Single Trait versus Multi-Trait Opinion Leadership Models

References

• Ahearn, K. K., Ferris, G. R., Hochwarter, W. A., Douglas, C., & Ammeter, A. P. (2004). Leader political skill and team performance. Journal of Management, 30(3), 309–327. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2003.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollander, W., Satornino, C. B., Hughes, D. E., & Ferris, G. R. (2015). Social networks within sales organizations: Their development and importance for salesperson performance. Journal of Marketing, 79(6), 1–16. doi:10.1509/jm.14.0444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boster, F. J., & Carpenter, C. J. (2021). Critical questions in persuasion research. San Diego, CA: Cognella.
   Google Scholar
• Boster, F. J., Carpenter, C. J., Andrews, K. R., & Mongeau, P. A. (2012). Employing interpersonal influence to promote behavioral change. Health Communication, 27(4), 399–407. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.595771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boster, F. J., Carpenter, C. J., & Kotowski, M. R. (2015). Validation studies of the maven scale. Social Influence, 10(2), 85–96. doi:10.1080/15534510.2014.939224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boster, F. J., Kotowski, M. R., Andrews, K. R., & Serota, K. (2011). Identifying influence: Development and validation of the connectivity, persuasiveness, and maven scales. Journal of Communication, 61(1), 178–197. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01531.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C. J., & Averbeck, J. M. (2017). Testing the motivations and persuasive abilities of superdiffusers in a seasonal flu vaccine word of mouth campaign. JCSTAND, 30, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C. J., Boster, F. J., Kotowski, M. R., & Day, J. (2015). Evidence for the validity of a social connectedness scale: Connectors amass bridging social capital online and offline. Communication Quarterly, 63(2), 119–134. doi:10.1080/01463373.2015.1012217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C. J., Hutabarat, D., & Kotowski, M. R. (2022). Testing the validity of the health mavenness self-report measure with self-other correlations. Communication Reports, 35(1), 53–64. doi:10.1080/08934215.2021.2021542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C. J., Kotowski, M. R., Boster, F. J., Andrews, K. R., Serota, K., & Shaw, A. S. (2009). Do superdiffusers argue differently? An analysis of argumentation style as a function of diffusion ability. Argumentation & Advocacy, 45(3), 151–170. doi:10.1080/00028533.2009.11821704
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C. J., Levine, T. R., Serota, K., & Docan-Morgan, T. (2022). Influence and personality: Relationships among superdiffuser traits and big five traits. Communication Quarterly, 70(1), 63–83. doi:10.1080/01463373.2021.2021260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C. J., Zhu, X., & Smith, R. A. (2019). Do people who identify as popular become popular in a new network? A 9-month longitudinal network analysis. Journal of Social Structure, 20(1), 1–23. doi:10.21307/joss-2019-001
   Google Scholar
• Cheek, J. M., & Buss, A. H. (1981). Shyness and sociability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(2), 330–339. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.2.330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. doi:10.1037/h0040957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, J., & Carpenter, C. J. (2016). The political superdiffuser. Illinois Political Science Review, 16, 3–28.
   Google Scholar
• de Souza, R., Dauner, K. N., Goei, R., LaCaille, L., Kotowski, M. R., & Nowak, A. L. V. (2014). An evaluation of the peer helper component of go !: A multimessage, multi-“step” obesity prevention intervention. American Journal of Health Education, 45(1), 12–19. doi:10.1080/19325037.2013.853001
   Google Scholar
• Feick, L. F., & Price, L. L. (1987). The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information. Journal of Marketing, 51(1), 83–97. doi:10.1177/002224298705100107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, G. R., Treadway, R. W., Hochwarter, W. A., Kacmar, C. J., Frink, C., Douglas, D. D., & Frink, D. D. (2005). Development and validation of the political skill inventory. Journal of Management, 31(1), 126–152. doi:10.1037/t03663-000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. (1978/1979). Centrality in networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbing, D. W. (2023). R data analysis without programming (2nd ed.). Blandings, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gnambs, T., & Batinic, B. (2011a). Convergent and discriminant validity of opinion leadership: Multitrait-multimethod analysis across measurement occasion and informant type. Journal of Individual Differences, 32(2), 94–102. doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnambs, T., & Batinic, B. (2011b). Evaluation of measurement precision with Rasch-type models: The case of the short generalized opinion leadership scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 53–58. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. doi:10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Chuffnell Regis, UK: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, E., & Berry, J. (2003). The influentials. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R. M., Draper, M., & Lee, S. (2001). Social connectedness, dysfunctional interpersonal behaviors, and psychological distress: Testing a mediator model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(3), 310–318. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.48.3.310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, R. M., & Robbins, S. B. (1995). Measuring belongingness: The social connectedness and the social assurance scales. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42(2), 232–241. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.42.2.232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (1988). Self-report as an approach to measuring communication competence. Communication Research Reports, 5(2), 108–113. doi:10.1080/08824098809359810
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. Chuffnell Regis, UK: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mullinix, K. J., Leeper, T. J., Druckman, J. N., & Freese, J. (2015). The generalizability of survey experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2), 109–138. doi:10.1017/XPS.2015.19
   Google Scholar
• Myers, J. H., & Robertson, T. S. (1972). Dimensions of opinion leadership. Journal of Marketing Research, 9(1), 41–46. doi:10.1177/002224377200900109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 100–130. 10.2189%2Fasqu.2005.50.1.100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Arroyo, D. (2010). Discovering sets of key players in social networks. In A. Abraham, A. Hassanien, & V. Snášel (Eds.), Computational social network analysis: Trends, tools, and research advances (pp. 27–48). London, UK: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E., & Cartano, D. G. (1962). Methods of measuring opinion leadership. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(3), 435–441. doi:10.1086/267118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. A., & Carpenter, C. J. (2018). Who persuades who? An analysis of persuasion choices related to antibiotic-free food. Health Communication, 33(4), 478–488. doi:10.1080/10410236.2016.1278498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. A., & Fink, E. L. (2015). Understanding the influential people and social structures shaping compliance. Journal of Social Structure, 16(1), 1–15. doi:10.21307/joss-2019-014
   Google Scholar
• Stephanone, M. A., Iacobucci, A., & Svetieva, E. (2016). Developing the network awareness construct: Evidence supporting the ability to understand novel social situations. Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (pp. 2028–2037). doi:10.1109/HICSS.2016.256
   Google Scholar
• Totterdell, P., Holman, D., & Hukin, A. (2008). Social networkers: Measuring and examining individual differences in propensity to connect with others. Social Networks, 30(4), 283–296. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trieu, P., Bayer, J. B., Ellison, N. B., Schoenebeck, S., & Falk, E. (2019). Who likes to be reachable? Availability preferences, weak ties, and bridging social capital. Information, Communication & Society, 22(8), 1096–1111. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2017.1405060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente, T. W., & Pumpuang, P. (2006). Identifying opinion leaders to promote behavior change. Health Education & Behavior, 34(6), 881–896. doi:10.1177/1090198106297855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weimann, G. (1991). The influentials: Back to the concept of opinion leaders! Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(2), 267–279. doi:10.1086/269257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weimann, G., Tustin, D. H., van Vuuren, D., & Joubert, J. P. R. (2007). Looking for opinion leaders: Traditional vs. modern measures in traditional societies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(2), 173–190. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edm005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar