To Reveal or Conceal?: Privacy Management Processes among Interracial Romantic Partners

References

• Afifi, T. D. & Steuber, K. R. (2009). The revelation risk model (RRM): Factors that predict the revelation of secrets and the strategies used to reveal them. Communication Monographs, 76, 144–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman, I. & Taylor, D. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., Dun, T. & Sahlstein, E. (2001). Rules for relating communicated among social network members. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 173–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A. & Widenmann, S. (1993). Revealing and not revealing the status of romantic relationships to social networks. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 321–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramlett, M. D. & Mosher, W. D. (2002). Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and remarriage in the United States (Vol. 23). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Bratter, J. L. & King, R. B. (2008). “But will it last?”: Marital instability among interracial and same-race couples. Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 57, 160–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. (2007, August 16). Most Americans approve of interracial marriages: Blacks more likely than whites to approve of black-white unions. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/28417/most-americans-approve-interracial-marriages.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Caughlin, J. P. (2009). Secrets. In H. T. Reis & S. K Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia of human relationships (Vol. 3, pp. 1405–1407). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Caughlin, J. P., Afifi, W. A., Carpenter-Theune, K. E. & Miller, L. E. (2005). Reasons for, and consequences of, revealing personal secrets in close relationships: A longitudinal study. Personal Relationships, 12, 43–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughlin, J. P., Petronio, S. & Middleton, A. V. (2013). When families manage private information. In A. L. Vangelisti (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of family communication (2nd ed., pp. 321–337). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Caughlin, J. P. & Vangelisti, A. L. (2009). Why people conceal or reveal secrets. A multiple goals theory perspective. In T. D. Afifi & W. A. Afifi (Eds.), Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions (pp. 279–299). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clark-Ibánez, M. & Felmlee, D. (2004). Interethnic relationships: The role of social network diversity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 293–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duck, S. (1988). Relating to others. Pacific Cove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Duck, S. & VanderVoort, L. (2002). Scarlet letters and whited sepulchres: The social marking of relationships as “inappropriate.” In R. Goodwin & D. Cramer (Eds.), Inappropriate relationships: The unconventional, the disapproved, and the forbidden (pp. 3–24). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Durham, W. T. (2008). The rules-based process of revealing/concealing the family planning decisions of voluntarily child-free couples: A communication privacy management perspective. Communication Studies, 59, 132–147.
   Google Scholar
• Felmlee, D. H. (2001). No couple is an island: A social network perspective on dyadic stability. Social Forces, 79, 1259–1287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaines, S. O., Jr., & Leaver, J. (2002). Interracial relationships. In R. Goodwin & D. Cramer (Eds.), Inappropriate relationships: The unconventional, the disapproved, and the forbidden (pp. 65–78). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gallup, G., Jr., & Newport, F. (1991). For the first time, more Americans approve of interracial marriage than disapprove. Gallup Poll Monthly, 311, 60–61.
   Google Scholar
• Galvin, K. (2006). Diversity's impact on defining the family: Discourse-dependence and identity. In L. H. Turner & R. West (Eds.), The family communication sourcebook (pp. 3–20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• George, D. & Yancey, G. (2004). Taking stock of America's attitudes on cultural diversity: An analysis of public deliberation on multiculturalism, assimilation, and intermarriage. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 35, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, D. & Parks, M. (1990). Communicative strategies for managing the risks of seeking social support. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Personal relationships and social support. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, K. (2009). An integrated model of health disclosure decision-making. In T. D. Afifi & W. A. Afifi (Eds.), Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions (pp. 226–253). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, K., Derlega, V. J., Yep, G. & Petronio, S. (2003). Privacy and disclosure of HIV interpersonal relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, T. M. & Kalbfleisch, P. J. (2000). Interracial dating: The implications of race for initiating a romantic relationship. The Howard Journal of Communications, 11, 49–64.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, M. R. & Campbell, M. E. (2012). I wouldn't, but you can: Attitudes toward interracial relationships. Social Science Research, 41, 343–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. P. & Milardo, R. M. (1984). Network interference in pair relationships: A social psychological recasting of Slater's theory of social regression. Journal of Marriage and Family, 46, 893–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, A. L. & Afifi, T. D. (2010). Military wives' stressful disclosures to their deployed husbands: The role of protective buffering. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38, 412–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killian, K. D. (2001). Reconstituting racial histories and identities: The narratives of interracial couples. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27, 27–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A. (1998). Analyzing and reporting focus group results: Focus group kit 6. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmiller, J. J. (2012). Perceived marginalization and its association with physical and psychological health. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 451–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmiller, J. J. & Agnew, C. R. (2006). Marginalized relationships: The impact of social disapproval on romantic relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 40–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmiller, J. J. & Agnew, C. R. (2007). Perceived marginalization and the prediction of romantic relationship stability. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1036–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, S., Taylor, P. L. & Caudle, E. (2007). Interethnic and interracial dating in college: A longitudinal study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 323–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, R. P., Tempenis, M. & Walton, B. (1999). Crossing the line: Interracial couples in the South. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. E. (2009). Revealing and concealing postmarital dating information: Divorced coparents' privacy rule development and boundary coordination processes. Journal of Family Communication, 9, 135–149.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. C., Olson, M. A. & Fazio, R. H. (2004). Perceived reactions to interracial romantic relationships: When race is used as a cue to status. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7, 354–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, M. & Eggert, L. (1991). The role of social context in the dynamics of personal relationships. In W. H. Jones & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 2). London, England: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, M. (1998). Waiting for lightening to strike: Social support for interracial couples. In J. Martin T. Nakayama & L. A. Flores (Eds.), Readings in cultural contexts (pp. 379–387). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
   Google Scholar
• Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petronio, S. (2010). Communication privacy management theory: What do we know about family privacy regulation? Journal of Family Theory and Review, 2, 175–196.
   Google Scholar
• Petronio, S. (2013). Brief status report on communication privacy management theory. Journal of Family Communication, 13, 6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Pinkney, A. (1993). Black Americans (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Romo, L. K. (2011). Money talks: Revealing and concealing financial information in families. Journal of Family Communication, 11, 264–281.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, P., Karis, T. & Powell, R. (1995). Multiracial couples: Black & white voices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sprecher, S. (2011). The influence of social networks on romantic relationships: Through the lens of the social network. Personal Relationships, 18, 630–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprecher, S., Felmlee, D., Orbuch, D. L. & Willetts, M. C. (2002). Social networks and change in personal relationships. In A. Vangelisti H. Reis & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Stability and change in relationships (pp. 257–284). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steuber, K. R. & Solomon, D. H. (2011). “ So, when are you two having a baby?” Managing information with social network members during infertility. In M. Miller-Day (Ed.), Family communication, connections, and health transitions (pp. 297–322). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Steuber, K. R. & Solomon, D. H. (2012). Relational uncertainty, partner interference and privacy boundary turbulence: Explaining spousal discrepancies in infertility disclosures. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Surra, C. (1988). The influence of the interactive network on developing relationships. In R. M. Milardo (Ed.), Families and social networks. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J., Petronio, S. & Braithwaite, D. O. (2012). An examination of privacy rules for athletic/academic advisors and college student-athletes: A communication privacy management perspective. Communication Studies, 63, 54–76.
   Google Scholar
• Thorson, A. R. (2009). Adult children's experiences with their parent's infidelity: Communicative protection and access rules in the absence of divorce. Communication Studies, 60, 32–48.
   Google Scholar
• Tokic, A. & Pecnik, N. (2011). Parental behaviors related to adolescents' self-disclosure: Adolescents' views. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 201–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W. (2012). The rise of intermarriage: Rates, characteristics vary by race and gender. Pew Social and Demographic Trends, 1–56.
   Google Scholar
• Yancey, G. (2003). Who is white? London, England: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Yep, G. (2000). Disclosure of HIV infection in interpersonal relationships: A communication boundary management approach. In S. Petronio (Ed.), Balancing the secrets of private disclosures (pp. 83–95). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar