Motivations for Complaint Avoidance: The Role of Motivational Systems and Conflict Expectations

References

• Afifi, T. D., McManus, T., Steuber, K., & Coho, A. (2009). Verbal avoidance and dissatisfaction in intimate conflict situations. Human Communication Research, 35(3), 357–383. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01355.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afifi, T. D., Olson, L. N., & Armstrong, C. (2005). The chilling effect and family secrets: Examining the role of self protection, other protection, and communication efficacy. Human Communication Research, 31(4), 564–598. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2005.tb00883.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afifi, W. A., & Afifi, T. D. (2009). Avoidance among adolescents in conversations about their parents’ relationship: Applying the theory of motivated information management. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(4), 488–511. doi:10.1177/0265407509350869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afifi, W. A., Morgan, S. E., Stephenson, M. T., Morse, C., Harrison, T., Reichert, T., & Long, S. D. (2006). Examining the decision to talk with family about organ donation: Applying the theory of motivated information management. Communication Monographs, 73(2), 188–215. doi:10.1080/03637750600690700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afifi, W. A., & Weiner, J. L. (2006). Seeking information about sexual health: Applying the theory of motivated information management. Human Communication Research, 32(1), 35–57. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00002.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aloia, L. S., & Solomon, D. H. (2013). Perceptions of verbal aggression in romantic relationships: The role of family history and motivational systems. Western Journal of Communication, 77, 411–423. doi:10.1080/10570314.2013.776098
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. doi:10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, M. J., & McCroskey, J. C. (1998). Interpersonal communication as temperamental expression: A communibiological paradigm. In J. C. McCroskey, J. A. Daly, M. M. Martin, & M. J. Beatty (Eds.), Communication and personality: Trait perspectives (pp. 41–68). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, M. J., McCroskey, J. C., & Valencic, K. M. (2001). The biology of communication: A communibiological perspective. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchine, T. P., Katkin, E. S., Strassberg, Z., & Snarr, J. (2001). Disinhibitory psychopathology in male adolescents: Discriminating conduct disorder from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder through concurrent assessment of multiple autonomic states. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(4), 610–624. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.110.4.610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, D. S., & Willingham, J. K. (1997). Affective traits, responses to conflict, and satisfaction in romantic relationships. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(4), 564–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, J. L., Finan, A., & Kaminsky, A. (2008). Modeling serial arguments in close relationships: The serial argument process model. Human Communication Research, 34, 600–624. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00334.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S. (1997). Adult attachment and personality: Converging evidence and a new measure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(8), 865–883. doi:10.1177/0146167297238007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 319–333. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.67.2.319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloven, D. H., & Roloff, M. E. (1993). The chilling effect of aggressive potential on the expression of complaints in intimate relationships. Communications Monographs, 60(3), 199–219. doi:10.1080/03637759309376309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corr, P. J. (2004). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 28(3), 317–332. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corr, P. J. (2010). The psychoticism–psychopathy continuum: A neuropsychological model of core deficits. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(6), 695–703. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.12.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupach, W. R. (2007). Paid and criticism from a partner. In B. H. Spitzberg & W. R. Cupach (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 143–168). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cupach, W. R., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1983). Trait versus state: A comparison of dispositional and situational measures of interpersonal communication competence. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 364–379. doi:10.1080/10570318309374131
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P. (1989). Types of influence goals in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6(3), 293–308. doi:10.1177/0265407589063004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillow, M. R., & Labelle, S. (2014). Discussions of sexual health testing: Applying the theory of motivated information management. Personal Relationships, 21(4), 676–691. doi:10.1111/pere.12057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryden, W., & Hurton, N. R. (2013). What I felt like doing, but did not do when I felt hurt: An REBT-based investigation of action tendencies that are not acted on. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 31, 179–198. doi:10.1007/s10942-013-0169-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. (1999). Conflict in marriage: Implications for working with couples. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 47–77. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. (2010). Of memes and marriage: Toward a positive relationship science. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2, 4–24. doi:10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00033.x
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck’s theory of personality. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), A model of personality (pp. 246–276). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. A. (1987). The psychology of fear and stress. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, L. S. (2002). Integrating an emotion-focused approach to treatment into psychotherapy integration. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 12, 154–189. doi:10.1037/1053-0479.12.2.154
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D., & Dallinger, J. M. (1995). A Lewinian perspective on talking conflict personally: Revision, refinement, and validation of the instrument. Communication Quarterly, 43(3), 297–319. doi:10.1080/01463379509369978
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D., & Irions, A. (2014). Argument engagement under invitational versus demanding conditions. In C. H. Palczewski (Ed.), Disturbing argument (pp. 149–154). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D., Richards, A. S., & Skubisz, C. (2013). Blurting. Communication Monographs, 80, 503–532. doi:10.1080/03637751.2013.830316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Heym, N., Ferguson, E., & Lawrence, C. (2008). An evaluation of the relationship between Gray’s revised RST and Eysenck’s PEN: Distinguishing BIS and FFFS in Carver and White’s BIS/BAS scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 709–715. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• High, A. C., & Solomon, D. H. (2014). Motivational systems and preferences for social support strategies. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 463–474. doi:10.1007/s11031-014-9394-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovick, S. R. (2014). Understanding family health information seeking: A test of the theory of motivated information management. Journal of Health Communication, 19(1), 6–23. doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.778369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. J., Averbeck, J. M., Kelley, K. M., & Liu, S. (2011). When serial arguments predict harm: Examining the influences of argument function, topic of the argument, perceived resolvability, and argumentativeness. Argumentation and Advocacy, 47, 214–227.
   Google Scholar
• Keiser, H. N., & Ross, S. R. (2011). Carver and White’s BIS/FFFS/BAS scales and domains and facets of the five factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(1), 39–44. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, R. M. (1996). Complaints and complaining: Functions, antecedents, and consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 179–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, R. M. (2002). Whining, griping, and complaining: Positivity in the negativity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1023–1035. doi:10.1002/jclp.10095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, R. M. (2003). Complaining, teasing, and other annoying behaviors. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalski, R. M., Allison, B., Giumetti, G. W., Turner, J., Whittaker, E., Frazee, L., & Stephens, J. (2014). Pet peeves and happiness: How do happy people complain? Journal of Social Psychology, 154, 278–282. doi:10.1080/00224545.2014.906380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurenceau, J. P., Kleinman, B. M., Kaczynski, K. J., & Carver, C. S. (2010). Assessment of relationship-specific incentive and threat sensitivities: Predicting satisfaction and affect in adult intimate relationships. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 407–419. doi:10.1037/a0019231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, E., & Roloff, M. E. (2015). Regret for complaint withholding. Communication Quarterly, 64(1), 72–92. doi:10.1080/01463373.2015.1103280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makoul, G., & Roloff, M. E. (1998). The role of efficacy and outcome expectations in the decision to withhold relational complaints. Communication Research, 25(1), 5–29. doi:10.1177/009365098025001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, T., Sherman, D., & Updegraff, J. (2004). Dispositional motivations and message framing: A test of the congruency hypothesis in college students. Health Psychology, 23, 330–334. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.23.3.330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCurry, A. L., Schrodt, P., & Ledbetter, A. M. (2012). Relational uncertainty and communication efficacy as predictors of religious conversations in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(8), 1085–1108. doi:10.1177/0265407512449402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, N., & Corr, P. J. (2004). A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: Fear/anxiety and defensive distance. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28(3), 285–305. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill, A. F., & Afifi, T. D. (2012). Examining the bidirectional nature of topic avoidance and relationship dissatisfaction: The moderating role of communication skills. Communication Monographs, 79(4), 499–521. doi:10.1080/03637751.2012.723809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, B., Olivier, L., & Roth, D. A. (2005). Please don’t leave me! BIS/BAS, attachment styles, and responses to a relationship threat. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(1), 151–162. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D., Zeichner, A., & Wilson, L. F. (2012). Personality correlates of aggression: Evidence from measures of the five-factor model, UPPS model of impulsivity, and BIS/BAS. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 2903–2919. doi:10.1177/0886260512438279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, S. E., & Stutman, R. K. (1988). The social confrontation episode. Communications Monographs, 55(3), 266–285. doi:10.1080/03637758809376172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olshtain, E., & Weinbach, L. (1993). Interlanguage features of the speech act of complaining. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 108–122). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. D., & Gray, J. A. (1999). The neuroscience of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd, pp. 277–299). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rafferty, K. A., Cramer, E., Priddis, D., & Allen, M. (2015). Talking about end-of-life preferences in marriage: Applying the theory of motivated information management. Health Communication, 30(4), 409–418. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.889555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, A. S. (2016). Assessing the structure of efficacy and outcome expectancies in the decision to disclose secrets: A comparison of contrasting theories. Communication Reports, 29(1), 50–61. doi:10.1080/08934215.2015.1038841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roloff, M. E., & Cloven, D. H. (1990). The chilling effect in interpersonal relationships: The reluctance to speak one’s mind. In D. D. Cahn (Ed.), Intimates in conflict: A communication perspective (pp. 49–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Roloff, M. E., & Ifert, D. E. (2000). Conflict management trough avoidance: Withholding complaints, suppressing arguments, and declaring topics taboo. In S. Petronio (Ed.), Balancing the secrets of private disclosures (pp. 151–179). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Roloff, M. E., & Solomon, D. H. (2002). Conditions under which relational commitment leads to expressing or withholding relational complaints. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13(3), 276–391. doi:10.1108/eb022877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roose, A., Bijttebier, P., Claes, L., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2011). Psychopathic traits in adolescence: Associations with the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory systems. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(2), 201–205. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L., & Bigsby, E. (2010). Behavioral activation/inhibition systems and emotions: A test of valence vs. action tendency hypotheses. Communication Monographs, 77, 1–26. doi:10.1080/03637750903514268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L., & Dillard, J. P. (2007). The influence of behavioral inhibition/approach systems and message framing on the processing of persuasive health messages. Communication Research, 34, 433–467. doi:10.1177/0093650207302787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L., & Dillard, J. P. (2009). Message frames interact with motivational systems to determine depth of message processing. Health Communication, 24, 504–514. doi:10.1080/10410230903104897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L., & Kollar, L. M. M. (2015). Testing moderators of message framing effect: A motivational approach. Communication Research, 42, 626–648. doi:10.1177/0093650213493924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, D. J., & Boeck, P. D. (2006). From BIS/BAS to the big five. European Journal of Personality, 20, 255–270. doi:10.1002/per.583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, D. H., Knobloch, L. K., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2004). Relational power, marital schema, and decisions to withhold complaints: An investigation of the chilling effect on confrontation in marriage. Communication Studies, 55(1), 146–167. doi:10.1080/10510970409388610
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, D. H., & Samp, J. A. (1998). Power and problem appraisal: Perceptual foundations of the chilling effect in dating relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(2), 191–209. doi:10.1177/0265407598152004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahba, J. S., & McCroskey, J. C. (2005). Temperament and brain systems as predictors of assertive communication traits. Communication Research Reports, 22, 157–164. doi:10.1080/00036810500139829
   Google Scholar
• Worley, T. R., & Samp, J. (2016a). Complaint avoidance and complaint-related appraisals in close relationships: A Dyadic power theory perspective. Communication Research, 43, 391–413. doi:10.1177/0093650214538447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worley, T. R., & Samp, J. A. (2016b). Gendered associations of decision-making power, topic avoidance, and relational satisfaction: A differential influence model. Communication Reports, 29, 1–12. doi:10.1080/08934215.2015.1025988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worley, T. R., & Samp, J. A. (2017). Rejection sensitivity, complaint-related communication, and relational satisfaction: A mediation analysis. Paper presented at SSCA conference in Greenville, SC.
   Google Scholar