Comedic Cognition: The Impact of Elaboration on Political Comedy Effects

References

• Amarasingam, A. (2011). The Stewart/Colbert effect: Essays on the real impacts of fake news. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
   Google Scholar
• Apter, M. J. (2001). An introduction to reversal theory. In M. J. Apter (Ed.), Motivational styles in everyday life: A guide to reversal theory (pp. 3–36). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Apter, M. J. (2007). Reversal theory: The dynamics of motivation, emotion, and personality (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oneworld.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, M. A. (2002). Sex, lies, and war: How soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public. The American Political Science Review, 96(1), 91–109. doi:10.1017/S0003055402004252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, J. C., & Morris, J. C. (2006). The daily show effect: Candidate evaluations, efficacy, and American youth. American Politics Research, 34, 341–367. doi:10.1177/1532673X05280074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, J. C., & Morris, J. S. (2008). One “nation,” under Stephen? The effects of the Colbert Report on American youth. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 622–643. doi:10.1080/08838150802437487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baym, G. (2005). The daily show: Discursive integration and the reinvention of political journalism. Political Communication, 22, 259–276. doi:10.1080/10584600591006492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baym, G. (2010). From Cronkite to Colbert: The evolution of broadcast news. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, A. B. (2011). Political humor as democratic relief? The effects of exposure to comedy and straight news on trust and efficacy. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 19, 235–250. doi:10.1080/15456870.2011.622191
   Google Scholar
• Becker, A. B., & Bode, L. (2018). Satire as a source for learning? The differential impact of news versus satire exposure on net neutrality knowledge gain. Information, Communication, & Society, 21, 612–625. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1301517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, A. B., & Waisanen, D. J. (2013). From funny features to entertaining effects: Connecting approaches to communication research on political comedy. The Review of Communication, 13, 161–183. doi:10.1080/15358593.2013.826816
   Google Scholar
• Blake, M. (2015, February 4). Seven things we learned at breakfast with John Oliver. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-john-oliver-last-week-tonight-season-2-20150204-story.html
   Google Scholar
• Boukes, M., Boomgaarden, H. G., Moorman, M., & de Vreese, C. H. (2015). At odds: Laughing or thinking? The appreciation, processing, and persuasiveness of political satire. Journal of Communication, 65, 721–744. doi:10.1111/jcom.12173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2016). The end of framing as we know it … and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 7–23. doi:10.1080/15205436.2015.106881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Morris, K. J. (1983). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 805–818. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, X. (2010). Hearing it from Jon Stewart: The impact of the Daily Show on public attentiveness to politics. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(1), 26–46. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edp043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, X., & Brewer, P. R. (2008). Political comedy shows and public participation in politics. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(1), 90–99. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edm030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. (2013). Learning about politics from the Daily Show: The role of viewer orientation and processing motivations. Mass Communication and Society, 16(4), 586–607. doi:10.1080/15205436.2012.735742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfried, J., Barthel, M., Shearer, E., & Mitchell, A. (2016, February 4). The 2016 presidential campaign: A news event that’s hard to miss. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2016/02/04/the-2016-presidential-campaign-a-news-event-thats-hard-to-miss/
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, M. G., Sorenson, M. E., & Warner, B. R. (2016). Ferguson on Facebook: Political persuasion in a new era of media effects. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, B. W., Gottfried, J. A., Winneg, K. M., & Jamieson, K. H. (2014). Stephen Colbert’s civics lesson: How Colbert Super PAC taught viewers about campaign finance. Mass Communication and Society, 17(3), 329–353. doi:10.1080/15205436.2014.891138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmore, E. (2014, June 14). How John Oliver started a revolution in US TV’s political satire. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2014/jun/15/john-oliver-started-a-revolution-in-us-tv-political-satire
   Google Scholar
• Hensch, M. (2016, March 30). Report: ‘Donald Drumpf’ nets John Oliver ratings high. The Hill. Retrieved from http://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/274720-report-donald-drumpf-nets-john-oliver-ratings-high
   Google Scholar
• Hmielowski, J. D., Holbert, R. L., & Lee, J. (2011). Predicting the consumption of political TV satire: Affinity for political humor, The Daily Show, and The Colbert Report. Communication Monographs, 78(1), 96–114. doi:10.1080/03637751.2010.542579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbert, R. L., Lee, J., Esralew, S., Walther, W. O., Hmielowski, J. D., & Landreville, K. D. (2013). Affinity for political humor: An assessment of internal factor structure, reliability, and validity. Humor, 26(4), 551–572. doi:10.1515/humor-2013-0034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, B. A. (2005). Late-night learning: Do entertainment programs increase political campaign knowledge for young viewers? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(4), 402–415. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4904_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. P. (2010). Entertaining politics: Satiric television and political engagement. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, J. M., Hui, H. C., Min, K. S., & Martin, D. (2014). Does telic/paratelic user mode matter on the effectiveness of interactive internet advertising? A reversal theory perspective. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1303–1309. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Dawson, E. C., & Slovic, P. (2017). Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(1), 54–86. doi:10.1017/bpp.2016.2
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. J. (2014, October 31). How John Oliver usurped a genre. Harvard Political Review. Retrieved from http://harvardpolitics.com/books-arts/john-oliver-usurped-genre/
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. M., & Vishak, J. (2008). Just laugh! You don’t need to remember: The effects of entertainment media on political information acquisition and information processing in political judgment. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 338–360. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00388.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• LaMarre, H. (2013). When parody and reality collide: Examining the effects of Colbert’s Super PAC satire on issue knowledge and policy engagement across media formats. International Journal of Communication, 7, 394–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Last Week Tonight with John Oliver. (2015). U.S. territories. [Web video]. YouTube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CesHr99ezWE
   Google Scholar
• Last Week Tonight with John Oliver. (n.d.) HBO. Retrieved from https://www.hbo.com/last-week-tonight-with-john-oliver
   Google Scholar
• Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K., & Schoemann, A. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18, 285–300. doi:10.1037/a0033266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2013). The rationalizing voter. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manosevitch, E., Steinfeld, N., & Lev-On, A. (2014). Promoting online deliberation quality: Cognitive cues matter. Information, Communication, & Society, 17(10), 1177–1195. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.899610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227–234. doi:10.1037/h0031564
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nabi, R. L., Moyer-Gusé, E., & Byrne, S. (2007). All joking aside: A serious investigation into the persuasive effect of funny social issue messages. Communication Monographs, 74(1), 29–54. doi:10.1080/03637750701196896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1997). Priming and media impact on the evaluations of the president’s performance. Communication Research, 24(1), 3–30. doi:10.1177/009365097024001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Postman, L., Jenkins, W. O., & Postman, D. L. (1948). An experimental comparison of active recall and recognition. The American Journal of Psychology, 61, 511–519. doi:10.2307/1418315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, C. (2017, November 14). How John Oliver made America pay attention to long-form reporting again. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/careypurcell/2017/11/14/how-john-oliver-made-america-pay-attention-to-long-form-reporting-again/#43d2287f657e
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, R. A. (1997). A validation test of a message elaboration measure. Communication Research Reports, 14(3), 269–278. doi:10.1080/08824099709388670
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian, C. (2012, April 5). Stephen Colbert’s Super PAC satires land him a Peabody. TIME. Retrieved from http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/04/05/stephen-colberts-super-pac-satire-lands-him-a-peabody/
   Google Scholar
• Suebsaeng, A. (2014, September 29). ‘Last Week Tonight’ does real journalism, no matter what John Oliver says. The Daily Beast. Retrieved from https://www.thedailybeast.com/last-week-tonight-does-real-journalism-no-matter-what-john-oliver-says
   Google Scholar
• Warner, B. R., Hawthorne, H. J., & Hawthorne, J. (2015). A dual-processing approach to the effects of viewing political comedy. Humor, 28(4), 541–558. doi:10.1515/humor-2015sey0099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xenos, M. A., & Becker, A. B. (2009). Moments of Zen: Effects of The Daily Show on information seeking and political learning. Political Communication, 26(3), 317–332. doi:10.1080/10584600903053569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D. G. (2008). The privileged role of the late-night joke: Exploring humor’s role in disrupting argument scrutiny. Media Psychology, 11(1), 119–142. doi:10.1080/15213260701837073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zipkin, N. (2016, June 6). What you can learn from the viral shenanigans of Last Week Tonight with John Oliver. Entrepreneur. Retrieved from https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/277043
   Google Scholar