;85:659–665.
   Google Scholar
• Feuerlein W. Is controlled drinking possible for the person who has been severely alcohol dependent? Making explicit what others were assuming. Br J Addict. 1987;82:844–845.
   Google Scholar
• Foreyt JP. The addictive disorders. In: Wilson GT, Franks CM, Kendall PC, et al., eds. Review of Behavior Therapy. Vol 1. New York: Guilford; 1987: 187–223.
   Google Scholar
• Foy DW, Nunn LB, Rychtarik FG. Broad-spectrum behavioral treatment for chronic alcoholics: elects of training controlled drinking skill. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1984;52:218–230.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galanter M. Consensual support for abstinence: an integral component of alcoholism treatment. Br J Addict. 1987;82:841–842.
   Google Scholar
• Gorski TT. Relapse prevention planning: a new recovery tool. Alcohol Health Res World. 1986;11:6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Helzer JE, Robins LN, Taylor JR, et al. The extent of long-term moderate drinking among alcoholics discharged from medical and psychiatric treatment facilities. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:1678–1682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendery ML, Maltzman IM, West LJ. Controlled drinking by alcoholics? New findings and a reevaluation of a major a.rmative study. Science. 1982;217:169–175.
   Google Scholar
• Rychtarik RG, Foy DW, Scott T, et al. Five- to six-year follow-up of broad-spectrum behavioral treatment for alcoholism: elects of training controlled drinking skill. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1987;55:106–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace J. Controlled drinking, treatment electiveness, and the disease model of addiction: a commentary on the ideological wishes of Stanton Peele. J Psychoactive Drugs. 1990;22:261–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitharthan T, Kavanagh DJ. Role of self-e.cacy in predicting outcomes from a programme for controlled drinking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1990;27:87–94.
   Google Scholar
• Emerick CD. A review of psychologically oriented treatment of alcoholism. Quart. J. Stud. on Alcohol. 1974;35:523–549.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller W, Hester R. The Addictive Behaviors: Treatment of Alcoholism, Drug Abuse, Smoking, and Obesity. New York: Pergamon Press; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, RL, Flynn PM, Craddock, SG, Fletcher BW. Relapse after drug treatment 2001. In: Tims M., Leukefeld CG, Platt JJ, eds. Relapse and Recovery in the Addictions. New Haven, Yale University Press; 2001:109–121.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan PE. Outcome of treatment for alcoholism: current data. Annals Behav Med. 1986;8:40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Sobell MB, Sobell LC. Controlled drinking after 25 years: how important was the great debate? Addiction. 1995;90:1149–1153.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorentine R, Gil-Rivas V, Hillhouse MP. Enhancing drug treatment: evaluation of the Los Angeles Target Cities Project (Years 4-5). Submitted to the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorentine R, Gil-Rivas V. The Client-Needs-Services-Outcomes Questionniare, Parts I and II. Available from the UCLA Drug Abuse Research Center, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorentine R, Hillhouse MP. Drug treatment electiveness and counselor empathy: exploring the cultural congruency hypothesis. J Drug Issues. 1999;29:59–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorentine R, Nakashima J, Anglin MD. Client engagement in treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1999;17:199–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annis HM. The Situational Confidence Questionnaire (SCQ-39). Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Miller PJ, Ross SM, Emmerson RY, et al. Self-e.cacy in alcoholics: clinical validation of the situational confidence questionnaire. Addict Beh. 1989; 14:217–224.
   Google Scholar
• Ball J. The reliability and validity of interview data from 59 narcotic drug addicts. American Journal of Sociology. 1967;72:650–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson RS, Stein S. Reliability of self-report of alcoholics. Behav Modif. 1983;6:107–119.
   Google Scholar
• Hser Y-I, Anglin MD, Chou CP. Reliability of retrospective self-report by narcotics addicts: psychological assessment. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992;4:207–213.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard R, Eckerman W, Rachal JV. Methods of validating self-reports of drug use: a critical review. Proc American Statistical Association. 1976;406-409.
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Johnson LD. Reliability and consistency in self-reports of drug use. Int J Addict. 1983;18:805–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacy AW, Widaman KF, Hays R, et al. Validity of self-reports of alcohol and other drug use: a multitrait-multimethod assessment. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985;49:219–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magura S, Goldsmith D, Casriel C, et al. The validity of methadone clients’ self-reported drug use. Int J Addict. 1987;22:727–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman MF, Bigelow GE. Validity of patients’ self-reported drug use as a function of treatment status. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1992;30:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babor TF, Stephens RS, Marlatt GA. Verbal report in clinical research on alcoholism: response bias and its minimization. J Stud Alcohol. 1987;48:410–424.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison PA, Holman NG. CATOR Report: Adult Outpatient Treatment Perspective on Admission and Outcome. St. Paul, MN: Ramsey Clinic; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Hser Y-I, Maglione M, Boyle K. Validity of self-report of drug use among STD patients, ER patients, and arrestees. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1999;25:81–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Farrell TJ, Cutter HS, Bayog RD, et al. Correspondence between one-year retrospective reports of pretreatment drinking by alcoholics and their wives. Behav Assess. 1987;6:263–274.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorentine R, Hillhouse MP. Self-e.cacy, expectancies, and abstinence acceptance: further evidence for the Addicted-Self Model of cessation of alcohol and drug dependent behavior. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 2000;26:497–521.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorentine R, Hillhouse MP. Replicating the Addicted-Self Model of recovery. Addict Behav. 2003;28:1063–1080.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorentine R. The Addicted Self Model of addictive behavior cessation: does it predict recovery for gender, ethnic, age, and drug preference populations. Am J Addict. 2003; in press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorentine R, Hillhouse MP. The Addicted-Self Model of alcohol and drug dependent behavior cessation: also a theory of “natural recovery”? J Drug Issues. 2001;31:395–424.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorentine R, Hillhouse MP. Why extensive participation in treatment and Twelve-Step programs is associated with the cessation of addictive behaviors: an application of the Addicted-Self Model of recovery? J Add Diseases. 2003;22:35–55.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson JW. An Introduction to Motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand; 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Feather NT, ed. Expectations and Actions: Expectancy-ValueModels in Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Album; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Rotter JB. Social Learning and Clinical Psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall; 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Tolman EC. Purposive Behavior in Animals and Men. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1932.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner B. Achievement Motivation and Attributional Theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner B. AnAttributional Theory ofMotivation and Emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Janis IL, Mann L. Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Con£ict, Choice, and Commitment. New York: The Free Press; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Cooley CH. Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Scribners; 1902.
   Google Scholar
• Mead GH. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1934.
   Google Scholar
• Bem DJ. Self-perception theory. In: Berkowitz L, ed. Cognitive Theories in Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press; 1978: 221–282.
   Google Scholar
• Prochaska JO, Diclemente CC. Toward a comprehensive model of change. In: Miller WR, Heather N, eds. Treating Addictive Behaviors: Process of Change. New York: Plenum Press; 1986: 3–27.
   Google Scholar
• Prochaska JO, Diclemente CC. Comments, criteria, and creating better models: in response to Davidson. In: Miller WR, Heather N, eds. Treating Addictive Behaviors. 2nd ed. New York: Plenum Press; 1998: 39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Prochaska JO, Diclemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change in smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;5:390–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull J. A self-awareness model of the causes and e¡ects of alcohol consumption. J Abnorm Psychol. 1981;20:586–600.
   Google Scholar
• Steele CM, Josephs R. Drinking your troubles away II: an attention-allocation model of alcohol’s e¡ect on psychological stress. J Abnorm Psychol. 1988;97:196–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt WA, Barnett LW, Branch LG. Relapse rates in addiction programs. J Clin Psychol. 1971;22:11–17.
   Google Scholar
• McGlothlin WH, Anglin MD, Wilson BD. A follow-up of admissions to the California Civil Addict Program. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1977;4:179–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurco DN, Cisin IH, Balter MB. Addict careers II: the ¢rst ten years. Int J Addict. 1981;16:1327–1356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaillant GE. What can long-term follow-up teach us about relapse and prevention of relapse in addiction? Br J Addict. 1988;83:1147–1157.
   Google Scholar
• Marlatt GA. Relapse prevention: theoretical rationale and overview of the model. In: Marlatt GA, Gordon JR, eds. Relapse Prevention: Maintenance Strategies in the Treatment ofAddictive Behaviors. New York: The Guilford Press; 1985:3–70.
   Google Scholar
• Larimer ME, Marlatt GA. Applications of relapse prevention with moderation goals. J Psychoactive Drugs. 1990;22:189–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlatt GA. The controlled-drinking controversy. American Psychologist. 1983; 1097–1110.
   Google Scholar
• Budd RJ, Rollnick S. The structure of the Readiness to Change Questionnaire: a test of Prochaska and DeClemente’s transtheoretical model. Br J Health Psychol. 1996;2:365–376.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton S. Can “stages of change” provide guidance in the treatment of addiction? A critical examination of Prochaska and DeClemente’s model. In: Edwards G, Dare CG, eds. Psychotherapy Psychological Treatments and the Addictions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1996: 189–205.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman MS, Brown SA, Christiansen BA, et al. Alcoholism etiology and memory: broadening the scope of alcohol expectancy research. Psychol Bull. 1991;110:137–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones BT, McMahon J. Changes in alcohol expectancies during treatment relate to subsequent abstinence survivorship. Br J Clin Psychol. 1996;35:221–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang AR, Michalec EM. Expectancy e¡ects in reinforcement from alcohol. In: Cox WM, ed. Why People Drink. New York: Gardner Press; 1990: 193–232.
   Google Scholar
• Leigh BC, Stacy AW. On the scope of alcohol expectancy research: remaining issues of measurement and meaning. Psychol Bull. 1991;110:147–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon J, Jones BT. Negative expectancy: the neglected factor in recovery from alcohol problems. Addict Res. 1993;1:145–155.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon J, Jones BT, O’Donnell P. Comparing positive and negative alcohol expectancies in male and female social drinkers. Addict Res. 1994;1:349–365.
   Google Scholar
• Crits-Christoph P, Siqueland L, Blaine J, et al. Psychosocial treatment for cocaine dependence: National Institute on Drug Abuse collaborative cocaine treatment study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56:493–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorentine R, Anglin MD. Does increasing the opportunity for counseling increase the e¡ectiveness of outpatient drug treatment? Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1997;23:369–382.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorentine R, Hillhouse MP. Drug treatment e¡ectiveness and counselor empathy: exploring the elects of gender and ethnic congruency. J Drug Issues. 1999;29:59–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorentine R. Counseling frequency and outpatient drug treatment: revisiting the conclusion that “more is better.” Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2001;27:617–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard R, Craddock SG, Flynn PM, et al. Overview of 1-year follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychol Addict Behav. 1997;11:261–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luborsky L, McLellan T, Woody GE, et al. Therapist success and its determinants. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985;42:602–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moos RH, King MJ. Participation in community residential treatment and substance abuse patients’ outcomes at discharge. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1997;14:71–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson DD, Joe GW, Brown BS. Treatment retention and follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychol Addict Behav. 1997;11:294–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson DD, Joe GW, Rowan-Szal GA. Drug abuse treatment retention and process elects on follow-up outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1997;47:227–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emrick CD. Alcoholics Anonymous: a.liation processes and electiveness as treatment. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1987;11:416–423.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorentine R. After drug treatment: is twelve-step elective in maintaining abstinence? Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1999;25:93–116.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorentine R, Hillhouse MP. Drug treatment and Twelve-step program participation: the additive elects of integrated recovery activities. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2000;18:65–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay JR, Alterman AI, McLellan AT, et al. Treatment goals, continuity of care, and outcome in a day hospital substance abuse rehabilitation program. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;15:254–259.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery HA, Miller WR, Tonigan JS. Dilerences among AA groups: implications for research. J Stud Alcohol. 1991;54:502–504.
   Google Scholar
• Ouimette PC, Finney JW, Moos RH. Twelve-step and cognitive-behavioral treatment for substance abuse: a comparison of treatment electiveness. J Consult Clin Psychology. 1997;65:230–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OuimettePC,MoosRH,Finney JW. Influence of outpatienttreatmentand12-stepgroupinvolvementonone-yearsubstanceabusetreatmentoutcomes. J Stud Alcohol. 1998;59:513–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar