1,499
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Climate Change Research Across Disciplines: The Value and Uses of Multidisciplinary Research Reviews for Technical Communication

&

REFERENCES

  • Aberra, Y. (2012). Perceptions of climate change among members of the House of Peoples’ Representatives, Ethiopia. Journal of Risk Research, 15, 771–785.
  • Anderegg, W. R. L., Prall, J. W., Harold, J. & Schneider, S. H. (2010). Expert credibility in climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 12107–12109.
  • Barton, E. & Eggly, S. (2009). Ethical or unethical persuasion? The rhetoric of offers to participate in clinical trials. Written Communication, 26, 295–319.
  • Bjorkland, R. & Pringle, C. M. (2001). Educating our communities and ourselves about conservation of aquatic resources through environmental outreach. BioScience, 51, 279–282.
  • Blythe, S., Grabill, J. T. & Riley, K. (2008). Action research and wicked environmental problems: Exploring appropriate roles for researchers in professional communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22, 272–298.
  • Bord, R. J., O'Connor, R. E. & Fisher, A. (2000). In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change? Public Understanding of Science, 9, 205–218.
  • Butler, C. (2010). Morality and climate change: Is leaving your TV on standby a risky behavior? Environmental Values, 19, 169–192.
  • Carvalho, A. & Burgess, J. (2005). Cultural circuits of climate change in U.K. broadsheet newspapers, 1985–2003. Risk Analysis, 25, 1457–1469.
  • Ceccarelli, L. (2011). Manufactured scientific controversy: Science, rhetoric, and public debate. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 14, 195–228.
  • Chowdury, P. D., Haque, C. E. & Driedger, M. (2012). Public versus expert knowledge and perception of climate change-induced heat wave risk: A modified mental method approach. Journal of Risk Research, 15, 149–168.
  • Craig, P. P. & Glasser, H. (1993). Ethics and values in environmental policy: The said and the UNCED. Environmental Values, 2, 137–157.
  • Dobrin, S. I. & Morey, S. (Eds.). (2009). Ecosee: Image, rhetoric, nature. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Engaging the public (2010, November). [Editorial]. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 17, 1287.
  • Etkin, D. & Ho, E. (2007). Climate change: Perceptions and discourses of risk. Journal of Risk Research, 10, 623–641.
  • Foust, C. R. & Murphy, W. O. (2009). Revealing and reframing apocalyptic tragedy in global warming discourse. Environmental Communication, 3, 151–167.
  • Frost, E. A. (2013). Transcultural risk communication on Dauphin Island: An analysis of ironically located responses to the Deepwater Horizon disaster. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22, 50–66.
  • Grabill, J. T. & Simmons, W. M. (1998). Toward a critical rhetoric of risk communication: Producing citizens and the role of technical communicators. Technical Communication Quarterly, 7, 415–441.
  • Hards, S. (2011). Social practice and the evolution of personal environmental values. Environmental Values, 20, 23–42.
  • Heath, Y. & Gifford, R. (2006). Free-market ideology and environmental degradation: The case of belief in global climate change. Environment & Behavior, 38, 48–71.
  • Henning, A. (2008). The illusion of economic objectivity: Linking local risks of credibility loss to global risks of climate change. Journal of Risk Research, 11, 223–235.
  • Herndl, C. G. & Brown, S. C. (Eds.). (1996). Green culture: Environmental rhetoric in contemporary America. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Herndl, C. G. & Cutlip, L. L. (2013). “How can we act?” A praxiographical program for the rhetoric of technology, science, and medicine. Poroi, 9, 1–13.
  • Homburg, A., Stolberg, A. & Wagner, U. (2007). Coping with global environmental problems development and first validation of scales. Environment & Behavior, 39, 754–778.
  • Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H. & Braman, D. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14, 147–174.
  • Kellstedt, P. M., Zahran, S. & Vedlitz, A. (2008). Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Analysis, 28, 113–126.
  • Killingsworth, M. J. & Palmer, J. S. (1992). Ecospeak: Rhetoric and environmental politics in America. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP.
  • Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L. & Visser, P. S. (2000). The impact of the fall 1997 debate about global warming on American public opinion. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 239–260.
  • Lazo, J. K., Kinnell, J. C. & Fisher, A. (2000). Expert and layperson perceptions of ecosystem risk. Risk Analysis, 20, 179–193.
  • Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous? Risk Analysis, 25, 1433–1442.
  • Lorenzoni, I., Leiserowitz, A., de Franca Doria, M., Poortinga, W. & Pidgeon, N. F. (2006). Cross-national comparisons of image associations with “global warming” and “climate change” among laypeople in the United States of America and Great Britain. Journal of Risk Research, 9, 265–281.
  • Lowe, I. (1998). Tell It Like It Is…. New Scientist, 2157, 52.
  • Masco, J. (2010). Bad weather on planetary crisis. Social Studies of Science, 40, 7–40.
  • Meijnders, A. L., Midden, C. J. H. & Wilke, H. A. M. (2001). Role of negative emotion in communication about CO2 risks. Risk Analysis, 21, 955–965.
  • Mellor, F. (2009). The politics of accuracy in judging global warming films. Environmental Communication, 3, 134–150.
  • Milfont, T. L. (2012). The interplay between knowledge, perceived efficacy, and concern about global warming and climate change: A one-year longitudinal study. Risk Analysis, 32, 1003–1020.
  • Miller, C. R. (2003). The presumption of expertise: The role of ethos in risk analysis. Configurations, 11, 163–202.
  • Moore, M. P. (2009). The Union of Concerned Scientists on the uncertainty of climate change: A study of synecdochic form. Environmental Communication, 3, 191–205.
  • Nerlich, B. (2010). “Climategate”: Paradoxical metaphors and political paralysis. Environmental Values, 19, 419–442.
  • Nolan, J. M. (2010). “An Inconvenient Truth” increases knowledge, concern, and willingness to reduce greenhouse gases. Environment & Behavior, 42, 643–658.
  • O'Connor, R. E., Bord, R. J. & Fisher, A. (1993). How information about likely accomplishments affects willingness to sacrifice to reduce global warming. Journal of Risk Research, 1, 197–207.
  • O'Connor, R. E., Bord, R. J. & Fisher, A. (1999). Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Analysis, 19, 461–471.
  • Petit, A. (2001). Domestic, virtuous women: Examining women's place in a public environmental debate along Louisiana's cancer cluster. Technical Communication Quarterly, 10, 365–386.
  • Rabinovich, A. & Morton, T. A. (2012). Unquestioned answers or unanswered questions: Beliefs about science guide responses to uncertainty in climate change risk communication. Risk Analysis, 32, 992–1002.
  • Rowland, F. S. (1993). President's lecture: The need for scientific communication with the public. Science, 260, 1571–1576.
  • Saad, L. (2012, March 30). In U.S., global warming views steady despite warm winter. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/153608/global-warming-views-steady-despite-warm-winter.aspx
  • Safi, A. S., Smith, Jr., W. J. & Liu, Z. (2012). Rural Nevada and climate change: Vulnerability, beliefs, and risk perception. Risk Analysis, 32, 1041–1059.
  • Scannell, L. & Gifford, R. (2013). Personally relevant climate change: The role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environment & Behavior, 45, 60–85.
  • Schlesinger, W. H. (2010). Translational ecology. Science, 329, 609.
  • Schneider, S. H. (2002). Keeping out of the box. American Scientist, 90, 496–498.
  • Shanahan, J. & Good, J. (2000). Heat and hot air: influence of local temperature on journalists’ coverage of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 285–295.
  • Simmons, W. M. (2007). Participation and power: A rhetoric for civic discourse in environmental policy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Simmons, W. M. & Zoetewey, M. W. (2012). Productive usability: Fostering civic engagement and creating more useful online spaces for public deliberation. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21, 251–276.
  • Smith, J. (2005). Dangerous news: Media decision making about climate change risk. Risk Analysis, 25, 1471–1482.
  • Spilka, R. (Ed.). (1993). Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Spinuzzi, C. (2003). Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Spoel, P., Goforth, D., Cheu, H. & Pearson, D. (2009). Public communication of climate change science: Engaging citizens through apocalyptic narrative explanation. Technical Communication Quarterly, 18, 49–81.
  • Stamm, K. R., Clark, F. & Eblacas, P. R. (2000). Mass communication and public understanding of environmental problems: The case of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 219–237.
  • Sundblad, E., Biel, A. & Gärling, T. (2009). Knowledge and confidence in knowledge about climate change among experts, journalists, politicians, and laypersons. Environment & Behavior, 41, 281–302.
  • Tillery, D. (2006). The problem of nuclear waste: Ethos and scientific evidence in a high-stakes public controversy. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 49, 325–334.
  • Uggla, Y. (2008). Strategies to create risk awareness and legitimacy: The Swedish climate campaign. Journal of Risk Research, 11, 719–734.
  • Ungar, S. (2000). Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture: climate change versus the ozone hole. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 297–311.
  • Waddell, C. (1996). Saving the Great Lakes: Public participation in environmental policy. In C. G. Herndl & S. C. Brown (Eds.), Green culture: Environmental rhetoric in contemporary America (pp. 141–165). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Walker, K. & Walsh, L. (2012). “No one yet knows what the ultimate consequences may be”: How Rachel Carson transformed scientific uncertainty into a site for public participation in Silent Spring. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26, 3–34.
  • Whitmarsh, L. (2008). Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. Journal of Risk Research, 11, 351–374.
  • Wickliff, G. A. (2000). Geology, photograph, and environmental rhetoric in the American West of 1860–1890. In N. Coppola & B. Karis (Eds.), Technical communication, deliberative rhetoric, and environmental discourse: Connections and directions (pp. 77–112). Stamford, CT: Ablex.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.