The Role and Value of Technical Communicators: Technical Communicators and Subject Matter Experts Weigh In

References

• Amare, N. (2004). Act well thy part: Performing technical writer and engineer. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47(3), 211–215. doi:10.1109/TPC.2004.833693
   Google Scholar
• Anschultz, L., & Rosenberg, S. (2002). Expanding roles for technical communicators. In B. Mirel & R. Spilka (Eds.), Reshaping technical communication: New directions and challenges for the 21st century (pp. 149–163). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Boehle, S. (2007). Subject matter expert trouble? Training, 44(4), 28–30.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, M., & Schreiber, J. (2013). Static to dynamic: Professional identity as inventory, invention, and performance in classrooms and workplaces. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(4), 343–362. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.794089
   Google Scholar
• Clark, D. (2006). Rhetoric of empowerment: Genre, activity, and the distribution of capital. In C. Thralls & M. Zachry (Eds.), The cultural turn: Perspectives on communicative practices in workplaces and the professions (pp. 155–179). Amityville, NY: Baywood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dannels, D. P. (2000). Learning to be professional: Technical classroom discourse, practice, and professional identity construction. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 14(1), 5–37. doi:10.1177/105065190001400101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicks, R. S. (2010). The effects of digital literacy on the nature of technical communication work. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Digital literacy for technical communication (pp. 51–81). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eckel, N. (2010). Collaborating with subject matter experts. T & D, 64(3), 76–77.
   Google Scholar
• Faber, B., & Johnson-Eilola, J. (2003). Universities, corporate universities, and the new professionals: Professionalism and the knowledge economy. In T. Kynell-Hunt & G. J. Savage (Eds.), Power and legitimacy in technical communication series: Vol. I. The historical and contemporary struggle for professional status (pp. 209–234). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, H., & Conklin, J. (2006). Toward a meaningful model of technical communication. Technical Communication, 53(4), 395–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, J. (2006). Writing workplace cultures—Technically speaking. In J. B. Scott, B. Longo, & K. V. Wills (Eds.), Critical power tools: Technical communication and cultural studies (pp. 199–218). New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Eilola, J. (2004). Relocating the value of work: Technical communication in a post-industrial age. In J. Johnson-Eilola & S. A. Selber (Eds.), Central works in technical communication (pp. 175–192). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, L., & Tolley, C. (2004). Fitting academic programs to workplace marketability: Career paths of five technical communicators. Technical Communication, 51(3), 376–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. (2008). Leverage subject matter experts. Training, 45(3), 18–19.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. F., & Mehlenbacher, B. (2000). Technical writer/subject-matter expert interaction: The writer’s perspective, the organizational challenge. Technical Communication, 47(4), 544–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R., Fiske, M., & Kendall, P. (1990). The focused interview: A manual of problems and procedures (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Redish, J. (2003). Adding value as a professional technical communicator. Technical Communication, 50(4), 505–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, J. A. (2009). Devising collective knowledges for the technical writing classroom: A course-based approach to using web 2.0 writing technologies in collaborative work. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 52(3), 303–315. doi:10.1109/TPC.2009.2025310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, G. J. (2003). Toward professional status in technical communication. In T. Kynell-Hunt & G. J. Savage (Eds.), Power and legitimacy in technical communication series: Vol. I: The historical and contemporary struggle for professional status (pp. 1–14). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Schryer, C. F., & Spoel, P. (2005). Genre theory, health-care discourse, and professional identity formation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19(3), 249–278. doi:10.1177/1050651905275625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slack, J. D., Miller, D. J., & Doak, J. (1993). The technical communicator as author: Meaning, power, authority. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 7(1), 12–36. doi:10.1177/1050651993007001002
   Google Scholar
• Walkowski, D. (1991). Working successfully with technical experts—From their perspective. Technical Communication, 38(1), 65–67.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, R. (2013). How trust and credibility affect technology-based development projects. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 85–102. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.726484
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, G., & Ford, J. D. (2003). The big chill: Seven technical communicators talk ten years after their master’s program. Technical Communication, 50(2), 145–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar