References
- Alexa.com. (2020). Alexa- an Amazon Company “Top Sites.” Retrieved from http://alexa.com
- Billingham, L. (2014). Improving academic library website accessibility for people with disabilities. Library Management, 35(8/9), 565–581. doi:10.1108/LM-11-2013-0107
- Brooks, M. (2018). Website accessibility: U.S. veterans affairs medical centers as a case study. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 81(4), 440–461. doi:10.1177/2329490618778329
- CDC. (2006). Center for disease control and prevention. improving the nation’s vision health: A coordinated public health approach. Internal Report, 1–58.
- CDC. (2018). CDC: 1 in 4 US adults live with a disability. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2018/p0816-disability.html
- Cox, R. (2007). Nature’s “crisis disciplines”: Does environmental communication have an ethical duty? Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 1(1), 5–20. doi:10.1080/17524030701333948
- Duplaga, M. (2017). Digital divide among people with disabilities: Analysis of data from a nationwide study for determinants of internet use and activities performed online. PLoS One, 12(6), e0179825. http://org.library.pittstate.edu/10.1371/journal.pone.0179825
- Ivory, M. Y., & Chevalier, A. (2002). A study of automated website evaluation tools.
- Ji, M. (2018). A quantitative semantic analysis of Chinese environmental media discourse. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 14(2), 387. doi:10.1515/cllt-2016-0040
- Jonsson, A. M. (2011). Framing environmental risks in the baltic sea: A news media analysis. Ambio, 40(2), 121–132. doi:10.1007/s13280-010-0124-2.
- Kaur, H., & Gupta, G. (2013). Comparative study of automated testing tools: Selenium, Quick test professional and test complete. International Journal of Computer Applications, 24(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5120/2918-3844
- Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, R. P., Rogers, R. L., & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated readability index, fog count and Flesch reading ease formula) For navy enlisted personnel. Institute for Simulation and Training, 56.
- Lee, S. M., Hong, S., An, D., & Lee, H. (2014). Disability users’ evaluation of the web accessibility of SNS. Service Business, 8(4), 517–540. http://org.library.pittstate.edu/10.1007/s11628-013-0205-y
- Mason, A., Compton, J., & Bhati, S. (2021). Disabilities and the digital divide: Assessing web accessibility, readability, and mobile accessibility of popular health websites. Journal of Health Communication, 26(10), 667–674. doi:10.1080/10810730.2021.1987591
- Mason, A., Hooey, C., Triplett, J., & Pogue, J. (2017). Deflection, disassociation, & acknowledgement: A content analysis of the 2011–2014 media framing of hydraulic fracturing and Oklahoma earthquakes. Journal of Science Communication, 16(4), A04. doi:10.22323/2.16040204
- Mason, A. M., & Wright, K. B. (2011). Framing medical tourism: An examination of appeal, risk, convalescence, accreditation, and interactivity in medical tourism websites. Journal of Health Communication, 16(2), 163–177. doi:10.1080/10810730.2010.535105
- Nichols, A., Maynard, V., Goodman, B., & Richardson, J. (2009, 3). Health, climate change and sustainability: A systematic review and thematic analysis of the literature. Environmental Health Insights, 3, 63–88. doi:10.4137/EHI.S3003
- Pezzullo, & Cox. (2017). Environmental communication and the public sphere (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
- Potter, W., & Levine-Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27(3), 258–284. doi:10.1080/00909889909365539
- Stern, P. C. (2000). Psychology and the science of human-environment interactions. American Psychologist, 55(5), 523–530. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.523
- Think with Google. (2020). Think with Google: Test my site. Retrieved from https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/feature/testmysite/
- United Nations. (2020). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) Article 24. Education. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/article-24-education.html
- U.S. General Services Administration. (2010 June). Office of government wide policy. Section 508 standards. Retrieved from http://www.section508/gov/index.cfm?fuseAction=standards.
- W3C. (2018). World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG, 2.0). Retrieved from https://www.w3g.org/TR/WCAG20/
- W3.org. (2020). Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI). Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/WAI/
- WebAIM. (2020). Web AIM: Accessibility in Mind: WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool. Retrieved from https://wave.webaim.org/
- WebFX. (2020) WebFX: Readability testing tools. Retrieved from https://www.webfx.com/tools/read-able/
- West, D. M., & Miller, E. A. (2006). The digital divide in public E-health: Barriers to accessibility and privacy in state health department websites. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 17(3), 652–667. doi:10.1353/hpu.2006.0115
- WHO. (2013). World health organization. Sixty-seventh world health assembly. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA67-REC1/A67_2014_REC1-en.pdf
- Williams, L., Macnaghten, P., Davies, R., & Curtis, S. (2017). Framing ‘fracking’: Exploring public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom. Public Understanding of Science, 26(1), 89–104. doi:10.1177/0963662515595159