Technical Communication Coaching: A Strategy for Instilling Reader Usability Assurance in Online Course Material Development

References

• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Wellesley, MA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., Boyles, J. L., & Rainie, L. (2012). The future of higher education. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Bartolotta, J., Bourelle, T., & Newmark, J. (2017). Revising the online classroom: Usability testing for training online technical communication instructors. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26(3).
   Google Scholar
• Bean, C. (2014a, June 8). Six tips for writing better e-learning scripts. Retrieved from https://www.td.org/Publications/Magazines/TD/TD-Archive/2014/06/6-Tips-for-Writing-Better-Elearning-Scripts
   Google Scholar
• Bean, C. (2014b). The accidental instructional designer: Learning design for the digital age. Alexandria, VA: Association for Talent Development.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, K. L. (2015). Teaching multimodal assignments in OWI contexts. In B. L. Hewett & K. E. DePew (Eds.), Foundational practices in online writing instruction (pp. 471–492). Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press. Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/owi/
   Google Scholar
• Blythe, S., Lauer, C., & Curran, P. G. (2014). Professional and technical communication in a web 2.0 world. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(4), 265–287. doi:10.1080/10572252.2014.941766
   Google Scholar
• Breuch, L. K. (2015). Faculty preparation for OWI. In B. L. Hewett & K. E. DePew (Eds.), Foundational practices in online writing instruction (pp. 349–388). Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press. Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/owi/
   Google Scholar
• Britton, B. K., & Gülgöz, S. (1991). Using Kintsch’s computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 329–345. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cason, J., & Jenkins, P. (2013). Adapting instructional documents to an online course environment. In K. C. Cook & K. Grant-Davie (Eds.), Online education 2.0: Evolving, adapting, and reinventing online technical communication (pp. 213–236). Amityville, NY: Baywood. doi:10.2190/OE2C11
   Google Scholar
• CCCC OWI Committee for Effective Practices in Online Writing Instruction. (2013). A position statement of principles and effective practices for online writing instruction (OWI). Retrieved from http://www.ncte.org/cccc/resources/positions/owiprinciples
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. Hoboken, NJ: Pfeiffer. Retrieved from http://www.nextlearning.cl/PDF/e-learning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Contact North | Contact Nord. (2013). Reducing costs through online learning: Five proven strategies from the U.S., Canada, the UK and Australia. Thunder Bay, Canada: Author. Retrieved from http://teachonline.ca/sites/default/files/tools-trends/downloads/reducing_costs_through_online_learning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cowie, P., & Nichols, M. (2010). The clash of cultures: Hybrid learning course development as management of tension. Journal of Distance Education, 24(1), 77–90.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. (2005). Applying technical communication theory to the design of online education. In K. Cargile Cook & K. Grant-Davie (Eds.), Online education: Global questions, local answers (pp. 15–99). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A., & Hasbrouck, J. (2009). A description of instructional coaching and its relationship to consultation. Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation, 19(2), 150–175. doi:10.1080/10474410802463296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePew, K. E. (2015). Preparing for the rhetoricity of OWI. In B. L. Hewett & K. E. DePew (Eds.), Foundational practices in online writing instruction (pp. 439–468). Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press. Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/owi/
   Google Scholar
• Dinishak, J. (2014). “Blind” to the obvious: Wittgenstein and Köhler on the obvious and the hidden. History of the Human Sciences, 27(4), 59–76. doi:10.1177/0952695114530393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, J., & Minter, D. (2013). The rise of the online writing classroom: Reflecting on the material conditions of college composition teaching. College Composition and Communication, 65(1), 140–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart-Davidson, W., Bernhardt, G., McLeod, M., Rife, M., & Grabill, J. T. (2007). Coming to content management: Inventing infrastructure for organizational knowledge work. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(1), 10–34. doi:10.1080/10572250701588608
   Google Scholar
• Hayhoe, G. F. (2007). The future of technical writing and editing. Technical Communication, 54(3), 281–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewett, B. L. (2015a). Grounding principles of OWI. In B. L. Hewett & K. E. DePew (Eds.), Foundational practices in online writing instruction (pp. 33–92). Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press. Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/owi/
   Google Scholar
• Hewett, B. L. (2015b). Reading to learn and writing to teach: Literacy strategies for OWI. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martins.
   Google Scholar
• Hewett, B. L., & Ehmann, C. (2004). Preparing educators for online writing instruction: Principles and processes. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Huston, T., & Weaver, C. L. (2008). Peer coaching: Professional development for experienced faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 33(1), 5–20. doi:10.1007/s10755-007-9061-9
   Google Scholar
• Isner, T., Tout, K., Zaslow, M., Soli, M., Quinn, K., Rothenberg, L., & Burkhauser, M. (2011). Coaching in early care and education programs and quality rating and improvement systems (QRIS): Identifying promising features. ashington, DC: Child Trends.
   Google Scholar
• Jaramillo-Santoy, J., & Cano-Monreal, G. (2013). Training faculty for online instruction: Applying technical communication theory to the design of a mentoring program. In K. Cargile Cook & K. Grant-Davie (Eds.), Online education 2.0: Evolving, adapting, and reinventing online technical communication (pp. 91–112). Amityville, NY: Baywood. doi:10.2190/OE2C11
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. (1984). The adult learner: A neglected species (3rd ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Koblitz, N. (1988). Problems that teach the obvious but difficult. American Mathematical Monthly, 95(3), 254–257. doi:10.2307/2323630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaRoche, C., & Traynor, B. (2013). Technical communication on life support: Content strategy and UX are the reclamation. In IEEE International Professional Communication 2013 Conference (July) (pp. 1–6). Vancouver, Canada: IEEE. doi:10.1109/IPCC.2013.6623941
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, M., Bedford, L., & Downs, L. D. (2014). Enhancing faculty performance through coaching: Targeted, individualized support. Higher Learning Research Communications, 4(4), 3–10. doi:10.18870/hlrc.v4i4.221
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, K. A. (2013a). An analysis of the cost and cost-effectiveness of faculty development for online teaching. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 18(1), 1–13. doi:10.24059/olj.v18i1.389
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, K. A. (2013b). An analysis of the research on faculty development for online teaching and identification of new directions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(4), 93–112. doi:10.24059/olj.v17i4.320
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, K. A., & Murrell, V. S. (2014). A national study of training content and activities for faculty development for online teaching. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 18(1). doi:10.24059/olj.v18i1.355
   Google Scholar
• Neufeld, B., & Roper, D. (2003). Coaching: A strategy for developing instructional capacity. Providence, RI: Annenberg Institute for School Reform. Retrieved from http://annenberginstitute.org/sites/default/files/product/268/files/Coaching.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ng, W. (2015). New digital technology in education: Conceptualizing professional learning for educators. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Orozco, M., Fowlkes, J., Jerzak, P., & Musgrove, A. (2012). Zero to sixty plus in 108 days: Launching a central elearning unit and its first faculty development program. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(2), 177–192. doi:10.24059/olj.v16i2.255
   Google Scholar
• Oswal, S. K. (2015). Physical and learning disabilities in OWI. In B. Hewett & K. DePew (Eds.), Foundational practices in online writing instruction (pp. 253–289). Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press. Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/owi/
   Google Scholar
• Oswal, S. K., & Hewett, B. L. (2013). Accessibility challenges for visually impaired students and their online writing instructors. In L. Meloncon (Ed.), Rhetorical accessability: At the intersection of technical communication and disability studies (pp. 135–156). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Poglinco, S. M., Bach, A. J., Hovde, K., Rosenblum, S., Saunders, M., & Supovitz, J. A. (2003). The heart of the matter: The coaching model in America’s choice schools. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED498335.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Redish, J. (2010). Technical communication and usability: Intertwined strands and mutual influences. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 53(3), 191–201. doi:10.1109/TPC.2010.2052861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiman, A., & Benatti, S. R. (2014, August 8). Mentoring versus coaching: What’s the difference? [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.td.org/Publications/Blogs/Human-Capital-Blog/2014/08/Mentoring-Versus-Coaching-Whats-the-Difference
   Google Scholar
• Rice, R. (2015). Faculty professionalization for OWI. In B. L. Hewett & K. E. DePew (Eds.), Foundational practices in online writing instruction (pp. 389–410). Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press. Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/owi/
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigo, R. (2015). OWI on the go. In B. L. Hewett & K. E. DePew (Eds.), Foundational practices in online writing instruction (pp. 493–516). Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press. Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/owi/
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigo, R., & Ramirez, C. (2017). Balancing institutional demands with effective practice: A lesson in curricular development. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26(3).
   Google Scholar
• Ruth, S. R. (2006, September/October). Learning: A financial and strategic perspective. Educause Quarterly, 1, 22–30. Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm0615.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scoles, J., Huxham, M., & McArthur, J. (2013). No longer exempt from good practice: Using exemplars to close the feedback gap for exams. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 631–645. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.674485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semiyu, A. A., & Folorunso, A. A. (2013). Peer coaching as an institutionalized tool for professional development. Journal of Workplace Learning, 25(2), 125–140. doi:10.1108/13665621311299807
   Google Scholar
• Spyridakis, J. H. (2015). Identifying new topics in TC curricula: Preparing students for success in a changing world. Communication Design Quarterly, 3(2), 27–37. doi:10.1145/2752853.2752857
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, A. (2015, June 18). Print all feature for entire course or modules. Retrieved from https://community.canvaslms.com/ideas/2112
   Google Scholar
• Stowers, R. H., & Barker, R. T. (2010). The coaching and mentoring process: The obvious knowledge and skill set for organizational communication professors. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 40(3), 363–371. doi:10.2190/TW.40.3.g
   Google Scholar
• Swarts, J. (2015). What user forums teach us about documentation and the value added by technical communicators. Technical Communication, 62(1), 19–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sword, H. (2012). Stylish academic writing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tauber, D. (2016). Expanding the writing franchise: Composition consulting at the graduate level. College Composition and Communication (CCC), 67(4), 634–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twigg, C. A. (2003). Improving learning and reducing costs: New models for online learning. Educause Review, 38(5), 28–38. Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0352.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Ittersum, D. (2014). Craft and narrative in DIY instructions. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(3), 227–246. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.798466
   Google Scholar
• Ventimiglia, P., & Pullman, G. (2016, March 7). From written to digital: The new literacy. Educause Review, 51(2), 36–48. Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2016/3/from-written-to-digital-the-new-literacy
   Google Scholar
• Warnock, S. (2009). Teaching writing online: How and why. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Willcox, K., Sarma, S., & Lippel, P. (2016). Online education: A catalyst for higher education reforms. Boston, MA: MIT Online Education Policy Initiative. Retrieved from https://oepi.mit.edu/files/2016/09/MIT-Online-Education-Policy-Initiative-April-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. (2007). Proust and the squid: The story and science of the reading brain. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. (2005). Workplace coaching: What’s it all about? Work, 24(3), 325–328.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zeff, R. (2007). Universal design across the curriculum. New Directions for Higher Education, 2007(137), 27–44. doi:10.1002/he.244
   Google Scholar