What Does It Mean to Be a “Polytechnic” University? Cultural Discourse Analysis of Organizational Identity

References

• Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263–295.
   Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325–374. doi:10.1177/0149206308316059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bok, D. (2013). Higher education in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bordia, P., Restubog, S. L. D., Jimmieson, N. L., & Irmer, B. E. (2011). Haunted by the past: Effects of poor change management history on employee attitudes and turnover. Group & Organization Management, 36(2), 191–222. doi:10.1177/1059601110392990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbaugh, D. A. (1991). Communication and cultural interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 77(3), 336–342. doi:10.1080/00335639109383965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbaugh, D. A. (1996). Situating selves: The communication of social identities in American scenes. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carbaugh, D. A. (2007). Cultural discourse analysis: Communication practices and intercultural encounters. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36(3), 167–182. doi:10.1080/17475750701737090
   Google Scholar
• Carbaugh, D., & Cerulli, T. (2017). Cultural discourse analysis. In Y. Y. Kim (Gen. Ed.) & K. L. McKay-Semmler (Assoc. Ed.) (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of intercultural communication (pp. 1–9). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0117
   Google Scholar
• Cheney, G. (1983). On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification. Communication Monographs, 50(4), 342–362. doi:10.1080/03637758309390174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldner, S. B., & Fyke, J. P. (2016). Rhetorically constructing an identity at multiple levels: A case study of social entrepreneurship umbrella organizations. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 10(2), 101–114. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2016.1144188
   Google Scholar
• Fitch, K. L. (2003). Cultural persuadables. Communication Theory, 13(1), 100–123. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00284.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, M. K., & Papa, M. J. (2000). The mud, the blood, and the beer guys: Organizational osmosis in blue-collar work groups. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28(1), 68–88. doi:10.1080/00909880009365554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Schultz, M., & Corley, K. G. (2000). Organizational identity, image and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 63–81. doi:10.2307/259263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., & Thomas, J. B. (1996). Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 370–403. doi:10.2307/2393936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, T., & Milburn, T. (2019). Applying cultural discourse analysis to an online community: LinkedIn’s cultural discourse of professionalism. In M. Scollo & T. Milburn (Eds.), Engaging and transforming global communication through cultural discourse analysis (pp. 21–34). Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haseki, M., Scott, C. R., & Gailliard, B. M. (2020). Communicatively managing multiple, intersecting identities among immigrant women entrepreneurs. International Journal of Business Communication. doi:10.1177/2329488420907139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (2002). The dynamics of organizational identity. Human Relations, 55(8), 989–1018. doi:10.1177/0018726702055008181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang-Horowitz, N. C., & Evans, S. K. (2020). Communicating organizational identity as part of the legitimation process: A case study of small firms in an emerging field. International Journal of Business Communication, 57(3), 327–351. doi:10.1177/2329488417696726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35–71). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Illia, L. (2010). How business disciplines discuss multiple identities in organizations. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(4), 327–344. doi:10.1057/crr.2009.24
   Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, M. H., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2006). The impact of leadership and change management strategy on organizational culture and individual acceptance of change during a merger. British Journal of Management, 17(S1), S81–S103. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00480.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreutzer, K., & Jäger, U. (2011). Volunteering versus managerialism: Conflict over organizational identity in voluntary associations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(4), 634–661. doi:10.1177/0899764010369386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, L., & Sahay, S. (2017). Organizational change. In C. R. Scott & L. K. Lewis (Eds.), International encyclopedia of organizational communication. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lie, S. (2015). Messengers of the good news: Discourse of Chinese Indonesian Evangelical Christian (CIEC) identity. China Media Research, 11(1), 87–98.
   Google Scholar
• Lie, S. (2017). Effective evangelism: Discourses surrounding best evangelical practices in a Chinese Indonesian Evangelical Christian (CIEC) community in New England. In D. Carbaugh (Ed.), The handbook of communication in cross-cultural perspective, pp. 340-352. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lie, S. (2018). How best to evangelize to non-believers: Cultural persuasion in American and Chinese Indonesian evangelical Christian discourse on relational evangelism. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 11(1), 42–57. doi:10.1080/17513057.2017.1349920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milburn, T. (2004). Speech community: Reflections upon communication. In P. J. Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Communication Yearbook (Vol. 28, pp. 410–440).
   Google Scholar
• Myers, K. K., Davis, C. W., Schreuder, E. R., & Seibold, D. R. (2016). Organizational identification: A mixed methods study exploring students’ relationship with their university. Communication Quarterly, 64(2), 210–231. doi:10.1080/01463373.2015.1103285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philipsen, G. (1987). The prospect for cultural communication. In L. Kincaid (Ed.), Communication theory: Eastern and Western perspectives (pp. 245–254). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philipsen, G. (1997). A theory of speech codes. In G. Philipsen & T. L. Albrecht (Eds.), Developing communication theories (pp. 119–156). Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philipsen, G. (2002). Cultural communication. In W. Gudykunst & B. Mody (Eds.), Handbook of international and intercultural communication (pp. 51–67). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Philipsen, G., & Carbaugh, D. (1986). A bibliography of fieldwork in the ethnography of communication. Language in Society, 15(3), 387–397. doi:10.1017/S0047404500011829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philipsen, G. Coutu, L.M., & Covarrubias, P. (2005). Speech codes theory: Restatement, revisions, and response to criticisms. In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 55-68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Polytechnic [Def.1]. (2020). Merriam-Webster Online. Merriam-Webster. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/polytechnic
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, M. G., & Foreman, P. O. (2000). Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 18–42. doi:10.2307/259261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, C. R., Corman, S. R., & Cheney, G. (1998). Development of a structurational model of identification in the organization. Communication Theory, 8(3), 298–336. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1998.tb00223.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S. G., & Lane, V. R. (2000). A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 43–62. doi:10.5465/amr.2000.2791602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, C. R., & Stephens, K. K. (2009). It depends on who you’re talking to: Predictors and outcomes of situated measures of organizational identification. Western Journal of Communication, 73(4), 370–394. doi:10.1080/10570310903279075
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. R., & Cooren, F. (1997). What makes communication ‘organizational’? How the many voices of a collectivity become the one voice of an organization. Journal of Pragmatics, 27(4), 409–438. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00044-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. doi:10.1177/1077800410383121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whetten, D. A. (2006). Albert and Whetten revisited: Strengthening the concept of organizational identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(3), 219–234. doi:10.1177/1056492606291200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar