Perceptions of Interability Communication in an Interpersonal Relationship and the Reduction of Intergroup Prejudice

References

• Allen, B. J. (2011). Ability matters. In B. J. Allen (Ed.), Difference matters: Communicating social identity (pp. 137–160). New York, NY: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, V. (2007). Young adults’ reactions to grandparent painful self-disclosure: The influence of grandparent sex and overall motivations for communication. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 64, 195–215. doi:10.2190/KTNU-0373-20W7-4781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialik, K. (2017). 7 facts about Americans with disabilities. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/07/27/7-facts-about-americans-with-disabilities/
   Google Scholar
• Biernat, M., & Crandall, C. S. (1994). Stereotyping and contact with social groups: Measurement and conceptual issues. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 659–677. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420240604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blockmans, I. G. E. (2015). “Not wishing to be the white rhino in the crowd”: Disability-disclosure at university. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34, 158–180. doi:10.1177/0261927X14548071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, D. O., & Braithwaite, C. A. (2003). “Which is my good leg?”: Cultural communication of persons with disabilities. In L. A. Samovar, R. E. Porter, & E. R. McDaniel (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (pp. 165–176). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, D. O., & Labrecque, D. (1994). Responding to the Americans with disabilities act: Contributions of interpersonal communication research and training. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 287–294. doi:10.1080/00909889409365403
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 255–343. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37005-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics, Press Office. (2019). Persons with a disability: Labor force characteristics summary – 2019 [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/disabl.nr0.htm
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R., & MacGeorge, E. L. (2002). Supportive communication. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 374–424). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). 53 million adults in the us live with a disability [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2015/p0730-us-disability.html
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. C. (1991). Good days, bad days: The self in chronic illness and time. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S., & McKay, G. (1984). Social support, stress, and the buffering hypothesis: A theoretical analysis. In A. Baum, S. E. Taylor, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology and health (pp. 253–267). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J. E., Salter, A., & Stadler, G. (2017). Identity concealment and chronic illness: A strategic choice. Journal of Social Issues, 73, 359–378. doi:10.1111/josi.12221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutrona, C. E. (1996). Social support in couples. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, S. A., & Giles, H. (1996). Interability communication: Evaluating patronizing encounters. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 265–290. doi:10.1177/0261927X960153004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common intergroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, D. J., & Albrecht, T. L. (2011). Social support, social networks, and health: A guiding framework. In T. L. Thompson, R. Parrott, & J. Nussbaum (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of health communication (pp. 335–348). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, J., Hewstone, M., Paolini, S., & Voci, A. (2005). Grandparent-grandchild contact and attitudes toward older adults: Moderator and mediator effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 393–406. doi:10.1177/0146167204271577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, P., & Rosenthal, H. E. S. (2011). Prejudice against Muslims: Anxiety as a mediator between intergroup contact and attitudes, perceived group variability and behavioural intentions. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34, 40–61. doi:10.1080/01419871003763312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imamura, M., Ruble, R. A., & Zhang, Y. B. (2016). English proficiency, identity, anxiety, and intergroup attitudes: US Americans’ perceptions of Chinese. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 45, 526–539. doi:10.1080/17475759.2016.1240704
   Google Scholar
• Imamura, M., Zhang, Y. B., & Shim, C. (2012). US host nationals’ attitudes toward Japanese: The role of communication and relational solidarity in the intergroup contact hypothesis. Asian Journal of Communication, 22, 584–600. doi:10.1080/01292986.2012.717096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, M. R., & Hewstone, M. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and out-group attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 700–710. doi:10.1177/0146167293196005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, R. M., & Galgay, C. E. (2010). Microaggressive experiences of people with disabilities. In D. W. Sue (Ed.), Microaggressions and marginality: Manifestation, dynamics, and impact (pp. 241–267). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kunkel, A. W., & Burleson, B. R. (1999). Assessing explanations for sex differences in emotional support: A test of the different cultures and skill specialization accounts. Human Communication Research, 25, 307–340. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1999.tb00448.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, N., Zhang, Y. B., & Wiebe, W. T. (2017). Initial communication with and attitudes toward international students: Testing the mediating effects of friendship formation variables. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 46, 330–345. doi:10.1080/17475759.2017.1344999
   Google Scholar
• Longmore, P. K., & Umansky, L. (2001). The new disability history: American perspectives. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, C. K., & Harrington, N. G. (2000). Invisible disability. In D. O. Braithwaite & T. L. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and people with disabilities (pp. 405–421). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, P. (2003). The root of all evil in intergroup relations? Unearthing the categorization process. In R. Brown & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 3–21). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice?: Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922–934. doi:10.1002/ejsp.504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, G. R., Sarason, I. G., & Sarason, B. R. (1991). General and relationship-based perceptions of social support: Are two constructs better than one? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 1028–1039. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.1028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruble, R. A., & Zhang, Y. B. (2012). The impact of stereotypes on American students’ willingness to communicate with Chinese international students. The Bulletin of the Association of College Unions International, 80, 30–34.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, E. B., Bajorek, S., Beaman, A., & Anas, A. P. (2005). “I just want you to know that ‘them’ is me”: Intergroup perspectives on communication and disability. In J. Harwood & H. Giles (Eds.), Intergroup communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 117–140). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer-Rodgers, J. (2001). Consensual and individual stereotypic beliefs about international students among American host nationals. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 25, 639–657. doi:10.1016/S0147-1767(01)00029-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer-Rodgers, J., & McGovern, T. (2002). Attitudes toward the culturally different: The role of intercultural communication barriers, affective responses, consensual stereotypes, and perceived threat. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26, 609–631. doi:10.1016/S0147-1767(02)00038-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157–175. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01134.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swart, H., Hewstone, M., Christ, O., & Voci, A. (2011). Affective mediators of intergroup contact: A three-wave longitudinal study in South Africa. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1221–1238. doi:10.1037/a0024450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tringo, J. L. (1970). The hierarchy of preference toward disability groups. The Journal of Special Education, 4, 295–306. doi:10.1177/002246697000400306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tropp, L. R. (2003). The psychological impact of prejudice: Implications for intergroup contact. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 131–149. doi:10.1177/1368430203006002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tropp, L. R., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2005). Differential relationships between intergroup contact and affective and cognitive dimensions of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1145–1158. doi:10.1177/0146167205274854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voci, A., & Hewstone, M. (2003). Intergroup contact and prejudice toward immigrants in Italy: The mediational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 37–54. doi:10.1177/1368430203006001011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S. L., & Mickelson, K. D. (2008). A paradox of support seeking and rejection among the stigmatized. Personal Relationships, 15, 493–509. 1350-4126/08. doi:10.1111/pere.2008.15.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. M. (2014). Hate crime victimization, 2004-2012 – Statistical tables. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/hcv0412st.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2018). Disability and health [Fact sheet]. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. B., & Giles, H. (2018). Communication accommodation theory. In Y. Y. Kim (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication (pp. 95–108). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0156
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. B., Paik, S., Xing, C., & Harwood, J. (2018). Young adults’ contact experiences and attitudes toward aging: Age salience and intergroup anxiety in South Korea. Asian Journal of Communication, 28, 468–489. doi:10.1080/01292986.2018.1453848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar