Revising the Online Classroom: Usability Testing for Training Online Technical Communication Instructors

References

• Barnum, C. M. (2011). Usability testing essentials: Ready, set … test! Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Bartolotta, J., Newmark, J., & Bourelle, T. (2017). Engaging with online design: Undergraduate user-testers and the practice-level struggles of usability learning. Communication Design Quarterly, 5(2).
   Google Scholar
• Blythe, S. (2001). Designing online courses: User-centered practices. Computers and Composition, 18(4), 329–346. doi:10.1016/S8755-4615(01)00066-4
   Google Scholar
• Chong, F. (2016). The pedagogy of usability: An analysis of technical communication textbooks, anthologies, and course syllabi and descriptions. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(1), 12–28. doi:10.1080/10572252.2016.1113073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, L. (2010). Assessing concurrent think-aloud protocol as a usability test method: A technical communication approach. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 53(3), 202–215. doi:10.1109/TPC.2010.2052859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePew, K. E. (2015). Preparing for the rhetoricity of OWI. In B. L. Hewett & K. E. DePew (Eds.), Foundational practices of online writing instruction (pp. 439–467). Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, L. (2003). Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(3), 379–383. doi:10.3758/BF03195514
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garrison, K. (2013). Designing and implementing a low-cost usability testing laboratory: Theoretical justifications and practical considerations. Technical Communication, 60(3), 175–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewett, B. L., & Ehmann, C. (2004). Preparing educators for online writing instruction: Principles and processes. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Hewett, B., & Ehmann Powers, C. (2007). Guest editors’ introduction. Online teaching and learning: Preparation, development, and organizational communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 1–13. doi:10.1080/10572252.2016.1113073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewett, B. L., Minter, D., Gibson, K., Meloncon, L., Oswal, S., Olsen, L., & DePew, K. E. (2011). The state of the art of OWI (Initial report of the CCCC Committee for Best Practice in Online Writing Instruction (OWI)). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Sheehan, R. (2015). Technical communication today (5th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson/Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. R. (2012). Usability testing. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (4th ed., pp. 1267–1312). New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Markel, M. (2015). Technical communication (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mirel, B., & Olsen, L. A. (1998). Social and cognitive effects of professional communication on software usability. Technical Communication Quarterly, 7(2), 197–221. doi:10.1080/10572259809364624
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., Edwards, H. M., & Zhao, T. (2012). Exploring think-alouds in usability testing: An international survey. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 55(1), 2–19. doi:10.1109/TPC.2011.2182569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller-Cochran, S. K., & Rodrigo, R. L. (2006). Determining effective distance learning designs through usability testing. Computers and Composition, 23(1), 91–107. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2005.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Boston, MA: AP Professional.
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley, C. E., Draper, S. W., & Riley, M. S. (1984). Constructive interaction: A method for studying human-computer-human interaction. In B. Shackel (Ed.), Proceedings of IFIP INTERACT’84 (pp. 269–274). London, England: Elsevier Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, E. J. (2016). Design as advocacy using a human-centered approach to investigate the needs of vulnerable populations. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(4), 427–445. doi:10.1177/0047281616653494
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, J., & Chisnell, D. (2008). Handbook of usability testing: How to plan, design, and conduct effective tests. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Salvo, M. J. (2001). Ethics of engagement: User-centered design and rhetorical methodology. Technical Communication Quarterly, 10(3), 273–290. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1003_3
   Google Scholar
• Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2012). Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research. Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. (2005). Usable pedagogies: Usability, rhetoric, and sociocultural pedagogy in the technical writing classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14(4), 447–467. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1404_4
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P. (1989). Beyond a narrow conception of usability testing. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32(4), 256–264. doi:10.1109/47.44537
   Google Scholar
• Van den Haak, M. J., De Jong, M. D., & Schellens, P. J. (2006). Constructive interaction: An analysis of verbal interaction in a usability setting. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 49(4), 311–324. doi:10.1109/TPC.2006.885865
   Google Scholar
• Warner, R., Hewett, B. (2017). Technical communication coaching: A strategy for instilling reader usability assurance in online course material development. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26(3). doi:10.1080/10572252.2017.1339493
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, T., McDonald, S., & Edwards, H. M. (2014). The impact of two different think-aloud instructions in a usability test: A case of just following orders? Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(2), 163–183. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2012.708786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar