Consumption and foraging behaviors for common stimulants (nicotine, caffeine)

References

• Orford J. Addiction as excessive appetite. Addiction 2001; 96:15–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning WG, Blumberg L, Moulton LH. The demand for alcohol: the differential response to price. J Health Economics 1995; 14:123–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester MB. Temporal and geographic patterns in opioid abuse in Texas. J Addictive Diseases 2012; 31:93–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman DL, Novak TP, Peralta M. Building consumer trust online. Communications of the ACM 1999; 42:80–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer JB, Konstan JA, Riedl J. E-commerce recommendation applications. Data Mining Knowledge Discovery 2001; 5:115–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravenhorst F, Muaremi A, Bardram J, Grünerbl A, Mayora O, Wurzer G, Frost M, Osmani V, Arnrich B, Lukowicz P, Tröster G. Mobile phones as medical devices in mental disorder treatment: an overview. Pers Ubiquit Comput 2015; 19:335–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montaner M, Lopez B, de la Rosa JL. A taxonomy of recommender agents on the internet. Artific Intelligence Rev 2003; 19:285–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig CR, Stitzel RE. Modern pharmacology with clinical applications. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams Wilkins, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Nehlig A. Are we dependent upon coffee and caffeine? A review on human and animal data. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1999; 23:563–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satel S. Is caffeine addictive?—a review of the literature. The American Journal of Drug Alcohol Abuse 2006; 32:493–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman ND, Park Y, Abnet CC, Hollenbeck AR, Sinha R. Association of coffee drinking with total and cause-specific mortality. New Eng J Med 2012; 366:1891–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reissig CJ, Strain EC, Griffiths RR. Caffeinated energy drinks—a growing problem. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009; 99:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juliano LM, Evatt DP, Richards BD, Griffiths RR. Characterization of individuals seeking treatment for caffeine dependence. Psychol Addict Behav 2012; 26:948–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith SE, Juliano LM, Hughes JR, Griffiths RR. Caffeine use disorder: a comprehensive review and research agenda. J Caffeine Res 2013; 3:114–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson SD. How do offenders choose where to offend? Perspectives from animal foraging. Legal Criminological Psychol 2014; 19:193–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor JL, Kypri K, Bell ML, Cousins K. Alcohol outlet density, levels of drinking, and alcohol-related harm in New Zealand: a national study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2011; 65(10):841–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston M. Alcohol outlet density and harm: comparing the impacts on violence and chronic harms. Drug Alcohol Rev 2011; 30(5):515–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day P, Breetzke G, Kingham S, Campbell M. Close proximity to alcohol outlets is associated with increased serious violent crime in New Zealand. Australian NZ J Public Health 2012; 36(1):48–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron MP, Cochrane W, Gordon C, Livingston M. Alcohol outlet density and violence: a geographically weighted regression approach. Drug Alcohol Rev 2015; http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.12295/full (accessed October 21, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan M. The mathematical mirror to animal nature. Nature 2008; 453:714–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickell WK, Giordano LA, Badger GJ. Risk-sensitive foraging theory elucidates risky choices made by heroin addicts. Addiction 2004; 99:855–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphries NE, Queiroz N, Dyer JRM, Pade NG, Musyl MK, Schaefer KM, et al. Environmental context explains Lévy and Brownian movement patterns of marine predators. Nature 2010; 465:1066–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JG, Ogeil RP. Decisional styles and risk of problem drinking or gambling. Pers Individ Diff 2011; 51:521–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartumeus F, Catalan J, Fulco UL, Lyra ML, Viswanathan GM. Optimising the encounter rate in biological interactions: Lévy versus Brownian strategies. Physical Rev Let 2002; 88:097901 (accessed October 21, 2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswanathan GM, Buidyrev SV, Havlins S, da Luz, MGE, Raposo EP, Stanley HE. Optimising the success of random searches. Nature 1999; 401:911–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volchenkov D, Helbach J, Tscherepanow M, Kuhnel S. Exploration exploitation trade-off features a saltatory search behaviour. J Royal Soc 2013; 10:20130352. (accessed October 21, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Baronchelli A, Radicchi R. Lévy flights in human behaviour and cognition. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2013; 56:101–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphries NE, Sims DW. Optimal foraging strategies: Lévy walks balance searching and patch exploitation under a very broad range of conditions. J Theor Biol 2014; 358:179–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster JL, Murray DM, Wolfson M, Wagenaar AC. Commercial availability of alcohol to young people: results of alcohol purchase attempts. Preventive Medicine 1995, 24:342–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auer M, Griffiths MD. Personalised feedback in the promotion of responsible gambling: a brief overview. Responsible Gamb Rev 2014; 1:27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Heron KE, Smyth JM. Ecological momentary interventions: incorporating mobile technology into psychosocial and health behaviour treatments. Brit J Health Psychol 2010; 15:1–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsch LA. Leveraging technology to enhance addiction treatment and recovery. J Addictive Diseases 2012; 31:313–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savic M, Best D, Rodda S, Lubman DI. Exploring the focus and experiences of smartphone applications for addiction recovery. J Addictive Diseases 2013; 32:310–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff R. Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychol Bull 1979; 86:446–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gossop M, Darke S, Griffiths P, Hando J, Powis B, Hall W, Strang J. The Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS): psychometric properties of the SDS in English and Australian samples of heroin, cocaine, and amphetamine users. Addiction 1995; 90:605–14.
