Testing the Impact of Student Preference for Face-to-Face Communication on Online Course Satisfaction

References

• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/changingcourse.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N., & Mabry, E. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 83–97. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1602_3
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M., Mabry, E., Mattrey, M., Bourhis, J., Titsworth, S., & Burrell, N. (2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of distance learning: A comparison using meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 54(3), 402–420. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02636.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, M., Omori, K., Burrell, N., Mabry, E., & Timmerman, E. (2013). Satisfaction with distance education. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 143–154). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., Boyles, J. L., & Rainie, L. (2012, July 27). The future of higher education. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/07/27/the-future-of-higher-education/
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, J., & Kumar, P. (2015). Students’ perceptions of teaching and social presence: A comparative analysis of face-to-face and online learning environments. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technology, 10, 27–44. doi:10.4018/ijwltt.2015010103
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, J., & Zmud, R. (1999). Channel expansion theory and the experimental nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 153–170. doi:10.2307/257090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S. H., & Smith, R. A. (2008). Effectiveness of personal communication in a learner-centered paradigm distance education class based on student satisfaction. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40, 407–426. doi:10.1080/15391523.2008.10782514
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, J. D., Campbell, S. M., Baker, H. M., & Leeds, E. M. (2014). The role of student characteristics in predicting retention in online courses. Research in Higher Education, 55, 27–48. doi:10.1007/s11162-013-9305-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, A. W., Kim, S.-Y., & Priddis, D. (2015). Examining the relationship between students’ perceptions of instructor communication of power online and student online course endorsement. Pennsylvania Communication Annual, 71, 11–36.
   Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements: Media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554–571. doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennen, V. P., Darabi, A. A., & Smith, L. J. (2007). Instructor-learner communication in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance Education, 28, 65–79. doi:10.1080/01587910701305319
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, K. (2008). Comparing modes of instruction: The relative efficacy of on-line and in-person teaching for student learning. PS: Political Science and Politics, 41, 387–391. doi:10.1017/S1049096508080608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Urso, S. C., & Rains, S. A. (2008). Examining the scope of channel expansion: A test of channel expansion theory with new and traditional communication media. Management Communication Quarterly, 21, 486–507. doi:10.1177/0893318907313712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, V., Simo, P., Sallan, J. M., & Enache, M. (2013). Evolution of online discussion forum richness according to channel expansion theory: A longitudinal panel data analysis. Computers & Education, 62, 32–40. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fillion, G., Limayem, M., Laferrière, T., & Mantha, R. (2009). Integrating information and communication technologies into higher education: Investigating onsite and online students’ points of view. Open Learning, 24, 223–240. doi:10.1080/02680510903201649
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (2000). The teacher-student relationship as an interpersonal relationship. Communication Education, 49, 207–219. doi:10.1080/03634520009379209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., Martin, M. M., & Bolkan, S. (2009). The development and validation of the student communication satisfaction scale. Communication Education, 58, 372–396. doi:10.1080/03634520902755441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2007). Student communication satisfaction, similarity, and liking as a function of attributional confidence. Ohio Communication Journal, 45, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, M. L. (1978). Toward a conceptualization of communication satisfaction. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 64, 47–62. doi:10.1080/00335637809383411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Choosing between online and face-to-face courses: Community college student voices. American Journal of Distance Education, 28, 27–38. doi:10.1080/08923647.2014.867697
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J., Killion, J., & Oomen, J. (2005). Student satisfaction in the virtual classroom. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 3, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kock, N., Verville, J., & Garza, V. (2007). Media naturalness and online learning: Findings supporting both the significant and no-significant-difference perspectives. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5, 333–355. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4609.2007.00144.x
   Google Scholar
• Lengel, R. H., & Daft, R. L. (1988). The selection of communication media as an executive skill. The Academy of Management Executive, 2, 225–232. doi:10.5465/ame.1988.4277259
   Google Scholar
• Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of communication. American Journal of Distance Education, 3, 1–6. doi:10.1080/08923648909526659
   Google Scholar
• Müller, T. (2008). Persistence of women in online degree-completion programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/455/1069
   Google Scholar
• Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35, 43–55. doi:10.1080/03634528609388318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prisbell, M. (1990). Classroom communication satisfaction, teacher uncertainty and course certainty over time. Communication Research Reports, 7, 20–24. doi:10.1080/08824099009359849
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, J. C., & Rice, M. L. (2002). A comparison of student outcomes and satisfaction between traditional and web based course offerings. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(3). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall53/rivera53.html
   Google Scholar
• Schubert-Irastorza, C., & Fabry, D. L. (2011). Improving student satisfaction with online faculty performance. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 4, 168–179.
   Google Scholar
• Sitzmann, T., Kraiger, K., Stewart, D., & Wisher, R. (2006). The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 59, 623–664. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00049.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sollitto, M., Johnson, Z. D., & Myers, S. A. (2013). Students’ perceptions of college classroom connectedness, assimilation, and peer relationships. Communication Education, 62, 318–331. doi:10.1080/03634523.2013.788726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers, J. J., Waigandt, A., & Whittaker, T. A. (2005). A comparison of student achievement and satisfaction in an online versus a traditional face-to-face statistics class. Innovative Higher Education, 29, 223–250. doi:10.1007/s10755-005-1938-x
   Google Scholar
• Timmerman, C. E., & Madhavapeddi, S. N. (2008). Perceptions of organizational media richness: Channel expansion effects for electronic and traditional media across richness dimensions. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 51, 18–32. doi:10.1109/tpc.2007.2000058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2014, June). Enrollment in distance education courses, by State: Fall 2012 (NCES 2014-023). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014023.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, R. R., & Qi, J. (2005). Classroom organization and participation: College students’ perceptions. Journal of Higher Education, 76, 570–601. doi:10.1353/jhe.2005.0038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, B. T., Welch, K. B., & Galecki, A. T. (2007). Linear mixed models: A practical guide using statistical software. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, P. L., Wheeless, L. R., & Allen, M. (2004). A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs, 71, 184–207. doi:10.1080/036452042000228054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Performance gaps between online and face-to-face courses: Difference across types of students and academic subject areas. The Journal of Higher Education, 85, 633–659. doi:10.1353/jhe.2014.0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar