One Word of Heart is Worth Three of Talent: Professional Communication Strategies in a Vietnamese Nonprofit Organization

References

• Agboka, G. (2012). Liberating intercultural technical communication from “large culture” ideologies: Constructing culture discursively. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 42(2), 159–181. doi:10.2190/TW.42.2.e
   Google Scholar
• Agboka, G. (2013). Participatory localization: A social justice approach to navigating unenfranchised/disenfranchised cultural sites. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 28–49. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.730966
   Google Scholar
• Agent Orange. (n.d.) Retrieved from United States Department of Veterans Affairs website. Retrieved from https://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/agentorange/index.asp
   Google Scholar
• Agent Orange. (2000). Status of the Air Force Ranch Hand Study. Hearing before the Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations of the committee on Government Reform. House of Representatives. 106th Congress, 2nd Session, No. 106-163 (2000): US Govt. Print Office.
   Google Scholar
• Alvin, A. (2018). Young Collection on Agent Orange Scope and Content. Retrieved from the United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Library, special collections website. Retrieved from https://specialcollections.nal.usda.gov/alvin-l-young-collection-agent-orange-scope-and-content-note
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bosley, D. (1993). Cross-cultural collaboration: Whose culture is it, anyway? Technical Communication Quarterly, 2(1), 51–62. doi:10.1080/10572259309364523
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, R. (2005). Technical communication (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Thomson Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Cardon, P. W. (2008). A critique of Hall’s contexting model: A meta-analysis of literature on intercultural business and technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22(4), 399–428. doi:10.1177/1050651908320361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. London, UK: Intermediate Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, M. J. (2005). Theorizing cultural identifications: Critical updates and continuing evolution. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 235–256). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 235–296. doi:10.1177/0306312702032002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Science and Astronautics: Subcommittee on Science, Research, and Development. 91st Congress, 1st Session, No. 137. (1969). US Govt. Print Office.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, H., & Savage, G. (2013). Guest editors’ introduction: New directions in intercultural professional communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 1–9. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.735634
   Google Scholar
• Do-Dihn, P. (1969). Confucius and Chinese humanism. New York, NY: Funk & Wagnalls.
   Google Scholar
• Dura, L., Singhal, A., & Elias, E. (2013). Minga Peru’s strategy for social change in the Peruvian Amazon: A rhetorical model for participatory, intercultural practice to advance human rights. Rhetoric, Professional Communication, and Globalization, 4(1), 33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, L., & Zantjer, R. (2015). Translation as a user-localization practice. Technical Communication, 62(4), 271–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, M. (2002). The political science of agent orange (SSP working paper). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Security Studies Program.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, A. M. (2012). Race, rhetoric, and technology: A case study of decolonial technical communication theory, methodology, and pedagogy. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(3), 277–310. doi:10.1177/1050651912439539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Anchor/Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1993). Cultural constraints in management theories. Academy of Management Executive, 7(1), 81–94. doi:10.5465/AME.1993.9409142061
   Google Scholar
• Hopfe, L. M., & Woodward, M. R. (2008). Religions of the world. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Humanitarian Charter. (n.d.). The sphere project. Retrieved from http://www.spherehandbook.org/en/the-humanitarian-charter/
   Google Scholar
• Hunsinger, R. P. (2006). Culture and cultural identity in intercultural technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(1), 31–48. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1501_4
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, D. A. (2007). Reconceptualizing cultural identity and its role in intercultural business communication. Journal of Business Communication, 44(3), 199–235. doi:10.1177/0021943607301346
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N., Savage, G., & Yu, H. (2014). Tracking our progress: Diversity in technical and professional communication programs. Programmatic Perspectives, 6(1), 132–152.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. N. (2014). Methods and meanings: Reflections on reflexivity and flexibility in an intercultural ethnographic study of an activist organization. Rhetoric, Professional Communication, and Globalization, 5(1), 14–43.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. N., Moore, K. R., & Walton, R. (2016). Disrupting the past to disrupt the future: An antenarrative of technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 211–229. doi:10.1080/10572252.2016.1224655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnow, S. (1997). Vietnam: A history. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Keyton, J. (2010). Communication & organizational culture: A key to understanding work experiences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Klosko, G. (Ed.). (2011). The Oxford handbook of the history of political philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lay, M. M., Wahlstrom, B. J., Rude, C. D., Selfe, C. L., & Selzer, J. (2000). Technical communication (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lewy, G. (1978). America in Vietnam (Vol. 1). London, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martini, E. (2012). Agent Orange: History, science and the politics of uncertainty (Vol. 1). Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mays, R. E., Racadio, R., & Gugerty, M. K. (2012). Competing constraints: The operational mismatch between business logistics and humanitarian effectiveness. Proceedings of the Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (pp. 132–137). Seattle, WA: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. R. (1979). A humanistic rationale for technical writing. College English, 40(6), 610–617. doi:10.2307/375964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo, A. D., Taylor, R., Roberts, C. L., & Nguyen, T. V. (2006). Association between Agent Orange and birth defects: Systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journalism of Epidemiology, 35(5), 1220–1230. doi:10.1093/ije/dyl038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ornstein, C. (2015). Are you a Vietnam veteran? Help us investigate the impact of Agent Orange. Pro Publica. Retrieved from https://www.propublica.org/getinvolved/item/vietnam-veterans-agent-orange-propublica-investigate
   Google Scholar
• Rude, C. D. (2004). Toward a definition of best practices in policy discourse. In T. Kynell-Hunt & G. J. Savage (Eds.), Power and legitimacy in technical communication, Volume II: Strategies for professional status (pp. 123–142). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. (2015). The four impulses of nonprofits and what they each create. Nonprofit Quarterly. Retrieved from https://nonprofitquarterly.org/2015/10/12/the-four-impulses-of-nonprofits-and-what-they-each-create/
   Google Scholar
• Savage, G., & Agboka, G. (2015). Guest editors’ introduction to special issue: Professional communication, social justice, and the Global South. Connexions International Professional Communication Journal, 4(1), 3–17. doi:10.21310/cnx.4.1.16savetal
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. B. (2010). Intercultural rhetoric in the technical communication curriculum: A review of the literature. Rhetoric, Professional Communication, and Globalization, 1(1), 77–90.
   Google Scholar
• Sills, P. (2014). Toxic War: The story of Agent Orange. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. (1999). A critique of postcolonial reason: Toward a history of the vanishing present. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, B. (2010). Editor introduction: Eight needed developments and eight critical contexts for global inquiry. Rhetoric, Professional Communication, and Globalization, 1(1), 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• The Agent Orange in Vietnam program. (n.d.). The Aspen Institute website. Retrieved from https://www.aspeninstitute.org/programs/agent-orange-in-vietnam-program/
   Google Scholar
• Tomasini, R. M., & Van Wassenhoven, L. N. (2009). From preparedness to partnerships: Case study research on humanitarian logistics. International Transactions in Operational Research, 16(5), 549–559. doi:10.1111/j.1475-3995.2009.00697.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. (n.d.). Veterans’ diseases associated with Agent Orange. Retrieved from https://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/agentorange/conditions/
   Google Scholar
• Use of Agent Orange in Vietnam. CED-78-158. (1978). US Govt. Print Office.
   Google Scholar
• VetsHQ. (n.d.). Agent Orange timeline. Retrieved from https://www.vetshq.com/agent-orange-timeline/
   Google Scholar
• Vietnam Association for Victims of Agent Orange. (2004). About VAVA. Retrieved from http://vava.org.vn/AboutVAVA/
   Google Scholar
• Walton, R. (2015). Making expertise visible: A disruptive workplace study with a social justice goal. Connexions International Professional Communication Journal, 4(1), 159–186. Retrieved from https://connexionsj.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/walton1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Walton, R., & Hopton, S. B. (2018). All Vietnamese men are brothers: Rhetorical strategies and community engagement practices used to support victims of Agent Orange. Technical Communication, 65(3), 309–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, R., Mays, R. E., & Haselkorn, M. (2011, May 8–11). Defining “fast”: Factors affecting perceptions of rapid response to humanitarian disasters. Proceedings of the Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management International Conference. Lisbon, Portugal: ISCRAM 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, R., Mays, R. E., & Haselkorn, M. (2016). Enacting humanitarian culture: How technical communication facilitates successful humanitarian work. Technical Communication, 63(2), 85–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• War Legacies Project. (n.d.). Agent Orange fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.agentorangerecord.com/images/uploads/modules/factsheet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, J. B (2005). Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation, Re, Vietnam Association For Victims of Agent Orange/Dioxin and ors v Dow Chemical Company and ORS, First Instance, 373 F.Supp.2d 7 (E.D.N.Y. 2005), ILDC 123 (US 2005), 10th March 2005. New York: District Court for the Eastern District of New York [EDNY].
   Google Scholar
• Yen, H. (2015). Us to pay millions for agent orange claims. The Washington Times. Retrieved from http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/18/apnewsbreak-us-to-pay-millions-for-agent-orange-cl/
   Google Scholar
• Young, A. (2009). The history, use, disposition and environmental fate of Agent Orange. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zachry, M., & Thralls, C. (Eds.). (2007). Communicative practices in workplaces and the professions: Cultural perspectives on the regulation of discourse and organizations. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar