References
- Algarotti, F. (1739). Sir Isaac Newton’s philosophy explain’d for the use of the ladies. In Six dialogues on light and colours. From the Italian of Sig. Algarotti (Vol. 1). (E. Carter, Trans.). London, England: E. Cave. Retrieved from Eighteenth-Century Collections Online, http://find.galegroup.com.huntington.idm.oclc.org/ecco/infomark.do?&source=gale&prodId=ECCO&userGroupName=san91108&tabID=T001&docId=CW3307531840&type=multipage&contentSet=ECCOArticles&version=1.0&docLevel=FASCIMILE
- Baker, H. (1742). The microscope made easy: Or, I. The nature, uses, and magnifying powers of the best kinds of microscopes described, calculated, and explained…. London, England: R. Dodsley. Retrieved from Eighteenth-Century Collections Online, http://find.galegroup.com.huntington.idm.oclc.org/ecco/infomark.do?&source=gale&prodId=ECCO&userGroupName=san91108&tabID=T001&docId=CW3308156921&type=multipage&contentSet=ECCOArticles&version=1.0&docLevel=FASCIMILE
- Bensaude-Vincent, B., & Blondel, C. (2008). A science full of shocks, sparks and smells. In B. Bensaude-Vincent & C. Blondel (Eds.), Science and spectacle in the European Enlightenment (pp. 265–285). Hampshire, England: Ashgate.
- Biesecker, B. (1992). Michel Foucault and the question of rhetoric. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 25(4), 351–364.
- Blitefield, J. (2006). It’s showtime! Staging public demonstrations, Alinsky-style. In L. Prelli (Ed.), Rhetorics of display (pp. 255–272). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
- Borda, J. (2002). The woman suffrage parades of 1910–1913: Possibilities and limitations of an early feminist rhetorical strategy. Western Journal of Communication, 66(1), 25–52. doi:10.1080/10570310209374724
- Boston Women’s Health Collective. (1971). Our bodies, ourselves. Boston, MA: New England Free.
- Boston Women’s Health Collective. (1970). Women and their bodies: A course. Boston, MA: New England Free.
- Burke, K. (1984). Attitudes toward history. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Original work published 1937).
- Debord, G. (1994). The society of the spectacle (D. Nicholson, Trans.). New York, NY: Zone. (Original work published 1967).
- DeLuca, K. M., & Peeples, J. (2002). From public sphere to public screen: Democracy, activism, and the “violence” of Seattle. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19(2), 125–151. doi:10.1080/07393180216559
- Edgeworth, M. (1842). Harry and Lucy: With other tales (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Harper & Brothers. (Original work published 1801). Retrieved from Hathi Trust Digital Library, http://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/008589792
- Erasmus, D. (1963). On copia of words and ideas (D. B. King & H. D. Rix, Trans.). Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press. (Original work published 1536).
- Halloran, S. M. (2001). Text and experience in a historical pageant: Toward a rhetoric of spectacle. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 31(4), 5–17. doi:10.1080/02773940109391212
- Harris, J. (1719). Astronomical dialogues between a gentleman and a lady: Wherein the doctrine of the sphere, uses of the globes, and the elements of astronomy and geography are explain’d in a pleasant, easy and familiar way with a description of the famous instrument called the orrery. London, England: T. Wood. Retrieved from Eighteenth-Century Collections Online, http://find.galegroup.com.huntington.idm.oclc.org/ecco/infomark.do?&source=gale&prodId=ECCO&userGroupName=san91108&tabID=T001&docId=CW3306927856&type=multipage&contentSet=ECCOArticles&version=1.0&docLevel=FASCIMILE
- Herndl, C. (2004). The legacy of critique and the promise of practice. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 18(1), 3–8. doi:10.1177/1050651903258143
- Hesford, W. (2011). Spectacular rhetorics: Human rights visions, recognitions, feminisms. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Hill, C. A. (2004). The psychology of rhetorical images. In C. Hill & M. Helmers (Eds.), Defining visual rhetorics (pp. 25–40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Jack, J. (2009). A pedagogy of sight: Microscopic vision in Robert Hooke’s Micrographia. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 95(2), 192–209. doi:10.1080/00335630902842079
- Jarratt, S. (1991). Rereading the Sophists: Classical rhetoric refigured. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
- Keen, P. (2012). Literature, commerce, and the spectacle of modernity, 1750–1800. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Keller, D. (2003). Media spectacle. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Kennedy, V. R. (1968). Amplification: A central theme in late medieval rhetoric. Central States Speech Journal, 19(3), 214–218. doi:10.1080/10510976809362932
- Koerber, A. (2006). Rhetorical agency, resistance, and the disciplinary rhetorics of breastfeeding. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(1), 87–101. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1501_7
- Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248. doi:10.1086/421123
- Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Longinus, D. (1906). Longinus on the sublime (R. Lowth, Trans.). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press. (Original work thought to be dated around 100 CE).
- Marcet, J. (1817). Conversations on chemistry, in which the elements of that science are familiarly explained and illustrated by experiments (5th ed.). London, England: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown. (Original work published 1806).
- Martin, B. (1759–1763). The young gentleman and lady’s philosophy in a continued survey of the works of nature and art: By way of dialogue…. (Vol. 1–2). London, England: W. Owen. Retrieved from Eighteenth-Century Collections Online, http://find.galegroup.com.huntington.idm.oclc.org/ecco/infomark.do?&source=gale&prodId=ECCO&userGroupName=san91108&tabID=T001&docId=CB3332947453&type=multipage&contentSet=ECCOArticles&version=1.0&docLevel=FASCIMILE
- Newberry, J. (1761). The Newtonian system of philosophy. Adapted to the capacities of young ladies and gentlemen…. London, England: J. Newberry. Retrieved from Eighteenth-Century Collections Online, http://find.galegroup.com.huntington.idm.oclc.org/ecco/infomark.do?&source=gale&prodId=ECCO&userGroupName=san91108&tabID=T001&docId=CW3322409708&type=multipage&contentSet=ECCOArticles&version=1.0&docLevel=FASCIMILE
- Scott, J. B. (2003). Risky rhetoric: AIDS and the cultural practices of HIV testing. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
- Seigel, M. (2009). Instructions for systematic change. College Composition and Communication, 61(2), W76–W99.
- Shapin, S. (1996). The scientific revolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Stafford, B. M. (1994). Artful science: Enlightenment, entertainment, and the eclipse of visual education. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Stewart, L. (1992). The rise of public science: Rhetoric, technology, and natural philosophy in Newtonian Britain, 1660–1750. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Tonn, M. B. (2011). “From the eye to the soul”: Industrial labor’s Mary Harris “Mother” Jones and the rhetorics of display. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 41(3), 231–249. doi:10.1080/02773945.2011.575325
- Trimmer, S. (1780). An easy introduction to the knowledge of nature, and reading the Holy Scriptures. Adapted to the capacities of children. London, England: Dodsley. Retrieved from Eighteenth-Century Collections Online, http://find.galegroup.com.huntington.idm.oclc.org/ecco/infomark.do?&source=gale&prodId=ECCO&userGroupName=san91108&tabID=T001&docId=CW3322696387&type=multipage&contentSet=ECCOArticles&version=1.0&docLevel=FASCIMILE
- Wakefield, P. (1805). Domestic recreation; or dialogues illustrative of natural and scientific subjects. London, England: Darton, Harvey, and Harvey.
- Walters, A. (1997). Conversation pieces: Science and politeness in eighteenth-century England. History of Science, 35(2), 121–154. doi:10.1177/007327539703500201