   Google Scholar
• Martin G, Copeland J, Gates P, Gilmour S. The Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS) in an adolescent population of cannabis users: reliability, validity, and diagnostic cut-off. Drug Alcohol Depend 2006; 83:90–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topp L, Mattick RP. Choosing a cut-off on the Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS) for amphetamine users. Addiction 1997; 92:839–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SL, Walters EE, Zaslavsky AM. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med 2002; 32:959–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell CA, Hahn RA, Elder R, Brewer R, Chattopadhyay S, Fielding J, Naimi TS, Toomey T, Lawrence B, Middleton JC. The effectiveness of limiting alcohol outlet density as a means of reducing excessive alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms. Am J Prev Med 2009; 37:556–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huckle T, Conway K, Casswell S, Pledger M. Evaluation of a regional community action intervention in New Zealand to improve age checks for young people purchasing alcohol. Health Prom Int 2005; 20(2):147–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds RI, Holder HD, Gruenewald PJ. Community prevention and alcohol retail access. Addiction 1997; 92(Supp. 3):S261–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li F, Cao WY, Li MB, Xu Y, Zhang JW, Zhang JY, Luo XG, Dai RP, Zhou XF, Li CQ. A simple method for detection of food foraging behavior in the rat: involvement of NMDA and dopamine receptors in the behavior. Neuroscience 2012; 205:73–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosse RB, Fay-McCarthy M, Collins JP, Alim TN, Deutsch SI. The relationship between cocaine-induced paranoia and compulsive foraging: a preliminary report. Addiction 1994; 89:1097–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foltin RW. Effects of amphetamine, dexfenfluramine, diazepam, and other pharmacological and dietary manipulations on food “seeking” and “taking” behavior in non-human primates. Psychopharmacol 2001; 158:28–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainsbury S, Blaszczynski A. A systematic review of internet-based therapy for the treatment of addictions. Clin Psychol Rev 2011; 31:490–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong G, Ells DM, Camenga DR, Krishnan-Sarin S. Text messaging-based smoking cessation intervention: a narrative review. Addict Behav 2014; 39:907–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litvin EB, Abrantes AM, Brown RA. Computer and mobile technology-based interventions for substance use disorders: an organising framework. Addict Behav 2013; 38:1747–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González MC, Hidalgo CA, Barabási AL. Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature 2008; 453:779–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez D, Carlos HA, Adachi-Mejia AM, Berke EM, Sargent JD. Predictors of tobacco outlet density nationwide: a geographic analysis. Tobacco Control 2012; doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song C, Qu Z, Blumm N, Barabási A-L. Limits of predictability in human mobility. Science 2010; 327:1018–21.
   Google Scholar
• Kang C, Ma X, Tong D, Liu Y. Intra-urban human mobility patterns: an urban morphology perspective. Physica A 2012; 391:1702–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling SD, Vazire S, Srivastava S, John OP. Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. Am Psychol 2004; 59:93–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell B, Caine K, Connelly K, Doub T, Bragg A. Cell phone ownership and use among mental health outpatients in the USA. Pers Ubiquit Comput 2015; 19:367–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thayer RE, Hutchinson KE. Improving accuracy of adolescents' substance use reports via text messaging. Addiction 2012; 107:1015–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milward J, Day E, Wadsworth E, Strang J, Lynskey M. Mobile phone ownership, usage and readiness to use by patients in drug treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend 2015; 146:111–5.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips JG, Sargeant J, Ogeil RP, Chow YW, Blaszczynski A. Self-reported gambling problems and digital traces. CyberPsych Behav Soc Network 2014; 17(12):742–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clauset A, Shallizi CR, Newman MEJ. Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review 2009; 51:661–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman MP, Watkins NW, Yonkei E, Crowcroft J. Rhythm and randomness in human contact. International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining. Odense, Denmark, August 9–11, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kuntsche E, Labhart F. The future is now—using personal cellphones to gather data on substance use and related factors. Addiction 2014; 109:1052–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar