Environmental Criticism

References

• Abram, D. (1997). The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more-than-human world. New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, J. T. (2018). The ecological awareness of an anthropocene philosopher. Environmental Communication, 12, 989–993. doi:10.1080/17524032.2018.1494940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, E. (1978). Rhetorical criticism: A study in method. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bullard, R. D. (Ed.). (2005). The quest for environmental justice: Human rights and the politics of pollution. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.
   Google Scholar
• Burford, C., & Schutten, J. M. K. (2017). Internatural activists and the “Blackfish Effect”: Contemplating captive orcas’ protest rhetoric through a coherence frame. Frontiers in Communication, 1(16), 1–11. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2016.00016
   Google Scholar
• Cajete, G. (1999). “Look to the mountain”: Reflections on indigenous ecology. In G. Cajete (Ed.), A people’s ecology: Explorations in sustainable living (pp. 1–20). Santa Fe, NM: Clear Light.
   Google Scholar
• Calafell, B. M., Wanzer-Serrano, D., Maldonado, J. A., Sowards, S. K., Gonzalez, A., Watts, E., … Nakayama, T. K. (2018). #rhetoricsowhite: Addressing racial, gender, language, and nationality bias in publications, editorships, reviews, and citation patterns in rhetorical studies. Presented at the National Communication Association Convention, Salt Lake City, UT.
   Google Scholar
• Callister, D. C. (2013). Beached whales: Tracing the rhetorical force of extraordinary material articulations. In E. Plec (Ed.), Perspectives on human-animal communication: Internatural communication (pp. 35–53). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cantrill, J. G., & Oravec, C. L. (Eds.). (1996). The symbolic earth: Discourse and our creation of the environment. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
   Google Scholar
• Carbaugh, D. (1999). “Just listen”: “Listening” and landscape among the Blackfeet. Western Journal of Communication, 63, 250–270. doi:10.1080/10570319909374641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli, L. (2011). Manufactured scientific controversy: Science, rhetoric, and public debate. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 14, 195–228. doi:10.1353/rap.2010.0222
   Google Scholar
• Chakravartty, P., Kuo, R., Grubbs, V., & McIlwain, C. (2018). #CommunicationSoWhite. Journal of Communication, 68, 254–266. doi:10.1093/joc/jqy003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conquergood, D. (2002). Performance studies: Interventions and radical research. TDR, 46, 145–156. doi:10.1162/105420402320980550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett, J. (2018). Out of the woods: Seeing nature in the everyday. Reno: University of Nevada Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. (2007). Nature’s “crisis disciplines”: Does environmental communication have an ethical duty? Environmental Communication, 1, 5–20. doi:10.1080/17524030701333948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R., & Depoe, S. (2015). Emergence and growth of the “field” of environmental communication. In A. Hansen & R. Cox (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of environment and communication (pp. 13–25). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cozen, B. (2017). Facting fiction: Revolution, the United Nations, and cultural politics of electricity. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 34, 329–343. doi:10.1080/15295036.2017.1325510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Onís, K. M. (2016). “Pa’ que tú lo sepas”: Experiences with co-presence in Puerto Rico. In S. L. McKinnon, R. Asen, K. R. Chávez, & R. G. Howard (Eds.), Text + field: Innovations in rhetorical method (pp. 101–116). University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deloria, V. (2003). God is red: A native view of religion. Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, K. M., & Demo, A. T. (2000). Imaging nature: Watkins, Yosemite, and the birth of environmentalism. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 17, 241–260. doi:10.1080/15295030009388395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enck-Wanzer, D. (2011). Race, coloniality, and geo-body politics: The Garden as Latin@ vernacular discourse. Environmental Communication, 5, 363–371. doi:10.1080/17524032.2011.593535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewalt, J. P. (2018a). Points of difference in the study of more-than-human rhetorical ontologies. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 21, 523–538. doi:10.14321/rhetpublaffa.21.3.0523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewalt, J. P. (2018b). (Re)Arranging regional rhetorics. In B. McGreavy, J. Wells, G. F. McHendry Jr., & S. Senda-Cook (Eds.), Tracing rhetoric and material life: Ecological approaches (pp. 141–166). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, L. A. (2016). Between abundance and marginalization: The imperative of racial rhetorical criticism. Review of Communication, 16, 4–24. doi:10.1080/15358593.2016.1183871
   Google Scholar
• Goggin, P. N. (Ed.). (2013). Environmental rhetoric and ecologies of place. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. G., Lind, K. D., & Kutnicki, S. (2017). A rhetorical bestiary. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 47, 222–228. doi:10.1080/02773945.2017.1309904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, A., & Cox, R. (2015). Introduction: Environment and communication. In A. Hansen & R. Cox (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of environment and communication (pp. 1–10). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, G. A. (2011). Attending the vernacular: A plea for an ethnographical rhetoric. In C. Meyer & F. Girke (Eds.), The rhetorical emergence of culture (pp. 157–172). New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, A. (2011). Critical-rhetorical ethnography: Rethinking the place and process of rhetoric. Communication Studies, 62, 127–152. doi:10.1080/10510974.2011.529750
   Google Scholar
• Honor the Earth. (n.d.). Sustainable tribal economies: A guide to restoring energy and food sovereignty in Native America. Minneapolis, MN: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. N. (2018). “The most bombed nation on earth”: Western Shoshone resistance to the Nevada National Security Site. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 26, 224–239. doi:10.1080/15456870.2018.1494177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, G. A. (1992). A hoot in the dark: The evolution of general rhetoric. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 25, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGreavy, B. (2018). Intertidal poetry: Making our way through change. In B. McGreavy, J. Wells, G. F. McHendry Jr., & S. Senda-Cook (Eds.), Tracing rhetoric and material life: Ecological approaches (pp. 87–115). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• McGreavy, B., Wells, J., McHendry, G. F., Jr., & Senda-Cook, S. (2018). Tracing rhetoric and material life: Ecological approaches. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon, S. L., Asen, R., Chávez, K. R., & Howard, R. G. (2016a). Introduction: Articulating text and field in the nodes of rhetorical scholarship. In S. L. McKinnon, R. Asen, K. R. Chávez, & R. G. Howard (Eds.), Text + field: Innovations in rhetorical method (pp. 1–21). University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon, S. L., Asen, R., Chávez, K. R., & Howard, R. G. (Eds.). (2016b). Text + field: Innovations in rhetorical method. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Medin, D. L., & Bang, M. (2014). Who’s asking? Native science, western science, and science education. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, M., Hess, A., Endres, D., & Senda-Cook, S. (2015). Participatory critical rhetoric: Theoretical and methodological foundations for studying rhetoric in situ. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, M. K., Senda-Cook, S., & Endres, D. (2011). Articulating rhetorical field methods: Challenges and tensions. Western Journal of Communication, 75, 386–406. doi:10.1080/10570314.2011.586969
   Google Scholar
• Milstein, T. (2009). Environmental communication theories. In S. W. Littlejohn & K. A. Foss (Eds.), Encyclopedia of communication theory (pp. 344–349). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, S. M. (2017). Elephant tracings: A critical animal/postcolonial genealogy of the Royal Museum for Central Africa. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 14(2), 5–41.
   Google Scholar
• Na’Puti, T. R. (2016). From Guåhan and back: Navigating a “both/neither” analytic for rhetorical field methods. In S. L. McKinnon, R. Asen, K. R. Chávez, & R. G. Howard (Eds.), Text + field: Innovations in rhetorical method (pp. 56–71). University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ono, K. A., & Sloop, J. M. (1992). Commitment to telos—A sustained critical rhetoric. Communication Monographs, 59, 48–60. doi:10.1080/03637759209376248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. N., Peterson, M. J., & Rai Peterson, T. (2007). Environmental communication: Why this crisis discipline should facilitate environmental democracy. Environmental Communication, 1, 74–86. doi:10.1080/17524030701334292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezzullo, P. C. (2003). Resisting “national breast cancer awareness month”: The rhetoric of counterpublics and their cultural performances. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 89, 345–365. doi:10.1080/0033563032000160981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezzullo, P. C. (2007). Toxic tourism: Rhetorics of pollution, travel, and environmental justice. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pezzullo, P. C. (2016). Unearthing the marvelous: Environmental imprints on rhetorical criticism. Review of Communication, 16, 25–42. doi:10.1080/15358593.2016.1183874
   Google Scholar
• Pezzullo, P. C. (2017). Environment. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, 1–20. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.575
   Google Scholar
• Pezzullo, P. C., & Cox, R. (2017). Environmental communication and the public sphere. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pezzullo, P. C., & de Onís, C. M. (2018). Rethinking rhetorical field methods on a precarious planet. Communication Monographs, 85, 103–122. doi:10.1080/03637751.2017.1336780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plec, E. (2013). Perspectives on human-animal communication: An introduction. In E. Plec (Ed.), Perspectives on human-animal communication: Internatural communication (pp. 1–16). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rai, C., & Druschke, C. G. (Eds.). (2018a). Field rhetoric: Ethnography, ecology, and engagement in the places of persuasion. Tuscaloosa: University Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rai, C., & Druschke, C. G. (2018b). On being there: An introduction to studying rhetoric in the field. In C. Rai & C. G. Druschke (Eds.), Field rhetoric: Ethnography, ecology, and engagement in the places of persuasion (pp. 1–21). Tuscaloosa: University Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. A. (1998). Overcoming the objectification of nature in constitutive theories: Toward a transhuman, materialist theory of communication. Western Journal of Communication, 62, 244–272. doi:10.1080/10570319809374610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, J., Schwarze, S., Bsumek, P. K., & Peeples, J. (2016). Under pressure: Coal industry rhetoric and neoliberalism. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schutten, J. K. (2008). Chewing on the Grizzly Man: Getting to the meat of the matter. Environmental Communication, 2, 193–211. doi:10.1080/17524030802141752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutten, J. K., & Rogers, R. A. (2011). Magick as an alternative symbolic: Enacting transhuman dialogs. Environmental Communication, 5, 261–280. doi:10.1080/17524032.2011.583261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarze, S. (2007). Environmental communication as a discipline of crisis. Environmental Communication, 1, 87–98. doi:10.1080/17524030701334326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seegert, N. (2014). Play of sniffication: Coyotes sing in the margins. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 47, 158–178. doi:10.5325/philrhet.47.2.0158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seegert, N. (2016). Rewilding rhetoric with animate others. Review of Communication, 16, 77–79. doi:10.1080/15358593.2016.1183882
   Google Scholar
• Senda-Cook, S. (2012). Rugged practices: Embodying authenticity in outdoor recreation. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 98, 129–152. doi:10.1080/00335630.2012.663500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senda-Cook, S. (2013). Materializing tensions: How maps and trails mediate nature. Environmental Communication, 7, 355–371. doi:10.1080/17524032.2013.792854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senda-Cook, S. (2017). Environmental communication. In M. Allen (Ed.), The sage encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 421–425). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Smay, H. (2018). Tracing Rhetorical Tectonics in the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake (Communication 7200 Seminar Paper). Salt Lake City: University of Utah.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A. (2018). Farming, fieldwork, and sovereignty: Addressing colonialist systems with participatory critical rhetoric. In C. R. Kelly & J. E. Black (Eds.), Decolonizing Native American rhetoric: Communicating self-determination (pp. 324–342). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1, 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Wanzer-Serrano, D. (2019). Rhetoric’s Rac(e/ist)problems. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 105, 465–476. doi:10.1080/00335630.2019.1669068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, J. (1996). Introduction: Notes from a miner’s canary. In J. Weaver (Ed.), Defending mother earth: Native American perspectives on environmental justice (pp. 1–28). Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, J., McGreavy, B., Senda-Cook, S., & McHendry Jr., G. F. (2018). Introduction: Rhetoric’s ecologies. In B. McGreavy, J. Wells, G. F. McHendry Jr., & S. Senda-Cook (Eds.), Tracing rhetoric and material life: Ecological approaches (pp. 1–36). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, K. P. (2013). Justice forward: Tribes, climate adaptation and responsibility. In J. K. Maldonado, B. Colombi, & R. Pandya (Eds.), Climate change and indigenous peoples in the United States (pp. 9–22). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from http://link.springerchapter/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-05266-3_2
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, K. P. (2016). Indigenous experience, environmental justice and settler colonialism. In B. E. Bannon (Ed.), Nature and experience: Phenomenology and the environment (pp. 157–174). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Wichelns, H. A. (1925). The literary criticism of oratory. In A. M. Drummond (Ed.), Rhetoric and public speaking in honor of James A. Winans (pp. 181–216). New York, NY: Century.
   Google Scholar