(Not) Talking Politics: Motivations and Strategies for Avoiding the Expression of Political Opinions

References

• Ackerman, B., & Fishkin, J. S. (2002). Deliberation day. Journal of Political Philosophy, 10(2), 129–152. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/162?utm_source=digitalcommons.law.yale.edu%2Ffss_papers%2F162&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afifi, W. A., & Guerrero, L. (2000). Motivations underlying topic avoidance in close relationships. In S. Petronio (Ed.), Balancing the secrets of private disclosures (pp. 165–180). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Altman, I., & Taylor, D. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy. Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Chovil, N., & Mullett, J. (1990). Sage series in interpersonal communication (Vol. 11). Equivocal communication. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Wilmot, W. W. (1985). Taboo topics in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 253–269. doi:10.1177/0265407585023002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrend, T. S., Sharek, D. J., Meade, A. W., & Wiebe, E. N. (2011). The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 800–813. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0081-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello, R. (2005). Situational formality, personality, and avoidance-avoidance: Conflict as causes of interpersonal equivocation. Southern Communication Journal, 70(4), 285–299. doi:10.1080/10417940509373335
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casler, K., Bickel, L., & Hackett, E. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2156–2160. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. (2003). Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6, 307–326. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover, P. J., Searing, D. D., & Crewe, I. M. (2002). The deliberative potential of political discussion. British Journal of Political Science, 32, 21–62. doi:10.1017/S0007123402000029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dailey, R. M., & Palomares, N. A. (2004). Strategic topic avoidance: An investigation of topic avoidance frequency, strategies used, and relational correlates. Communication Monographs, 71(4), 471–496. doi:10.1080/0363452042000307443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, C. C. (2009). Learning political information from the news: A closer look at the role of motivation. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 243–261. doi:10.1111/jcom.2009.59.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1939). Creative democracy. Retrieved from https://www.philosophie.uni-muenchen.de/studium/das_fach/warum_phil_ueberhaupt/dewey_creative_democracy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dillow, M. R., Dunleavy, K. N., & Weber, K. (2009). The impact of relational characteristics and reasons for topic avoidance on relational closeness. Communication Quarterly, 57(2), 205–223. doi:10.1080/01463370902889190
   Google Scholar
• Dillow, M. R., Morse, C. R., & Afifi, W. A. (2008). Romantic reconciliation as influenced by implicit theories of relationships and information seeking style. Human Communication, 11(3), 357–366.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan-Kicken, E., & Caughlin, J. P. (2010). A multiple goals perspective on topic avoidance and relationship satisfaction in the context of breast cancer. Communication Monographs, 77(2), 231–256. doi:10.1080/03637751003758219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan-Kicken, E., Guinn, T. D., Romo, L. K., & Ciceraro, L. D. (2011). Thanks for asking, but let’s talk about something else: Reactions to topic-avoidance messages that feature different interaction goals. Communication Research, 40(3), 308–366. doi:0093650211422537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. (1995). Bringing deliberation to democracy: The British experiment. The Good Society, 5(3), 45–49.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. (1991). Democracy and deliberation: New directions for democratic reform (Vol. 217). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fram, S. M. (2013). The constant comparative analysis method outside of grounded theory. The Qualitative Report, 18(1), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, C. J. (1997). Public opinion as a normative opinion process. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 20 (pp. 157–183). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18(3), 213–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, S. K., Haydon, A. A., Herring, A. H., & Halpern, C. T. (2014). Longitudinal consistency in self-reported age of first vaginal intercourse among young adults. Journal of Sex Research, 51(1), 97–106. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.719169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. (2007). Exploring the forms of self-censorship: On the spiral of silence and the use of opinion expression avoidance strategies. Journal of Communication, 57, 785–802. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00368.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., Glynn, C. J., & Shanahan, J. (2005). Validating the willingness to self-censor scale: Individual differences in the effect of the climate of opinion on opinion expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(4), 443–455. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbing, M. V., Ritchie, M., & Anderson, M. R. (2011). Personality and political discussion. Political Behavior, 33, 601–624. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9147-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology, 25(1), 65–95. doi:10.1111/pops.2004.25.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joffe, H., & Yardley, L. (2004). Content and thematic analysis. In D. F. Marks & L. Yardley (Eds.), Research methods for clinical and health psychology (pp. 56–68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kennamer, J. D. (1990). Self-serving biases in perceiving the opinions of others: Implications for the spiral of silence. Communication Research, 17(3), 393–404. doi:10.1177/009365090017003006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Wyatt, R. O., & Katz, E. (1999). News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political Communication, 16, 361–385. doi:10.1080/105846099198541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch, K. R., Gastil, J., Reedy, J., & Cramer Walsh, K. (2013). Did they deliberate? Applying an evaluative model of democratic deliberation to the Oregon Citizens’ initiative review. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 41(2), 105–125. doi:10.1080/00909882.2012.760746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., Morrison, K. R., & Schemer, C. (2010). A spiral of silence for some: Attitude certainty and the expression of political minority opinions. Communication Research, 37(6), 774–800. doi:10.1177/0093650210362685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelberg, T. (2002). The deliberative citizen: Theory and evidence. In M. X. Delli Carpini, L. Huddy, & R. Shapiro (Eds.), Research in micropolitics: Political decisionmaking, deliberation and participation (pp. 151–193). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchelstein, E. (2011). Catharsis and community: Divergent motivations for audience participation in online newspapers and blogs. International Journal of Communication, 5, 2014–2034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, B. M., & Baxter, L. A. (1988). Dialectical approaches to studying personal relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 838–855. doi:10.2307/3088437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C., & Martin, P. S. (2001). Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: The role of mass media. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 97–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C., & Mondak, J. J. (2006). The workplace as a context for cross‐cutting political discourse. The Journal of Politics, 68(1), 140–155. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00376.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). The spiral of silence: Public opinion - our social skin (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noelle‐Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence a theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peacock, C., & Leavitt, P. (2016). Engaging young people: Deliberative preferences in discussions about news and politics. SocialMedia + Society, 2(1), 1–11. doi:10.1177/2056305116637096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, V., & Oshagan, H. (1995). Social-psychological perspectives on public opinion. In T. L. Glasser & C. T. Salmon (Eds.), Public opinion and the communication of consent (pp. 177–216). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schuckit, M. A., & Smith, T. L. (2013). Stability of scores and correlations with drinking behaviors over 15 years for the self-report of the effects of alcohol questionnaire. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 128(3), 194–199. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.08.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sifianou, M. (1997). Silence and politeness. In A. Jaworski (Ed.), Silence: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 63–84). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 526–537. doi:10.1037/h0037039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamp, G. H., Vangelisti, A. L., & Daly, J. A. (1992). The creation of defensiveness in social interaction. Communication Quarterly, 40(2), 177–190. doi:10.1080/01463379209369832
   Google Scholar
• Ting-Toomey, S., & Oetzel, J. G. (2002). Cross-cultural face concerns and conflict styles. In W. B. Gudykunst & B. Mody (Eds.), Handbook of international and intercultural communication (pp. 143–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (2011). Challenges of ordinary democracy: A case study in deliberation and dissent. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ulbig, S. G., & Funk, C. L. (1999). Conflict avoidance and political participation. Political Behavior, 21(3), 265–282. doi:10.1023/A:1022087617514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vangelisti, A. L. (2002). Interpersonal processes in romantic relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 643–679). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar